From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: design philosophy of blktap Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:52:47 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Xuehan Xu , Felipe Franciosi Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 6:01 AM, Xuehan Xu wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > I don't quite follow the design philosophy of blktap. Since every virtual > disk is backed by a tapdisk process, when there are hundreds of domU running > and doing I/O operation simultaneously, which means that hundreds of tapdisk > process are doing I/O read/write simulataneously in dom0, won't the I/O > performance of domU be hurt badly? I think Felipe (cc'd) might be the best person to answer this sort of question. -George