xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>,
	Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] x86/time: correctly honor late clearing of TSC related feature flags
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 14:42:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a85173c-57d0-2dca-2dc0-34b5f22fcc73@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57A1D8E002000078001021B7@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>

On 03/08/16 10:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 02.08.16 at 21:08, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On 04/07/16 16:53, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 04.07.16 at 17:39, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>> On 20/06/16 16:20, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 20.06.16 at 16:32, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 15/06/16 11:28, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
>>>>>>> @@ -1358,6 +1358,24 @@ static void time_calibration(void *unuse
>>>>>>>                       &r, 1);
>>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> +void __init clear_tsc_cap(unsigned int feature)
>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>> +    void (*rendezvous_fn)(void *) = time_calibration_std_rendezvous;
>>>>>> This should read time_calibration_rendezvous_fn rather than assuming
>>>>>> time_calibration_std_rendezvous.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Otherwise, there is a risk that it could be reset back to
>>>>>> time_calibration_std_rendezvous.
>>>>> But that's the purpose: We may need to switch back.
>>>> Under what circumstances could we ever move from re-syncing back to not
>>>> re-syncing?
>>> verify_tsc_reliability() may result in X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE
>>> getting cleared. That's an initcall, which means it runs after
>>> init_xen_time(), and hence after the rendezvous function got
>>> established initially.
>> Right, but that isn't important.
>>
>> There will never be a case where, once TSC_RELIABLE is cleared, it is
>> safe to revert back to std_rendezvous, even if TSC_RELIABLE is
>> subsequently re-set.
> You've got this backwards: TSC_RELIABLE may get _cleared_ late.

Quite - I haven't got this backwards.

> Nothing can ever set it late, due to the use of setup_clear_cpu_cap().
> Reverting back to time_calibration_std_rendezvous() would only be
> possible if CONSTANT_TSC got cleared late, ...

time_calibration_rendezvous_fn defaults to
time_calibration_std_rendezvous(), i.e. defaults to the assumption that
the TSCs are invariant.

We then later call clear_caps(TSC_RELIABLE), and the default changes to
time_calibration_tsc_rendezvous().

We then later call clear_tsc_cap(CONSTANT_TSC), or indeed that
CONSTANT_TSC was never set in the first place, and the default switches
back to time_calibration_std_rendezvous() because of the aformentioned bug.

Once the switch to time_calibration_tsc_rendezvous() is made, it is
never safe to switch back.

Therefore, your function must read time_calibration_rendezvous_fn and
not assume time_calibration_std_rendezvous().

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-31 13:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-15  9:50 [PATCH 0/8] x86/time: improve cross-CPU clock monotonicity (and more) Jan Beulich
2016-06-15 10:26 ` [PATCH 1/8] " Jan Beulich
2016-06-15 10:32   ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-15 22:51   ` Joao Martins
2016-06-16  8:27     ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-16 20:27       ` Joao Martins
2016-06-17  7:32         ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-21 12:05           ` Joao Martins
2016-06-21 12:28             ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-21 13:57               ` Joao Martins
2016-08-02 19:30   ` Andrew Cooper
2016-06-15 10:26 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86: also generate assembler usable equates for synthesized features Jan Beulich
2016-06-20 12:50   ` Andrew Cooper
2016-06-15 10:27 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86/time: introduce and use rdtsc_ordered() Jan Beulich
2016-06-20 12:59   ` Andrew Cooper
2016-06-20 13:06     ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-20 13:07       ` Andrew Cooper
2016-07-11 11:39     ` Dario Faggioli
2016-06-15 10:28 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86/time: calibrate TSC against platform timer Jan Beulich
2016-06-20 14:20   ` Andrew Cooper
2016-06-20 15:19     ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-02 19:25       ` Andrew Cooper
2016-08-03  9:32         ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-15 10:28 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86/time: correctly honor late clearing of TSC related feature flags Jan Beulich
2016-06-20 14:32   ` Andrew Cooper
2016-06-20 15:20     ` Jan Beulich
2016-07-04 15:39       ` Andrew Cooper
2016-07-04 15:53         ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-02 19:08           ` Andrew Cooper
2016-08-03  9:43             ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-31 13:42               ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2016-08-31 14:03                 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-15 10:29 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86/time: support 32-bit wide ACPI PM timer Jan Beulich
2016-07-04 15:40   ` Andrew Cooper
2016-06-15 10:30 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86/time: fold recurring code Jan Beulich
2016-07-04 15:43   ` Andrew Cooper
2016-06-15 10:30 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86/time: group time stamps into a structure Jan Beulich
2016-07-04 15:57   ` Andrew Cooper
2016-07-01  7:44 ` Ping: [PATCH 0/8] x86/time: improve cross-CPU clock monotonicity (and more) Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9a85173c-57d0-2dca-2dc0-34b5f22fcc73@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).