xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@arm.com>
To: Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Julien Grall <jgrall@amazon.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next] xen/arm: mm: flush_page_to_ram() only need to clean to PoC
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 11:58:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <FC521246-BD88-4D8C-82B7-6C3EFC8B00D0@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210220175413.14640-1-julien@xen.org>

Hi Julien,

> On 20 Feb 2021, at 17:54, Julien Grall <julien@xen.org> wrote:
> 
> From: Julien Grall <jgrall@amazon.com>
> 
> At the moment, flush_page_to_ram() is both cleaning and invalidate to
> PoC the page. However, the cache line can be speculated and pull in the
> cache right after as it is part of the direct map.

If we go further through this logic maybe all calls to
clean_and_invalidate_dcache_va_range could be transformed in a
clean_dcache_va_range.

> 
> So it is pointless to try to invalidate the line in the data cache.
> 

But what about processors which would not speculate ?

Do you expect any performance optimization here ?

If so it might be good to explain it as I am not quite sure I get it.

Cheers
Bertrand

> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@amazon.com>
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/mm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/mm.c b/xen/arch/arm/mm.c
> index 59f8a3f15fd1..2f11d214e184 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/mm.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/mm.c
> @@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ void flush_page_to_ram(unsigned long mfn, bool sync_icache)
> {
>     void *v = map_domain_page(_mfn(mfn));
> 
> -    clean_and_invalidate_dcache_va_range(v, PAGE_SIZE);
> +    clean_dcache_va_range(v, PAGE_SIZE);
>     unmap_domain_page(v);
> 
>     /*
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-22 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-20 17:54 [PATCH for-next] xen/arm: mm: flush_page_to_ram() only need to clean to PoC Julien Grall
2021-02-22 11:58 ` Bertrand Marquis [this message]
2021-02-22 13:37   ` Julien Grall
2021-02-22 13:48     ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-02-22 20:35     ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-02-22 20:50       ` Julien Grall
2021-02-23  1:22         ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-03-03 18:33           ` Julien Grall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=FC521246-BD88-4D8C-82B7-6C3EFC8B00D0@arm.com \
    --to=bertrand.marquis@arm.com \
    --cc=Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com \
    --cc=jgrall@amazon.com \
    --cc=julien@xen.org \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).