From: Tamas K Lengyel <tamas@tklengyel.com>
To: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Tamas K Lengyel <tamas.lengyel@intel.com>, Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v12 2/3] x86/mem_sharing: reset a fork
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 09:54:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABfawhkxper9QAzKMVHPp-xn-upQzuwK=iMkCAnXEEgeD7aogw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200325155247.GE28601@Air-de-Roger>
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 9:52 AM Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 10:04:36AM -0700, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> > Implement hypercall that allows a fork to shed all memory that got allocated
> > for it during its execution and re-load its vCPU context from the parent VM.
> > This allows the forked VM to reset into the same state the parent VM is in a
> > faster way then creating a new fork would be. Measurements show about a 2x
> > speedup during normal fuzzing operations. Performance may vary depending how
> > much memory got allocated for the forked VM. If it has been completely
> > deduplicated from the parent VM then creating a new fork would likely be more
> > performant.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tamas K Lengyel <tamas.lengyel@intel.com>
>
> LGTM:
>
> Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
>
> One minor nit below.
>
> > ---
> > v12: remove continuation & add comment back
> > address style issues pointed out by Jan
> > ---
> > xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_sharing.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > xen/include/public/memory.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 78 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_sharing.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_sharing.c
> > index 23deeddff2..930a5f58ef 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_sharing.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_sharing.c
> > @@ -1775,6 +1775,60 @@ static int fork(struct domain *cd, struct domain *d)
> > return rc;
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * The fork reset operation is intended to be used on short-lived forks only.
> > + * There is no hypercall continuation operation implemented for this reason.
> > + * For forks that obtain a larger memory footprint it is likely going to be
> > + * more performant to create a new fork instead of resetting an existing one.
> > + *
> > + * TODO: In case this hypercall would become useful on forks with larger memory
> > + * footprints the hypercall continuation should be implemented (or if this
> > + * feature needs to be become "stable").
> > + */
> > +static int mem_sharing_fork_reset(struct domain *d, struct domain *pd)
> > +{
> > + int rc;
> > + struct p2m_domain *p2m = p2m_get_hostp2m(d);
> > + struct page_info *page, *tmp;
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&d->page_alloc_lock);
> > + domain_pause(d);
> > +
> > + page_list_for_each_safe(page, tmp, &d->page_list)
> > + {
> > + p2m_type_t p2mt;
> > + p2m_access_t p2ma;
> > + mfn_t mfn = page_to_mfn(page);
> > + gfn_t gfn = mfn_to_gfn(d, mfn);
> > +
> > + mfn = __get_gfn_type_access(p2m, gfn_x(gfn), &p2mt, &p2ma,
> > + 0, NULL, false);
> > +
> > + /* only reset pages that are sharable */
> > + if ( !p2m_is_sharable(p2mt) )
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + /* take an extra reference or just skip if can't for whatever reason */
> > + if ( !get_page(page, d) )
> > + continue;
>
> You can join both conditions above into a single one, if both just
> need to perform a continue.
We could but I think it's easier to read it this way. So I prefer to
keep it separate.
Thanks for the review!
Tamas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-25 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-23 17:04 [Xen-devel] [PATCH v12 0/3] VM forking Tamas K Lengyel
2020-03-23 17:04 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v12 1/3] xen/mem_sharing: " Tamas K Lengyel
2020-03-25 15:47 ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-03-25 16:04 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2020-03-25 16:16 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2020-03-25 16:34 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2020-03-25 16:42 ` Julien Grall
2020-03-25 16:47 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2020-03-25 16:51 ` Julien Grall
2020-03-25 17:00 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2020-03-25 17:16 ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-03-25 17:47 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2020-03-25 16:54 ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-03-26 7:02 ` Jan Beulich
2020-03-26 8:42 ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-03-26 7:07 ` Jan Beulich
2020-03-26 9:10 ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-03-26 17:01 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2020-03-26 12:33 ` Jan Beulich
2020-03-26 14:52 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2020-03-23 17:04 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v12 2/3] x86/mem_sharing: reset a fork Tamas K Lengyel
2020-03-25 15:52 ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-03-25 15:54 ` Tamas K Lengyel [this message]
2020-03-26 10:16 ` Jan Beulich
2020-03-26 14:48 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2020-03-26 14:52 ` Jan Beulich
2020-03-26 14:53 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2020-03-26 23:40 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2020-03-23 17:04 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v12 3/3] xen/tools: VM forking toolstack side Tamas K Lengyel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CABfawhkxper9QAzKMVHPp-xn-upQzuwK=iMkCAnXEEgeD7aogw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=tamas@tklengyel.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=julien@xen.org \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=tamas.lengyel@intel.com \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).