From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
To: Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, alex.bennee@linaro.org,
masami.hiramatsu@linaro.org, ehem+xen@m5p.com,
bertrand.marquis@arm.com, andre.przywara@arm.com,
"Julien Grall" <jgrall@amazon.com>,
"Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
"Volodymyr Babchuk" <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com>,
"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"George Dunlap" <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
"Ian Jackson" <iwj@xenproject.org>,
"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@suse.com>, "Wei Liu" <wl@xen.org>,
"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] xen/acpi: Rework acpi_os_map_memory() and acpi_os_unmap_memory()
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:06:52 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2009301659350.10908@sstabellini-ThinkPad-T480s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200926205542.9261-2-julien@xen.org>
On Sat, 26 Sep 2020, Julien Grall wrote:
> From: Julien Grall <jgrall@amazon.com>
>
> The functions acpi_os_{un,}map_memory() are meant to be arch-agnostic
> while the __acpi_os_{un,}map_memory() are meant to be arch-specific.
>
> Currently, the former are still containing x86 specific code.
>
> To avoid this rather strange split, the generic helpers are reworked so
> they are arch-agnostic. This requires the introduction of a new helper
> __acpi_os_unmap_memory() that will undo any mapping done by
> __acpi_os_map_memory().
>
> Currently, the arch-helper for unmap is basically a no-op so it only
> returns whether the mapping was arch specific. But this will change
> in the future.
>
> Note that the x86 version of acpi_os_map_memory() was already able to
> able the 1MB region. Hence why there is no addition of new code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@amazon.com>
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/acpi/lib.c | 10 ++++++++++
> xen/arch/x86/acpi/lib.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
> xen/include/xen/acpi.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/acpi/lib.c b/xen/arch/arm/acpi/lib.c
> index 4fc6e17322c1..2192a5519171 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/acpi/lib.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/acpi/lib.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,10 @@ char *__acpi_map_table(paddr_t phys, unsigned long size)
> unsigned long base, offset, mapped_size;
> int idx;
>
> + /* No arch specific implementation after early boot */
> + if ( system_state >= SYS_STATE_boot )
> + return NULL;
> +
> offset = phys & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
> mapped_size = PAGE_SIZE - offset;
> set_fixmap(FIXMAP_ACPI_BEGIN, maddr_to_mfn(phys), PAGE_HYPERVISOR);
> @@ -49,6 +53,12 @@ char *__acpi_map_table(paddr_t phys, unsigned long size)
> return ((char *) base + offset);
> }
>
> +bool __acpi_unmap_table(void *ptr, unsigned long size)
> +{
> + return ( vaddr >= FIXMAP_ADDR(FIXMAP_ACPI_BEGIN) &&
> + vaddr < (FIXMAP_ADDR(FIXMAP_ACPI_END) + PAGE_SIZE) );
> +}
vaddr or ptr? :-)
lib.c: In function '__acpi_unmap_table':
lib.c:58:14: error: 'vaddr' undeclared (first use in this function)
return ( vaddr >= FIXMAP_ADDR(FIXMAP_ACPI_BEGIN) &&
^
lib.c:58:14: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
lib.c:60:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]
}
^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> /* True to indicate PSCI 0.2+ is implemented */
> bool __init acpi_psci_present(void)
> {
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/lib.c b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/lib.c
> index 265b9ad81905..77803f4d4c63 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/lib.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/lib.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,10 @@ char *__acpi_map_table(paddr_t phys, unsigned long size)
> if ((phys + size) <= (1 * 1024 * 1024))
> return __va(phys);
>
> + /* No arch specific implementation after early boot */
> + if (system_state >= SYS_STATE_boot)
> + return NULL;
> +
> offset = phys & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
> mapped_size = PAGE_SIZE - offset;
> set_fixmap(FIX_ACPI_END, phys);
> @@ -66,6 +70,20 @@ char *__acpi_map_table(paddr_t phys, unsigned long size)
> return ((char *) base + offset);
> }
>
> +bool __acpi_unmap_table(void *ptr, unsigned long size)
> +{
> + unsigned long vaddr = (unsigned long)ptr;
> +
> + if (vaddr >= DIRECTMAP_VIRT_START &&
> + vaddr < DIRECTMAP_VIRT_END) {
> + ASSERT(!((__pa(ptr) + size - 1) >> 20));
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + return (vaddr >= __fix_to_virt(FIX_ACPI_END)) &&
> + (vaddr < (__fix_to_virt(FIX_ACPI_BEGIN) + PAGE_SIZE));
> +}
> +
> unsigned int acpi_get_processor_id(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> unsigned int acpiid, apicid;
> diff --git a/xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> index 4c8bb7839eda..100eee72def2 100644
> --- a/xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> @@ -92,27 +92,29 @@ acpi_physical_address __init acpi_os_get_root_pointer(void)
> void __iomem *
> acpi_os_map_memory(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size)
> {
> - if (system_state >= SYS_STATE_boot) {
> - mfn_t mfn = _mfn(PFN_DOWN(phys));
> - unsigned int offs = phys & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
> - /* The low first Mb is always mapped on x86. */
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86) && !((phys + size - 1) >> 20))
> - return __va(phys);
> - return __vmap(&mfn, PFN_UP(offs + size), 1, 1,
> - ACPI_MAP_MEM_ATTR, VMAP_DEFAULT) + offs;
> - }
> - return __acpi_map_table(phys, size);
> + void *ptr;
> + mfn_t mfn = _mfn(PFN_DOWN(phys));
> + unsigned int offs = phys & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
> +
> + /* Try the arch specific implementation first */
> + ptr = __acpi_map_table(phys, size);
> + if (ptr)
> + return ptr;
> +
> + /* No common implementation for early boot map */
> + if (unlikely(system_state < SYS_STATE_boot))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + ptr = __vmap(&mfn, PFN_UP(offs + size), 1, 1,
> + ACPI_MAP_MEM_ATTR, VMAP_DEFAULT);
> +
> + return !ptr ? NULL : (ptr + offs);
> }
>
> void acpi_os_unmap_memory(void __iomem * virt, acpi_size size)
> {
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86) &&
> - (unsigned long)virt >= DIRECTMAP_VIRT_START &&
> - (unsigned long)virt < DIRECTMAP_VIRT_END) {
> - ASSERT(!((__pa(virt) + size - 1) >> 20));
> + if (__acpi_unmap_table(virt, size))
> return;
> - }
>
> if (system_state >= SYS_STATE_boot)
> vunmap((void *)((unsigned long)virt & PAGE_MASK));
> diff --git a/xen/include/xen/acpi.h b/xen/include/xen/acpi.h
> index c945ab05c864..5a84a4bf54e0 100644
> --- a/xen/include/xen/acpi.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/acpi.h
> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ typedef int (*acpi_table_entry_handler) (struct acpi_subtable_header *header, co
>
> unsigned int acpi_get_processor_id (unsigned int cpu);
> char * __acpi_map_table (paddr_t phys_addr, unsigned long size);
> +bool __acpi_unmap_table(void *ptr, unsigned long size);
> int acpi_boot_init (void);
> int acpi_boot_table_init (void);
> int acpi_numa_init (void);
> --
> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-01 0:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-26 20:55 [PATCH 0/4] xen/arm: Unbreak ACPI Julien Grall
2020-09-26 20:55 ` [PATCH 1/4] xen/acpi: Rework acpi_os_map_memory() and acpi_os_unmap_memory() Julien Grall
2020-09-28 8:18 ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-28 9:58 ` Julien Grall
2020-09-28 10:09 ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-28 10:39 ` Julien Grall
2020-10-10 9:49 ` Julien Grall
2020-10-10 10:04 ` Julien Grall
2020-09-29 11:10 ` Rahul Singh
2020-10-01 0:06 ` Stefano Stabellini [this message]
2020-10-01 15:09 ` Julien Grall
2020-09-26 20:55 ` [PATCH 2/4] xen/arm: acpi: The fixmap area should always be cleared during failure/unmap Julien Grall
2020-09-29 11:13 ` Rahul Singh
2020-10-01 0:30 ` Stefano Stabellini
2020-10-01 15:14 ` Julien Grall
2020-09-26 20:55 ` [PATCH 3/4] xen/arm: Check if the platform is not using ACPI before initializing Dom0less Julien Grall
2020-09-29 11:17 ` Rahul Singh
2020-09-30 23:26 ` Stefano Stabellini
2020-09-26 20:55 ` [PATCH 4/4] xen/arm: Introduce fw_unreserved_regions() and use it Julien Grall
2020-09-30 23:40 ` Stefano Stabellini
2020-10-01 15:34 ` Julien Grall
2020-09-27 1:47 ` [PATCH 0/4] xen/arm: Unbreak ACPI Elliott Mitchell
2020-09-29 15:28 ` Elliott Mitchell
2020-09-28 6:47 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-09-28 12:41 ` [PATCH] xen: acpi: Hide UART address only if SPCR exists Masami Hiramatsu
2020-09-28 12:42 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-01-19 7:25 ` Elliott Mitchell
2021-01-20 18:05 ` Julien Grall
2020-09-28 13:00 ` [PATCH 0/4] xen/arm: Unbreak ACPI Masami Hiramatsu
2020-10-16 22:33 ` Xen-ARM EFI/ACPI problems (was: Re: [PATCH 0/4] xen/arm: Unbreak ACPI) Elliott Mitchell
2020-10-17 5:12 ` Elliott Mitchell
2020-10-08 18:39 ` [PATCH 0/4] xen/arm: Unbreak ACPI Elliott Mitchell
2020-10-09 9:39 ` Julien Grall
2020-10-09 14:22 ` Elliott Mitchell
2020-10-09 18:15 ` Julien Grall
2020-10-09 22:36 ` Elliott Mitchell
2020-10-09 21:49 ` Elliott Mitchell
2020-10-10 11:02 ` Julien Grall
2020-10-12 19:02 ` Stefano Stabellini
2020-10-12 21:34 ` Elliott Mitchell
2020-10-14 1:06 ` Stefano Stabellini
2020-10-14 1:37 ` Elliott Mitchell
2020-10-14 17:47 ` Julien Grall
2020-10-15 18:00 ` Stefano Stabellini
2020-10-14 17:44 ` Julien Grall
2020-09-29 11:10 ` Rahul Singh
2020-09-29 15:29 ` Alex Bennée
2020-09-29 17:07 ` Julien Grall
2020-09-29 21:11 ` Alex Bennée
2020-09-29 23:39 ` André Przywara
2020-09-30 8:51 ` Alex Bennée
2020-09-30 10:35 ` Julien Grall
2020-09-30 9:42 ` Julien Grall
2020-09-30 10:38 ` Alex Bennée
2020-09-30 11:10 ` Julien Grall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.2009301659350.10908@sstabellini-ThinkPad-T480s \
--to=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bertrand.marquis@arm.com \
--cc=ehem+xen@m5p.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=iwj@xenproject.org \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=jgrall@amazon.com \
--cc=julien@xen.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu@linaro.org \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).