From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3B8DC7EE29 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2023 15:28:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.546141.852780 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q7e1v-0008Qo-DN; Fri, 09 Jun 2023 15:27:59 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 546141.852780; Fri, 09 Jun 2023 15:27:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q7e1v-0008Qh-9z; Fri, 09 Jun 2023 15:27:59 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 546141; Fri, 09 Jun 2023 15:27:58 +0000 Received: from se1-gles-flk1-in.inumbo.com ([94.247.172.50] helo=se1-gles-flk1.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q7e1u-0008Qb-KZ for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2023 15:27:58 +0000 Received: from mail-vs1-f44.google.com (mail-vs1-f44.google.com [209.85.217.44]) by se1-gles-flk1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 351b3973-06da-11ee-8611-37d641c3527e; Fri, 09 Jun 2023 17:27:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-vs1-f44.google.com with SMTP id ada2fe7eead31-43c8e0a92f0so1310060137.0 for ; Fri, 09 Jun 2023 08:27:56 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: 351b3973-06da-11ee-8611-37d641c3527e X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686324475; x=1688916475; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=43th5QMsZDijo9cteC+0sKwCM5Cj2XjJIHl6elq6ONs=; b=inakbX6ZJ1f29JxL7/rD1frXcnJmCNYiqz5CCiBeQ+Hr3FlQdgfb45x6QevYyncU2F wxr2n6Vte4QtTmSt47C+kfqgTogt8es2JNNlg9JIiU4x011G4Zblbj8Z7yxYhHFsn9yg W+8jsL4zr7Dq5jwMPdEZCRRBLc9PqWZWoX0+TY2sjeDU5iwtLzFn8NZlQ9wax0inrO1F L+dKU2yVUVMjLUQ9FDwCdF3ykR3OFdBT+sv1FN0y3OTF1alR5nid/2jeKL8jHXeM95Wv CvcgzmaFHho3m5X1wMe0ysVJPPy3BDOBKIgdNBQQaYO95M7MqXfW02tx+xiPlJ1GXlMl RHxA== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDykX64H7rJJmY0UkXd1d996ivSeT0+MOrL8q5oSZ2TfDSVS3fya DyCrIb+feENMM3BXE2UxKgdSKjniOu6Alltq3UU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4g9D8crZxpTy/9o0HunWZ51BMvKaGJ4xdKuc4m/J0crMvKn5jdtfcjP7iClc3XLG9LiZVR16EQo25cX6tN1Pg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:330b:b0:439:6c06:606e with SMTP id v11-20020a056102330b00b004396c06606emr2407797vsc.0.1686324475347; Fri, 09 Jun 2023 08:27:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230605102840.1521549-1-ross.lagerwall@citrix.com> <2e28fcdb-f0ff-dca4-3dc4-34b11cc7e469@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <2e28fcdb-f0ff-dca4-3dc4-34b11cc7e469@intel.com> Reply-To: konrad@darnok.org From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 11:27:43 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] iscsi_ibft: Fix finding the iBFT under Xen Dom 0 To: Dave Hansen Cc: Ross Lagerwall , LKML , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Jan Beulich , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , X86 ML , Juergen Gross , Boris Ostrovsky , Peter Jones , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000544d3b05fdb40377" --000000000000544d3b05fdb40377 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Usually I put it in my tree (ibft) but since it is so simple and the user is Xen it would make more sense to do it via the Xen tree (Juergen). Thx On Fri, Jun 9, 2023, 11:16 AM Dave Hansen wrote: > On 6/5/23 03:28, Ross Lagerwall wrote: > > The result of these changes is that it is possible to boot a diskless > > Xen + Dom0 running off an iSCSI disk whereas previously it would fail to > > find the iBFT and consequently, the iSCSI root disk. > > Acked-by: Dave Hansen # for x86 > > The work in this patch seems pretty evenly split between x86 and iSCSI. > Any preferences on who picks it up? > --000000000000544d3b05fdb40377 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Usually I put it in my tree (ibft) but since it is s= o simple and the user is Xen it would make more sense to do it via the Xen = tree (Juergen).

Thx

On Fri, Jun 9, 2023, 11:16 AM D= ave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.c= om> wrote:
On 6/5/23 03:28, = Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> The result of these changes is that it is possible to boot a diskless<= br> > Xen + Dom0 running off an iSCSI disk whereas previously it would fail = to
> find the iBFT and consequently, the iSCSI root disk.

Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> # fo= r x86

The work in this patch seems pretty evenly split between x86 and iSCSI.
Any preferences on who picks it up?
--000000000000544d3b05fdb40377--