From: Tamas K Lengyel <tamas@tklengyel.com>
To: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] vm_event: Implement ARM SMC events
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:12:48 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABfawhmHmFDH5R9QZ3XV-zykrk=Z4-i_fHWgyod5swys52Oo4w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ee51bce5-e2f9-a1d6-d368-c291c1196846@bitdefender.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1701 bytes --]
> @@ -2491,6 +2492,21 @@ bad_data_abort:
> > inject_dabt_exception(regs, info.gva, hsr.len);
> > }
> >
> > +static void do_trap_smc(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, const union hsr hsr)
> > +{
> > + int rc = 0;
> > + if ( current->domain->arch.monitor.privileged_call_enabled )
> > + {
> > + rc = monitor_smc(regs);
> > + }
>
>
> If you need to increment the patch version, maybe remove the curly
> braces here?
>
Sure.
>
> > diff --git a/xen/common/vm_event.c b/xen/common/vm_event.c
> > index 2906407..a29bda8 100644
> > --- a/xen/common/vm_event.c
> > +++ b/xen/common/vm_event.c
> > @@ -818,7 +818,6 @@ int vm_event_monitor_traps(struct vcpu *v, uint8_t
> sync,
> > req->altp2m_idx = altp2m_vcpu_idx(v);
> > }
> >
> > - vm_event_fill_regs(req);
> > vm_event_put_request(d, &d->vm_event->monitor, req);
> >
> > return 1;
>
> So now for x86 we only vm_fill_regs() for CR writes and breakpoints (and
> EPT faults, but that's in p2m.c which hasn't been touched by this
> patch)? That's a pretty big change, and one that's not explained in the
> patch description (which makes no mention of any x86 changes).
>
> Having that call in vm_event_monitor_traps() made sure that all
> vm_events get a copy of the respective registers. In the x86 case, that
> includes the guest request and MSR write events, which now no longer
> seem to carry that information, unless I'm missing something.
>
> That behaviour should not change for x86 events, please.
>
Yeap, good catch. It needs to be moved from the common path because the
inputs to the function will differ on ARM and x86. I'll double-check that
the x86 paths will remain functionally the same.
Tamas
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2473 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-29 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-29 18:07 [PATCH v2 1/5] monitor: Rename vm_event_monitor_get_capabilities Tamas K Lengyel
2016-04-29 18:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] vm_event: Implement ARM SMC events Tamas K Lengyel
2016-04-29 20:07 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-29 20:12 ` Tamas K Lengyel [this message]
2016-04-29 20:27 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-04-29 20:32 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-05-02 10:35 ` Wei Liu
2016-05-03 11:31 ` Julien Grall
2016-05-03 18:48 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-05-04 10:31 ` Julien Grall
[not found] ` <CABfawhmwVQyYeGYMxKTb1zMUkyOSutMwm4bkTxoeNaFTmGuyXA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CABfawhmVUyqcuoxitKrXxcg93yLY4e8H7S1A_GEFbX3+Vb-hrA@mail.gmail.com>
2016-05-04 12:42 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-05-04 13:26 ` Julien Grall
2016-05-04 13:30 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-05-04 14:03 ` Julien Grall
2016-05-04 14:08 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-04-29 18:07 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] x86/hvm: Rename hvm/event to hvm/monitor Tamas K Lengyel
2016-05-04 1:13 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-04-29 18:07 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] x86/hvm: Add debug exception vm_events Tamas K Lengyel
2016-05-02 13:12 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-02 15:35 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-05-02 15:40 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-02 15:45 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-04-29 18:07 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] MAINTAINERS: Update monitor/vm_event covered code Tamas K Lengyel
2016-05-02 13:00 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-03 8:18 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-03 8:20 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-05-03 8:26 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-03 9:09 ` Wei Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CABfawhmHmFDH5R9QZ3XV-zykrk=Z4-i_fHWgyod5swys52Oo4w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=tamas@tklengyel.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=rcojocaru@bitdefender.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).