xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	iwj@xenproject.org, wl@xen.org, anthony.perard@citrix.com,
	jun.nakajima@intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] x86: Introduce MSR_UNHANDLED
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 11:40:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a49b03dd-19c5-5df1-81a0-0d8d9e84156b@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YDUpF8gf6fbm4ouQ@Air-de-Roger>


On 2/23/21 11:11 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:39:48AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
>> Before I do that though --- what was the conclusion on verbosity control?
> Ideally I would like to find a way to have a more generic interface to
> change verbosity level on a per-guest basis, but I haven't looked at
> all about how to do that, neither I think it would be acceptable to
> put that burden on you.
>
> Maybe we could introduce another flag to set whether ignored MSRs
> should be logged, as that would be easier to implement?


Probably.


    msr_ignore=["verbose=<bool>", "<range>", "range>", ...]


-boris


>
> I think in that case we could enforce that either all ranges have the
> flag set or not, in order to prevent ending up tracking two different
> ranges of ignored MSRs, one that triggers a message and another one
> that doesn't.
>
> Thanks, Roger.


  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-23 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-20 22:49 [PATCH v2 0/4] Permit fault-less access to non-emulated MSRs Boris Ostrovsky
2021-01-20 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] xl: Add support for ignore_msrs option Boris Ostrovsky
2021-01-21 14:56   ` Wei Liu
2021-01-21 22:43     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2021-01-22  9:52   ` Julien Grall
2021-01-22 18:28     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2021-01-22 18:33       ` Julien Grall
2021-01-22 18:39         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2021-01-22 20:42           ` Julien Grall
2021-02-18 10:42   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-02-18 11:54     ` Jan Beulich
2021-02-18 15:52       ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-02-18 15:57         ` Jan Beulich
2021-02-19 14:50           ` Boris Ostrovsky
2021-02-22 10:24             ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-02-22 10:33               ` Jan Beulich
2021-01-20 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] x86: Introduce MSR_UNHANDLED Boris Ostrovsky
2021-01-22 11:51   ` Jan Beulich
2021-01-22 18:56     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2021-02-02 17:01     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2021-02-18 10:51   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-02-19 14:56     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2021-02-22 11:08       ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-02-22 21:19         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2021-02-23  7:57           ` Jan Beulich
2021-02-23  9:34             ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-02-23 10:15               ` Jan Beulich
2021-02-23 12:17                 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-02-23 13:23                   ` Jan Beulich
2021-02-23 15:39                     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2021-02-23 16:10                       ` Jan Beulich
2021-02-23 18:00                         ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-02-23 16:11                       ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-02-23 16:40                         ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2021-02-23 18:02                           ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-02-23 18:45                             ` Boris Ostrovsky
2021-01-20 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] x86: Allow non-faulting accesses to non-emulated MSRs if policy permits this Boris Ostrovsky
2021-01-22 12:51   ` Jan Beulich
2021-01-22 19:52     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2021-01-25 10:22       ` Jan Beulich
2021-01-25 18:42         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2021-01-26  9:05           ` Jan Beulich
2021-01-26 16:02             ` Boris Ostrovsky
2021-01-26 16:35               ` Jan Beulich
2021-02-18 11:24   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-02-18 11:57     ` Jan Beulich
2021-02-18 15:53       ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-01-20 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] tools/libs: Apply MSR policy to a guest Boris Ostrovsky
2021-01-21 14:58   ` Wei Liu
2021-01-22  9:56   ` Julien Grall
2021-01-22 18:35     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2021-02-18 11:48   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-02-19 14:57     ` Boris Ostrovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a49b03dd-19c5-5df1-81a0-0d8d9e84156b@oracle.com \
    --to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
    --cc=iwj@xenproject.org \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=wl@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).