From: Ben Sanda <Ben.Sanda@dornerworks.com>
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/9] xentrace/xenalyze support on ARM
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 15:50:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <A2A949C387F3A54C9B4DAC2DCD2E9A85E333C429@Quimby.dw.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <570281FC.3070203@arm.com>
Julien and Wei,
>> You patches all have the same subject line. Please make them more
>> specific. See my reply to #1 for example.
>
> +1
>
> Also, you should at least check that Xen still builds after applying
> each patch. Ideally, you also need to be careful to not break any
> feature currently supported. It's useful when someone needs to
> bisect the tree.
>
> For instance, you use the function get_pg_owner for ARM in patch #2
> but introduce the function in patch #4. This will break ARM build.
> So the patch #2 should be moved after #4.
>
> Furthermore, you remove the functions get_pg_owner and put_pg_owner
> for x86 in patch #3 and then re-introduced them in patch #4.
> Therefore, the x86 will be broken after #3. In this case, it's better
> to have a patch that move the 2 functions from x86 to common.
Thank you for the comments. I apologize for the errors in the patch
format. This is my first time submitting a patch to Xen and I was
unaware that the patch set order mattered or that I had to account for
a piecewise application of the patch set. I will attempt to resubmit
with this corrected and the patch names updated.
So then it is permissible to have multiple file changes in one
patch/commit? E.g. a patch that removes from one file and adds to
another in the same commit. I initially thought each patch/ commit was
only supposed to modify one file and that's why I did it that way
Thank you,
Ben Sanda
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-04 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-01 20:33 [PATCH V2 0/9] xentrace/xenalyze support on ARM Benjamin Sanda
2016-04-01 20:33 ` Benjamin Sanda
2016-04-01 20:33 ` [PATCH V2 1/9] xenalyze: Support for ARM platform Benjamin Sanda
2016-04-04 14:10 ` Wei Liu
2016-04-04 14:12 ` Wei Liu
2016-04-01 20:33 ` [PATCH V2 2/9] xentrace: " Benjamin Sanda
2016-04-01 20:33 ` [PATCH V2 3/9] " Benjamin Sanda
2016-04-01 20:33 ` [PATCH V2 4/9] " Benjamin Sanda
2016-04-01 20:33 ` [PATCH V2 5/9] " Benjamin Sanda
2016-04-01 20:33 ` [PATCH V2 6/9] " Benjamin Sanda
2016-04-01 20:33 ` [PATCH V2 7/9] " Benjamin Sanda
2016-04-01 20:33 ` [PATCH V2 8/9] " Benjamin Sanda
2016-04-01 20:33 ` [PATCH V2 9/9] " Benjamin Sanda
2016-04-04 14:11 ` [PATCH V2 0/9] xentrace/xenalyze support on ARM Wei Liu
2016-04-04 15:02 ` Julien Grall
2016-04-04 15:50 ` Ben Sanda [this message]
2016-04-04 15:59 ` Wei Liu
2016-04-04 16:04 ` Andrew Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=A2A949C387F3A54C9B4DAC2DCD2E9A85E333C429@Quimby.dw.local \
--to=ben.sanda@dornerworks.com \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).