From: Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@citrix.com>
To: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@suse.com>,
"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, wl@xen.org, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/time: update TSC stamp on restore from deep C-state
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 12:25:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <af5e509b-e24e-2fcc-c131-bb63e9e40790@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9b7c06e-54df-bfb2-44d5-b3ef38f2a725@suse.com>
On 15/01/2020 11:40, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 15.01.2020 10:47, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 07:36:21PM +0000, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
>>> @@ -955,10 +955,16 @@ u64 stime2tsc(s_time_t stime)
>>>
>>> void cstate_restore_tsc(void)
>>> {
>>> + struct cpu_time *t = &this_cpu(cpu_time);
>>> +
>>> if ( boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC) )
>>> return;
>>>
>>> - write_tsc(stime2tsc(read_platform_stime(NULL)));
>>> + t->stamp.master_stime = read_platform_stime(NULL);
>>> + t->stamp.local_tsc = stime2tsc(t->stamp.master_stime);
>>> + t->stamp.local_stime = t->stamp.master_stime;
>>> +
>>> + write_tsc(t->stamp.local_tsc);
>>
>> In order to avoid the TSC write (and the likely associated vmexit),
>> could you instead do:
>>
>> t->stamp.local_stime = t->stamp.master_stime = read_platform_stime(NULL);
>> t->stamp.local_tsc = rdtsc_ordered();
>>
>> I think it should achieve the same as it syncs the local TSC stamp and
>> times, would avoid the TSC write and slightly simplifies the logic.
>
> Wouldn't this result in guests possibly observing the TSC moving
> backwards?
Yes, I think so. Would restoring from TSC stamp if it's higher than
platform time better you think?
Igor
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-15 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-14 19:36 [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/time: update TSC stamp on restore from deep C-state Igor Druzhinin
2020-01-15 9:47 ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-01-15 11:40 ` Jan Beulich
2020-01-15 11:53 ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-01-15 12:49 ` Jan Beulich
2020-01-15 13:44 ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-01-15 16:21 ` Jan Beulich
2020-01-16 9:33 ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-01-16 9:38 ` Jan Beulich
2020-01-16 12:09 ` Igor Druzhinin
2020-01-16 12:25 ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-01-15 12:25 ` Igor Druzhinin [this message]
2020-01-15 12:31 ` Igor Druzhinin
2020-01-15 12:41 ` Jan Beulich
2020-01-15 12:36 ` Igor Druzhinin
2020-01-15 13:23 ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-01-15 14:45 ` Igor Druzhinin
2020-01-15 11:32 ` Jan Beulich
2020-01-15 12:28 ` Igor Druzhinin
2020-01-15 12:39 ` Jan Beulich
2020-01-15 12:47 ` Igor Druzhinin
2020-01-15 12:54 ` Jan Beulich
2020-01-15 14:55 ` Andrew Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=af5e509b-e24e-2fcc-c131-bb63e9e40790@citrix.com \
--to=igor.druzhinin@citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).