From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tamas K Lengyel Subject: Re: The Bitdefender virtual machine introspection library is now on GitHub Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 19:27:42 -0600 Message-ID: References: <55B64D6E.9030004@bitdefender.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7532313931682621124==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <55B64D6E.9030004@bitdefender.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Razvan Cojocaru Cc: mdontu , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============7532313931682621124== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114fbe3e64470e051be56031 --001a114fbe3e64470e051be56031 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Razvan, thanks for open sourcing this project! It's great to see Bitdefender moving in the OSS direction =) I've pinged the other LibVMI maintainers as well to take a look. In summary, what do you see as the benefit in libbdvmi over LibVMI? Cheers, Tamas On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm very happy to announce that the library we've created to help us > perform virtual machine introspection is now on GitHub, under the LGPLv3 > license, here: > > https://github.com/razvan-cojocaru/libbdvmi > > We hope that the community will find it useful, and welcome discussion > (the LibVMI authors in particular might find this interesting). > > The library is x86-specific, and while there's some #ifdeferry > suggesting that the earliest supported version is Xen 4.3, only Xen 4.6 > will work out-of-the-box with it. > > > Cheers, > Razvan > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel > --001a114fbe3e64470e051be56031 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Razvan,
thanks for open sourcin= g this project! It's great to see Bitdefender moving in the OSS directi= on =3D) I've pinged the other LibVMI maintainers as well to take a look= . In summary, what do you see as the benefit in libbdvmi over LibVMI?
Cheers,
Tamas

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com> wrote:
Hello all,

I'm very happy to announce that the library we've created to help u= s
perform virtual machine introspection is now on GitHub, under the LGPLv3 license, here:

https://github.com/razvan-cojocaru/libbdvmi

We hope that the community will find it useful, and welcome discussion
(the LibVMI authors in particular might find this interesting).

The library is x86-specific, and while there's some #ifdeferry
suggesting that the earliest supported version is Xen 4.3, only Xen 4.6
will work out-of-the-box with it.


Cheers,
Razvan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

--001a114fbe3e64470e051be56031-- --===============7532313931682621124== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel --===============7532313931682621124==--