From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefano Stabellini Subject: Re: efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) use Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:34:45 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <20160429142020.4499e185@canb.auug.org.au> <20160429063936.GA28320@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160429063936.GA28320@gmail.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Stephen Rothwell , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Matt Fleming , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Stefano Stabellini , Xen Devel , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shannon Zhao , Ard Biesheuvel , Borislav Petkov List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 29 Apr 2016, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Also, it would be nice to have all things EFI in a single tree, the conflicts are > going to be painful! There's very little reason not to carry this kind of commit: > > arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 6 +++++ > drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c | 17 +++++++++----- > drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > in the EFI tree. That's true. I'll drop this commit from xentip and let Matt pick it up or request changes as he sees fit.