From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geoffrey Marr Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Criteria / validation proposal: drop Xen Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:36:50 -0600 Message-ID: References: <1499367541.22465.102.camel@fedoraproject.org> <20170706191317.GE21146@char.us.oracle.com> <1499370325.22465.107.camel@fedoraproject.org> <1499372357.22465.108.camel@fedoraproject.org> <60eb4374d39aa140f82d94dc4dbf40548be87be1.camel@fedoraproject.org> Reply-To: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3491000516847798279==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <60eb4374d39aa140f82d94dc4dbf40548be87be1.camel@fedoraproject.org> List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: To: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases Cc: "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============3491000516847798279== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000583a510587718bae" --000000000000583a510587718bae Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Since F24, I haven't seen or heard of anyone who uses Xen over KVM anywhere other than this thread... I'm +1 for making this test an "Optional" one. Geoff Marr IRC: coremodule On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:33 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 13:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 15:59 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > > > I would prefer for it to remain as it is. > > > > > > > > This is only practical if it's going to be tested, and tested > regularly > > > > - not *only* on the final release candidate, right before we sign off > > > > on the release. It needs to be tested regularly throughout the > release > > > > cycle, on the composes that are "nominated for testing". > > > > > > Right, which is why I am happy that you have pointed me to the right > > > place so I can be up-to-date. > > > > Great, thanks. So let's leave it as it is for now, but we'll keep an > > eye on this during F27 cycle. If we get to, say, Beta and there are no > > results for the test, that's gonna be a problem. Thanks! > > So, for Fedora 30, this was not tested throughout the whole cycle. I > think we can consider the proposal to remove the criterion active > again. > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net > http://www.happyassassin.net > _______________________________________________ > test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org > --000000000000583a510587718bae Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Since F24, I haven't seen or heard of anyone who = uses Xen over KVM anywhere other than this thread... I'm +1 for making = this test an "Optional" one.

<= div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature" data-smartmail=3D"gmail_signature= ">
Geoff Marr
IRC: coremodule


On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:33 AM Adam William= son <adamwill@fedoraprojec= t.org> wrote:
On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 13:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 15:59 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > > I would prefer for it to remain as it is.
> > >
> > > This is only practical if it's going to be tested, and t= ested regularly
> > > - not *only* on the final release candidate, right before we= sign off
> > > on the release. It needs to be tested regularly throughout t= he release
> > > cycle, on the composes that are "nominated for testing&= quot;.
> >
> > Right, which is why I am happy that you have pointed me to the ri= ght
> > place so I can be up-to-date.
>
> Great, thanks. So let's leave it as it is for now, but we'll k= eep an
> eye on this during F27 cycle. If we get to, say, Beta and there are no=
> results for the test, that's gonna be a problem. Thanks!

So, for Fedora 30, this was not tested throughout the whole cycle. I
think we can consider the proposal to remove the criterion active
again.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-cond= uct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wik= i/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lis= ts.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
--000000000000583a510587718bae-- --===============3491000516847798279== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KdGVzdCBtYWls aW5nIGxpc3QgLS0gdGVzdEBsaXN0cy5mZWRvcmFwcm9qZWN0Lm9yZwpUbyB1bnN1YnNjcmliZSBz ZW5kIGFuIGVtYWlsIHRvIHRlc3QtbGVhdmVAbGlzdHMuZmVkb3JhcHJvamVjdC5vcmcKRmVkb3Jh IENvZGUgb2YgQ29uZHVjdDogaHR0cHM6Ly9nZXRmZWRvcmEub3JnL2NvZGUtb2YtY29uZHVjdC5o dG1sCkxpc3QgR3VpZGVsaW5lczogaHR0cHM6Ly9mZWRvcmFwcm9qZWN0Lm9yZy93aWtpL01haWxp bmdfbGlzdF9ndWlkZWxpbmVzCkxpc3QgQXJjaGl2ZXM6IGh0dHBzOi8vbGlzdHMuZmVkb3JhcHJv amVjdC5vcmcvYXJjaGl2ZXMvbGlzdC90ZXN0QGxpc3RzLmZlZG9yYXByb2plY3Qub3JnCg== --===============3491000516847798279==--