From: Jason Andryuk <jandryuk@gmail.com>
To: Josef Johansson <josef@oderland.se>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI/MSI: Re-add checks for skip masking MSI-X on Xen PV
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 21:25:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKf6xpvZ8fxuBY4BZ51UZzF92zDUcvfav9_pOT7F3w-Bc8YkwA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <90277228-cf14-0cfa-c95e-d42e7d533353@oderland.se>
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 2:55 PM Josef Johansson <josef@oderland.se> wrote:
> I ended up with this patch, I also masked pci_set_mask and
> pci_set_unmask, even though patching __pci_restore_msi_state and
> __pci_restore_msi_state solved this problem, I found that it did not
> properly make the system be able to survive flip_done timeout related
> problems during suspend/resume. Would this be something you had in mind
> Marc? I will make one more try with just patching
> __pci_restore_msi_state and __pci_restore_msix_state just to make sure.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c index
> 4b4792940e86..0b2225066778 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c +++
> b/drivers/pci/msi.c @@ -420,7 +420,8 @@ static void
> __pci_restore_msi_state(struct pci_dev *dev) arch_restore_msi_irqs(dev);
> pci_read_config_word(dev, dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_FLAGS, &control); -
> pci_msi_update_mask(entry, 0, 0); + if (!(pci_msi_ignore_mask ||
> entry->msi_attrib.is_virtual)) + pci_msi_update_mask(entry, 0, 0);
> control &= ~PCI_MSI_FLAGS_QSIZE; control |= (entry->msi_attrib.multiple
This patch was mangled.
> This makes sense the patch would be like so, I'm testing this out now
> hoping it will
>
> perform as good. Now the check is performed in four places
Close. I'll reply with my compiled, but untested patch of what I was thinking.
> That leaves me with a though, will this set masked, and should be checked as well?
>
> void __pci_write_msi_msg(struct msi_desc *entry, struct msi_msg *msg)
> {
> struct pci_dev *dev = msi_desc_to_pci_dev(entry);
>
> if (dev->current_state != PCI_D0 || pci_dev_is_disconnected(dev)) {
> /* Don't touch the hardware now */
> } else if (entry->msi_attrib.is_msix) {
> void __iomem *base = pci_msix_desc_addr(entry);
> u32 ctrl = entry->msix_ctrl;
> bool unmasked = !(ctrl & PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT);
>
> if (entry->msi_attrib.is_virtual)
> goto skip;
>
> /*
> * The specification mandates that the entry is masked
> * when the message is modified:
> *
> * "If software changes the Address or Data value of an
> * entry while the entry is unmasked, the result is
> * undefined."
> */
> if (unmasked)
> >>> pci_msix_write_vector_ctrl(entry, ctrl | PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT);
My patch adds a check in pci_msix_write_vector_ctrl(), but the comment
above means PV Xen's behavior may be incorrect if Linux is calling
this function and modifying the message.
Regards,
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-25 1:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-18 6:22 [PATCH] PCI/MSI: Re-add checks for skip masking MSI-X on Xen PV Josef Johansson
2021-10-19 19:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-10-19 20:15 ` Josef Johansson
2021-10-19 20:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-10-19 21:48 ` [PATCH v2] " Josef Johansson
2021-10-20 12:51 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-20 14:03 ` Jason Andryuk
2021-10-21 8:25 ` Josef Johansson
2021-10-24 18:55 ` Josef Johansson
2021-10-25 1:25 ` [PATCH] PCI/MSI: Fix masking MSI/MSI-X " Jason Andryuk
2021-10-25 7:44 ` David Woodhouse
2021-10-25 11:43 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-25 11:53 ` David Woodhouse
2021-10-25 12:58 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-25 13:02 ` David Woodhouse
2021-10-25 14:12 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-25 12:31 ` Jason Andryuk
2021-10-25 12:27 ` Jason Andryuk
2021-10-25 16:46 ` Josef Johansson
2021-10-26 21:17 ` Josef Johansson
2021-10-27 8:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-27 9:50 ` [PATCH] PCI/MSI: Move non-mask check back into low level accessors Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-27 9:54 ` Josef Johansson
2021-10-27 12:01 ` Josef Johansson
2021-10-27 15:29 ` Josef Johansson
2021-11-03 23:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-03 23:27 ` [PATCH v2] " Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-09 14:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-10 13:31 ` Josef Johansson
2021-11-10 16:05 ` Josef Johansson
2021-11-03 23:45 ` [PATCH] " Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-04 9:00 ` Josef Johansson
2021-11-04 17:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-04 17:31 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-11-10 20:30 ` Josef Johansson
2021-11-10 23:13 ` Josef Johansson
2021-10-27 9:57 ` David Woodhouse
2021-10-25 1:25 ` Jason Andryuk [this message]
2021-10-25 19:21 ` [PATCH v2] PCI/MSI: Re-add checks for skip masking MSI-X on Xen PV Josef Johansson
2021-10-27 6:24 ` David Woodhouse
2021-10-27 8:13 ` Josef Johansson
2021-10-27 8:26 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKf6xpvZ8fxuBY4BZ51UZzF92zDUcvfav9_pOT7F3w-Bc8YkwA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jandryuk@gmail.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=josef@oderland.se \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).