From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700F4C433DF for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 19:31:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC9BC22246 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 19:31:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="rNxdRPuk" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DC9BC22246 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.6984.18277 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kSmUi-0006ly-4h; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 19:31:28 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 6984.18277; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 19:31:28 +0000 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kSmUi-0006lr-1j; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 19:31:28 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 6984; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 19:31:26 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kSmUg-0006lk-EV for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 19:31:26 +0000 Received: from mail-lj1-x243.google.com (unknown [2a00:1450:4864:20::243]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 749f7d32-3890-4b02-a482-08344a67e536; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 19:31:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-x243.google.com with SMTP id f21so643647ljh.7 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 12:31:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kSmUg-0006lk-EV for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 19:31:26 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: 749f7d32-3890-4b02-a482-08344a67e536 Received: from mail-lj1-x243.google.com (unknown [2a00:1450:4864:20::243]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 749f7d32-3890-4b02-a482-08344a67e536; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 19:31:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-x243.google.com with SMTP id f21so643647ljh.7 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 12:31:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/sQlbZjIbCkTXYZuFjyqLr22q7RrXyITM6aG6gZEwQM=; b=rNxdRPukI2aQeQhs80XN7ERXfk63ATqoDHdvm4y6fcPdYqooy40XCDG+mjGJ1quewV z7av/j5tnGBmHnG6b58/4GDRUNcAgs5ydoPZ9E65HRy+GSHu7NynekJ6n0UfxHO64cPP vpSR9bJAwVJwNKyx2CSNOfRFVfGK0NTYhHySkYSscCpeUkzlpa5aCXDOL8kPOSr3pCsv nuZdBCNCy3LfrfJsxa8DHTQOUKl5pgQL09i0xx1efDyg+ZdQ2v+CruYimYf1CV0V9A1J rCBtMBXat2nRuhcVRshcQQtmEWHiUqRPBZ4uyw/Cr/yv546I2OcqKsI36wi+SQw98Xov Y5OA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/sQlbZjIbCkTXYZuFjyqLr22q7RrXyITM6aG6gZEwQM=; b=L5++wcSnv+VYE6GtKWALA+sIkfQgbovshEeJSUMfkqYnGvlf0wPT55haOfOvYxnsdx SOO6FSiykdhrNfdELeezFxHZ2zc5KCCdsQv/XQcnFIrsheIXuaIMdN8q15u8kO57s//c nUgahJG588YcXrtcsFDeoI6ndzLUxnbUn35AkV31Dd3Ytn2lPpHyU/a6bnoQIM3dvSTo 7GO/RuBii/QUK+dJ12XJEIbzZsPHToeHk0rRflcVbJtfcbVG5a2XbNjkmX4jhPqVbT7O U5fIUEAAw/DH3MMkEmxld3T7Kq85iTe3SJ8awfW3M/bpraA9/+uIjhgmfp1BeYbQsrKB 8FmA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532wkzkwYlaEtw9Jro+FChyqP/LSOH6tq5bTCdarWffKpLEwtgr5 e0+iB6HCm3b38CFwyiVGlJaukHmzKwgCoIEh4ns= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzxtIT/fRFaxw4POtgjFD2lu3ZKUpuH6kSY1wBzaGoIgufVPV+KqKbHVmfWxJGA9ncNLpIa+gGMVDT1QoDcz2Q= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:96d2:: with SMTP id d18mr67974ljj.407.1602703884588; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 12:31:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201014175342.152712-1-jandryuk@gmail.com> <4973553f-fad2-83b9-fa19-26370ced2c2d@citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <4973553f-fad2-83b9-fa19-26370ced2c2d@citrix.com> From: Jason Andryuk Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 15:31:13 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM][PATCH 0/2] Remove Xen PVH dependency on PCI To: Andrew Cooper Cc: Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , Stefano Stabellini , xen-devel , "H. Peter Anvin" , open list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 2:04 PM Andrew Cooper wrote: > > On 14/10/2020 18:53, Jason Andryuk wrote: > > A Xen PVH domain doesn't have a PCI bus or devices, > > [*] Yet. :) > > so it doesn't need PCI support built in. > > Untangling the dependences is a good thing, but eventually we plan to > put an optional PCI bus back in, e.g. for SRIOV usecases. Yes, and to be clear this change doesn't preclude including the PCI code. I was just looking to remove code from my VMs that aren't using PCI devices. Regards, Jason