xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
To: Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, alex.bennee@linaro.org,
	masami.hiramatsu@linaro.org, ehem+xen@m5p.com,
	bertrand.marquis@arm.com, andre.przywara@arm.com,
	"Julien Grall" <jgrall@amazon.com>,
	"Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	"Volodymyr Babchuk" <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com>,
	"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"George Dunlap" <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
	"Ian Jackson" <iwj@xenproject.org>,
	"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@suse.com>, "Wei Liu" <wl@xen.org>,
	"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] xen/acpi: Rework acpi_os_map_memory() and acpi_os_unmap_memory()
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:06:52 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2009301659350.10908@sstabellini-ThinkPad-T480s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200926205542.9261-2-julien@xen.org>

On Sat, 26 Sep 2020, Julien Grall wrote:
> From: Julien Grall <jgrall@amazon.com>
> 
> The functions acpi_os_{un,}map_memory() are meant to be arch-agnostic
> while the __acpi_os_{un,}map_memory() are meant to be arch-specific.
> 
> Currently, the former are still containing x86 specific code.
> 
> To avoid this rather strange split, the generic helpers are reworked so
> they are arch-agnostic. This requires the introduction of a new helper
> __acpi_os_unmap_memory() that will undo any mapping done by
> __acpi_os_map_memory().
> 
> Currently, the arch-helper for unmap is basically a no-op so it only
> returns whether the mapping was arch specific. But this will change
> in the future.
> 
> Note that the x86 version of acpi_os_map_memory() was already able to
> able the 1MB region. Hence why there is no addition of new code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@amazon.com>
> ---
>  xen/arch/arm/acpi/lib.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  xen/arch/x86/acpi/lib.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c  | 34 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  xen/include/xen/acpi.h  |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/acpi/lib.c b/xen/arch/arm/acpi/lib.c
> index 4fc6e17322c1..2192a5519171 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/acpi/lib.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/acpi/lib.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,10 @@ char *__acpi_map_table(paddr_t phys, unsigned long size)
>      unsigned long base, offset, mapped_size;
>      int idx;
>  
> +    /* No arch specific implementation after early boot */
> +    if ( system_state >= SYS_STATE_boot )
> +        return NULL;
> +
>      offset = phys & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
>      mapped_size = PAGE_SIZE - offset;
>      set_fixmap(FIXMAP_ACPI_BEGIN, maddr_to_mfn(phys), PAGE_HYPERVISOR);
> @@ -49,6 +53,12 @@ char *__acpi_map_table(paddr_t phys, unsigned long size)
>      return ((char *) base + offset);
>  }
>  
> +bool __acpi_unmap_table(void *ptr, unsigned long size)
> +{
> +    return ( vaddr >= FIXMAP_ADDR(FIXMAP_ACPI_BEGIN) &&
> +             vaddr < (FIXMAP_ADDR(FIXMAP_ACPI_END) + PAGE_SIZE) );
> +}

vaddr or ptr?  :-)

lib.c: In function '__acpi_unmap_table':
lib.c:58:14: error: 'vaddr' undeclared (first use in this function)
     return ( vaddr >= FIXMAP_ADDR(FIXMAP_ACPI_BEGIN) &&
              ^
lib.c:58:14: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
lib.c:60:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]
 }
 ^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors



>  /* True to indicate PSCI 0.2+ is implemented */
>  bool __init acpi_psci_present(void)
>  {
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/lib.c b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/lib.c
> index 265b9ad81905..77803f4d4c63 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/lib.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/lib.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,10 @@ char *__acpi_map_table(paddr_t phys, unsigned long size)
>  	if ((phys + size) <= (1 * 1024 * 1024))
>  		return __va(phys);
>  
> +	/* No arch specific implementation after early boot */
> +	if (system_state >= SYS_STATE_boot)
> +		return NULL;
> +
>  	offset = phys & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
>  	mapped_size = PAGE_SIZE - offset;
>  	set_fixmap(FIX_ACPI_END, phys);
> @@ -66,6 +70,20 @@ char *__acpi_map_table(paddr_t phys, unsigned long size)
>  	return ((char *) base + offset);
>  }
>  
> +bool __acpi_unmap_table(void *ptr, unsigned long size)
> +{
> +	unsigned long vaddr = (unsigned long)ptr;
> +
> +	if (vaddr >= DIRECTMAP_VIRT_START &&
> +	    vaddr < DIRECTMAP_VIRT_END) {
> +		ASSERT(!((__pa(ptr) + size - 1) >> 20));
> +		return true;
> +	}
> +
> +	return (vaddr >= __fix_to_virt(FIX_ACPI_END)) &&
> +		(vaddr < (__fix_to_virt(FIX_ACPI_BEGIN) + PAGE_SIZE));
> +}
> +
>  unsigned int acpi_get_processor_id(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
>  	unsigned int acpiid, apicid;
> diff --git a/xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> index 4c8bb7839eda..100eee72def2 100644
> --- a/xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> @@ -92,27 +92,29 @@ acpi_physical_address __init acpi_os_get_root_pointer(void)
>  void __iomem *
>  acpi_os_map_memory(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size)
>  {
> -	if (system_state >= SYS_STATE_boot) {
> -		mfn_t mfn = _mfn(PFN_DOWN(phys));
> -		unsigned int offs = phys & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
> -		/* The low first Mb is always mapped on x86. */
> -		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86) && !((phys + size - 1) >> 20))
> -			return __va(phys);
> -		return __vmap(&mfn, PFN_UP(offs + size), 1, 1,
> -			      ACPI_MAP_MEM_ATTR, VMAP_DEFAULT) + offs;
> -	}
> -	return __acpi_map_table(phys, size);
> +	void *ptr;
> +	mfn_t mfn = _mfn(PFN_DOWN(phys));
> +	unsigned int offs = phys & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
> +
> +	/* Try the arch specific implementation first */
> +	ptr = __acpi_map_table(phys, size);
> +	if (ptr)
> +		return ptr;
> +
> +	/* No common implementation for early boot map */
> +	if (unlikely(system_state < SYS_STATE_boot))
> +	     return NULL;
> +
> +	ptr = __vmap(&mfn, PFN_UP(offs + size), 1, 1,
> +		     ACPI_MAP_MEM_ATTR, VMAP_DEFAULT);
> +
> +	return !ptr ? NULL : (ptr + offs);
>  }
>  
>  void acpi_os_unmap_memory(void __iomem * virt, acpi_size size)
>  {
> -	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86) &&
> -	    (unsigned long)virt >= DIRECTMAP_VIRT_START &&
> -	    (unsigned long)virt < DIRECTMAP_VIRT_END) {
> -		ASSERT(!((__pa(virt) + size - 1) >> 20));
> +	if (__acpi_unmap_table(virt, size))
>  		return;
> -	}
>  
>  	if (system_state >= SYS_STATE_boot)
>  		vunmap((void *)((unsigned long)virt & PAGE_MASK));
> diff --git a/xen/include/xen/acpi.h b/xen/include/xen/acpi.h
> index c945ab05c864..5a84a4bf54e0 100644
> --- a/xen/include/xen/acpi.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/acpi.h
> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ typedef int (*acpi_table_entry_handler) (struct acpi_subtable_header *header, co
>  
>  unsigned int acpi_get_processor_id (unsigned int cpu);
>  char * __acpi_map_table (paddr_t phys_addr, unsigned long size);
> +bool __acpi_unmap_table(void *ptr, unsigned long size);
>  int acpi_boot_init (void);
>  int acpi_boot_table_init (void);
>  int acpi_numa_init (void);
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-01  0:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-26 20:55 [PATCH 0/4] xen/arm: Unbreak ACPI Julien Grall
2020-09-26 20:55 ` [PATCH 1/4] xen/acpi: Rework acpi_os_map_memory() and acpi_os_unmap_memory() Julien Grall
2020-09-28  8:18   ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-28  9:58     ` Julien Grall
2020-09-28 10:09       ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-28 10:39         ` Julien Grall
2020-10-10  9:49           ` Julien Grall
2020-10-10 10:04             ` Julien Grall
2020-09-29 11:10   ` Rahul Singh
2020-10-01  0:06   ` Stefano Stabellini [this message]
2020-10-01 15:09     ` Julien Grall
2020-09-26 20:55 ` [PATCH 2/4] xen/arm: acpi: The fixmap area should always be cleared during failure/unmap Julien Grall
2020-09-29 11:13   ` Rahul Singh
2020-10-01  0:30   ` Stefano Stabellini
2020-10-01 15:14     ` Julien Grall
2020-09-26 20:55 ` [PATCH 3/4] xen/arm: Check if the platform is not using ACPI before initializing Dom0less Julien Grall
2020-09-29 11:17   ` Rahul Singh
2020-09-30 23:26   ` Stefano Stabellini
2020-09-26 20:55 ` [PATCH 4/4] xen/arm: Introduce fw_unreserved_regions() and use it Julien Grall
2020-09-30 23:40   ` Stefano Stabellini
2020-10-01 15:34     ` Julien Grall
2020-09-27  1:47 ` [PATCH 0/4] xen/arm: Unbreak ACPI Elliott Mitchell
2020-09-29 15:28   ` Elliott Mitchell
2020-09-28  6:47 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-09-28 12:41   ` [PATCH] xen: acpi: Hide UART address only if SPCR exists Masami Hiramatsu
2020-09-28 12:42     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-01-19  7:25     ` Elliott Mitchell
2021-01-20 18:05       ` Julien Grall
2020-09-28 13:00   ` [PATCH 0/4] xen/arm: Unbreak ACPI Masami Hiramatsu
2020-10-16 22:33     ` Xen-ARM EFI/ACPI problems (was: Re: [PATCH 0/4] xen/arm: Unbreak ACPI) Elliott Mitchell
2020-10-17  5:12       ` Elliott Mitchell
2020-10-08 18:39   ` [PATCH 0/4] xen/arm: Unbreak ACPI Elliott Mitchell
2020-10-09  9:39     ` Julien Grall
2020-10-09 14:22       ` Elliott Mitchell
2020-10-09 18:15         ` Julien Grall
2020-10-09 22:36           ` Elliott Mitchell
2020-10-09 21:49   ` Elliott Mitchell
2020-10-10 11:02   ` Julien Grall
2020-10-12 19:02     ` Stefano Stabellini
2020-10-12 21:34       ` Elliott Mitchell
2020-10-14  1:06         ` Stefano Stabellini
2020-10-14  1:37           ` Elliott Mitchell
2020-10-14 17:47             ` Julien Grall
2020-10-15 18:00               ` Stefano Stabellini
2020-10-14 17:44       ` Julien Grall
2020-09-29 11:10 ` Rahul Singh
2020-09-29 15:29 ` Alex Bennée
2020-09-29 17:07   ` Julien Grall
2020-09-29 21:11     ` Alex Bennée
2020-09-29 23:39       ` André Przywara
2020-09-30  8:51         ` Alex Bennée
2020-09-30 10:35         ` Julien Grall
2020-09-30  9:42       ` Julien Grall
2020-09-30 10:38         ` Alex Bennée
2020-09-30 11:10           ` Julien Grall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.2009301659350.10908@sstabellini-ThinkPad-T480s \
    --to=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=bertrand.marquis@arm.com \
    --cc=ehem+xen@m5p.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=iwj@xenproject.org \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=jgrall@amazon.com \
    --cc=julien@xen.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu@linaro.org \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=wl@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).