From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Tian, Kevin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/HVM: honor p2m_ram_ro in hvm_map_guest_frame_rw() Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 01:41:47 +0000 Message-ID: References: <55B224660200007800095083@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKzLe-0002AL-Dd for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 01:42:58 +0000 In-Reply-To: <55B224660200007800095083@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich , xen-devel Cc: Wei Liu , "suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com" , Andrew Cooper , "Dong, Eddie" , Aravind Gopalakrishnan , "Nakajima, Jun" , Keir Fraser , Boris Ostrovsky List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@suse.com] > Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 5:41 PM > > ... and its callers. > > While all non-nested users are made fully honor the semantics of that > type, doing so in the nested case seemed insane (if doable at all, > considering VMCS shadowing), and hence there the respective operations > are simply made fail. > > One case not (yet) taken care of is that of a page getting transitioned > to this type after a mapping got established. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Acked-by: Kevin Tian