From: Jason Andryuk <jandryuk@gmail.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>, "Wei Liu" <wl@xen.org>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] cpufreq: Add perf_freq to cpuinfo
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 10:19:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKf6xpsqeNPtGQ-4f7oc5idZTHurMWxen2H94LNzHdkXGmC7uw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6f3d3833-8540-ca92-8d1c-e4b7bd2217ce@suse.com>
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 9:24 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On 03.05.2021 21:27, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> > acpi-cpufreq scales the aperf/mperf measurements by max_freq, but HWP
> > needs to scale by base frequency. Settings max_freq to base_freq
> > "works" but the code is not obvious, and returning values to userspace
> > is tricky. Add an additonal perf_freq member which is used for scaling
> > aperf/mperf measurements.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Andryuk <jandryuk@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > I don't like this, but it seems the best way to re-use the common
> > aperf/mperf code. The other option would be to add wrappers that then
> > do the acpi vs. hwp scaling.
>
> Not sure I understand what you mean by "wrappers". I would assume that
> for hwp you simply install a different getavg hook? Or else I guess
> I'd need to see at least an outline of what you see as the alternative.
Something like a common get_measured_perf() returning just the
aperf/mperf ratio with cpufreq_driver specific getavg() scaling as
appropriate.
Regards,
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-26 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-03 19:27 [PATCH 00/13] Intel Hardware P-States (HWP) support Jason Andryuk
2021-05-03 19:27 ` [PATCH 01/13] cpufreq: Allow restricting to internal governors only Jason Andryuk
2021-05-26 13:18 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-26 14:12 ` Jason Andryuk
2021-05-26 15:09 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-26 16:44 ` Jason Andryuk
2021-05-03 19:27 ` [PATCH 02/13] cpufreq: Add perf_freq to cpuinfo Jason Andryuk
2021-05-26 13:24 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-26 14:19 ` Jason Andryuk [this message]
2021-05-03 19:28 ` [PATCH 03/13] cpufreq: Export intel_feature_detect Jason Andryuk
2021-05-26 13:27 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-26 14:44 ` Jason Andryuk
2021-05-26 15:11 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-03 19:28 ` [PATCH 04/13] cpufreq: Add Hardware P-State (HWP) driver Jason Andryuk
2021-05-26 14:59 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-27 7:23 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-27 18:50 ` Jason Andryuk
2021-05-28 6:35 ` Jan Beulich
2021-06-03 11:55 ` Jason Andryuk
2021-06-04 6:39 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-27 7:45 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-03 19:28 ` [PATCH 05/13] xenpm: Change get-cpufreq-para output for internal Jason Andryuk
2021-05-26 15:21 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-27 5:54 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-03 19:28 ` [PATCH 06/13] cpufreq: Export HWP parameters to userspace Jason Andryuk
2021-05-27 7:55 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-28 13:19 ` Jason Andryuk
2021-05-28 13:39 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-03 19:28 ` [PATCH 07/13] libxc: Include hwp_para in definitions Jason Andryuk
2021-05-03 19:28 ` [PATCH 08/13] xenpm: Print HWP parameters Jason Andryuk
2021-05-27 8:02 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-03 19:28 ` [PATCH 09/13] xen: Add SET_CPUFREQ_HWP xen_sysctl_pm_op Jason Andryuk
2021-05-27 8:33 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-03 19:28 ` [PATCH 10/13] libxc: Add xc_set_cpufreq_hwp Jason Andryuk
2021-05-04 8:03 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-04 11:31 ` Jason Andryuk
2021-05-27 9:45 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-03 19:28 ` [PATCH 11/13] xenpm: Factor out a non-fatal cpuid_parse variant Jason Andryuk
2021-05-27 8:41 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-03 19:28 ` [PATCH 12/13] xenpm: Add set-cpufreq-hwp subcommand Jason Andryuk
2021-05-27 9:46 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-03 19:28 ` [PATCH 13/13] CHANGELOG: Add Intel HWP entry Jason Andryuk
2021-05-27 9:48 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-20 14:57 ` [PATCH 00/13] Intel Hardware P-States (HWP) support Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKf6xpsqeNPtGQ-4f7oc5idZTHurMWxen2H94LNzHdkXGmC7uw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jandryuk@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).