xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chong Li <lichong659@gmail.com>
To: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Cc: Chong Li <chong.li@wustl.edu>, Sisu Xi <xisisu@gmail.com>,
	George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
	Meng Xu <mengxu@cis.upenn.edu>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	Dagaen Golomb <dgolomb@seas.upenn.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 for Xen 4.7 1/4] xen: enable per-VCPU parameter settings for RTDS scheduler
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:22:43 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGHO-irJ1pM0dePVi6vry_Y5kTWPPgXT_ms144kzysTOXOc2JQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458298077.15374.96.camel@citrix.com>

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Dario Faggioli
<dario.faggioli@citrix.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-03-18 at 01:39 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >
>> > > > On 17.03.16 at 21:42, <lichong659@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:03 AM, Dario Faggioli
>> > <dario.faggioli@citrix.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > I'd say that, in this specific case, is not a big deal which one
>> > > of the
>> > > two approaches you take (mentioning or separate patch), but the
>> > > having
>> > > a separate one is indeed almost always preferable (e.g., the fix
>> > > can be
>> > > backported).
>> > If I choose mentioning, do I move the comment to the changelog? Or
>> > do I keep
>> > it here and say it again in the changelog?
>> Just consider what would happen if everyone mentioned in
>> comments the bugs they fixed. I think the answer to you question
>> is obvious then...
>>
> Exactly! :-)
>
> And, please (Chong), let me restate this: "having a separate one is
> indeed almost always preferable (e.g., the fix can be backported)"
>
Considering the complexity of making a new patch and
today's the last day for posting, I'll mention this bug fix in the changlog.

Chong



-- 
Chong Li
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Washington University in St.louis

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-18 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-16 16:47 [PATCH v7 for Xen 4.7 0/4] Enable per-VCPU parameter settings for RTDS scheduler Chong Li
2016-03-16 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 for Xen 4.7 1/4] xen: enable " Chong Li
2016-03-17 10:03   ` Dario Faggioli
2016-03-17 20:42     ` Chong Li
2016-03-18  7:39       ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-18 10:47         ` Dario Faggioli
2016-03-18 20:22           ` Chong Li [this message]
2016-03-18  7:48     ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-16 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 for Xen 4.7 2/4] libxc: " Chong Li
2016-03-16 19:24   ` Wei Liu
2016-03-17  2:28   ` Dario Faggioli
2016-03-16 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 for Xen 4.7 3/4] libxl: " Chong Li
2016-03-16 19:24   ` Wei Liu
2016-03-17  4:05   ` Dario Faggioli
2016-03-17 19:50     ` Chong Li
2016-03-18  9:17       ` Dario Faggioli
2016-03-17  4:29   ` Dario Faggioli
2016-03-16 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 for Xen 4.7 4/4] xl: " Chong Li
2016-03-16 19:24   ` Wei Liu
2016-03-16 19:29     ` Wei Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGHO-irJ1pM0dePVi6vry_Y5kTWPPgXT_ms144kzysTOXOc2JQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=lichong659@gmail.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=chong.li@wustl.edu \
    --cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=dgolomb@seas.upenn.edu \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=mengxu@cis.upenn.edu \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    --cc=xisisu@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).