From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B9AC3A5A0 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:39:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF5C1206B9 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:39:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=citrix.com header.i=@citrix.com header.b="FZYBg2Pi" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BF5C1206B9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=citrix.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jQXZr-0007M6-JT; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:39:15 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jQXZq-0007M1-IL for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:39:14 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: b42767de-8314-11ea-b58d-bc764e2007e4 Received: from esa2.hc3370-68.iphmx.com (unknown [216.71.145.153]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id b42767de-8314-11ea-b58d-bc764e2007e4; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:39:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=citrix.com; s=securemail; t=1587393554; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=S486ude860vDA8QaHxqW7zJSFV8McnAWmJdpiHJaYTI=; b=FZYBg2PidIJdLuc/VAPDPYe+7NujJ84xeevZjw+C46DeKhVqOhwy9s6S o3Lu0dr/LzZVQVR5izdTI0AWxTiZyagvPljGbbT9c4DsAnI52j6R/dp6/ 8jCMP7wruHGn18j3zUQTJVf9GJBmLl6otmzwR+Px+/b8947dLf+5VQNtT 4=; Authentication-Results: esa2.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=None smtp.pra=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@mail.citrix.com Received-SPF: None (esa2.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of andrew.cooper3@citrix.com) identity=pra; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa2.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com"; x-sender="andrew.cooper3@citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (esa2.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: domain of Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com designates 162.221.158.21 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa2.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com"; x-sender="Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"; x-record-text="v=spf1 ip4:209.167.231.154 ip4:178.63.86.133 ip4:195.66.111.40/30 ip4:85.115.9.32/28 ip4:199.102.83.4 ip4:192.28.146.160 ip4:192.28.146.107 ip4:216.52.6.88 ip4:216.52.6.188 ip4:162.221.158.21 ip4:162.221.156.83 ip4:168.245.78.127 ~all" Received-SPF: None (esa2.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail.citrix.com) identity=helo; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa2.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail.citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible IronPort-SDR: GCvJ214p2L2UKCmiUyX3IHFMciauSDgcEU2OJooAW5i+7MFPHm1onAT9uza/eDigefxG4/kAWS VS/f7hZVysZOtLBBWFJtwiiFt6jFbbhUqs+3m7PSj1uD0vD+kstyHx/l0/KFmsrfPenYPqMnrQ Lma9TYykOgD6VBx59vi3PY3xmnqRYtd4Xdle3Qp//+gF64zoLTvh2fbGGKF/l4ptmM/qweGrnV MfSGrLNAqHePpo7z5ESUkEBlv+TsGghhvVK+QxZTWLTLg+knlGAB/aFsfvc1hjTp2jk0Qpnhwn VKA= X-SBRS: 2.7 X-MesageID: 15958555 X-Ironport-Server: esa2.hc3370-68.iphmx.com X-Remote-IP: 162.221.158.21 X-Policy: $RELAYED X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,406,1580792400"; d="scan'208";a="15958555" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/pv: Compile out compat_gdt in !CONFIG_PV builds To: Jan Beulich References: <20200417155004.16806-1-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> <20200417155004.16806-4-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> <3c8eee8d-c2ce-d262-4056-a5d2c9f843cb@suse.com> From: Andrew Cooper Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:39:09 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3c8eee8d-c2ce-d262-4056-a5d2c9f843cb@suse.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-GB X-ClientProxiedBy: AMSPEX02CAS02.citrite.net (10.69.22.113) To AMSPEX02CL02.citrite.net (10.69.22.126) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Xen-devel , Wei Liu , =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=c3=a9?= Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" On 20/04/2020 15:12, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 17.04.2020 17:50, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> There is no need for the Compat GDT if there are no 32bit PV guests. This >> saves 4k per online CPU >> >> Bloat-o-meter reports the following savings in Xen itself: >> >> add/remove: 0/3 grow/shrink: 1/4 up/down: 7/-4612 (-4605) >> Function old new delta >> cpu_smpboot_free 1249 1256 +7 >> per_cpu__compat_gdt_l1e 8 - -8 >> per_cpu__compat_gdt 8 - -8 >> init_idt_traps 442 420 -22 >> load_system_tables 414 364 -50 >> trap_init 444 280 -164 >> cpu_smpboot_callback 1255 991 -264 >> boot_compat_gdt 4096 - -4096 >> Total: Before=3062726, After=3058121, chg -0.15% >> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper >> --- >> CC: Jan Beulich >> CC: Wei Liu >> CC: Roger Pau Monné >> >> The increase in cpu_smpboot_free() appears to be a consequence of a totally >> different layout of basic blocks. >> --- >> xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c | 5 +++-- >> xen/arch/x86/desc.c | 2 ++ >> xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c | 5 ++++- >> xen/arch/x86/traps.c | 10 +++++++--- >> 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c >> index 1b33f1ed71..7b093cb421 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c >> @@ -752,8 +752,9 @@ void load_system_tables(void) >> >> _set_tssldt_desc(gdt + TSS_ENTRY, (unsigned long)tss, >> sizeof(*tss) - 1, SYS_DESC_tss_avail); >> - _set_tssldt_desc(compat_gdt + TSS_ENTRY, (unsigned long)tss, >> - sizeof(*tss) - 1, SYS_DESC_tss_busy); >> + if ( IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PV32) ) >> + _set_tssldt_desc(compat_gdt + TSS_ENTRY, (unsigned long)tss, >> + sizeof(*tss) - 1, SYS_DESC_tss_busy); > Wouldn't this better be "if ( opt_pv32 )"? Also elsewhere then. Doing it like this specifically ensures that there is never a case where things are half configured. I don't think it is wise to suggest that making opt_pv32 runtime configurable might work. ~Andrew