From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63303C63777 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 21:28:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6A2A20857 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 21:28:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="DpdC9uqk" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E6A2A20857 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.41478.74646 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kjqik-0003LB-Bq; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 21:28:30 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 41478.74646; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 21:28:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kjqik-0003L4-76; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 21:28:30 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 41478; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 21:28:28 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kjqii-0003Kz-JG for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 21:28:28 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org (unknown [198.145.29.99]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 41fb2263-0a64-41c1-a950-60869ca0f168; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 21:28:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sstabellini-ThinkPad-T480s (c-24-130-65-46.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.130.65.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 247E62076A; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 21:28:26 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: 41fb2263-0a64-41c1-a950-60869ca0f168 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1606771707; bh=nRkhpXnGjHJGH3BKb1G/qP5N1PKFw4d6Y40Sy/kY1ps=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=DpdC9uqks5pPHPFDx2tEwTqEET2dzNOoklp05CrqT2LJiBmmRoUqE9evb4PSG+dBM KZMUi6Vln0PKwwrCPqooMjAb5F/lzBougs/eR0wrGwNGLSMYsQJTHfWXDVr/nfYuaL IPIwgah91UgCxyobhXyX32H4UNvRQPfYEvuvlE4s= Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 13:28:25 -0800 (PST) From: Stefano Stabellini X-X-Sender: sstabellini@sstabellini-ThinkPad-T480s To: Anthony PERARD cc: Eduardo Habkost , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Jiaxun Yang , Igor Mammedov , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Paolo Bonzini , Marcel Apfelbaum , Wainer dos Santos Moschetta , Aurelien Jarno , Thomas Huth , =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=C3=A9e?= , Aleksandar Rikalo , Richard Henderson , Fam Zheng , "Daniel P . Berrange" , Stefano Stabellini , Paul Durrant , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH-for-6.0 v4 15/17] gitlab-ci: Add test for Xen (on CentOS 7) In-Reply-To: <20201127142407.GC2098@perard.uk.xensource.com> Message-ID: References: <20201108204535.2319870-1-philmd@redhat.com> <20201108204535.2319870-16-philmd@redhat.com> <20201126173824.GB2098@perard.uk.xensource.com> <20201126174559.GP2271382@habkost.net> <20201127142407.GC2098@perard.uk.xensource.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Fri, 27 Nov 2020, Anthony PERARD wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 12:45:59PM -0500, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 05:38:24PM +0000, Anthony PERARD wrote: > > > Is `make check` going to do something useful with the Xen support? Or is > > > it going to need more work in order to test the Xen support of QEMU? > > > (Like starting an actual Xen guest.) > > > > I don't think it will test Xen support, but we still want to at > > least check if --enable-xen doesn't break anything else. > > That sound good. > > > Is there any public CI system anywhere where Xen support is > > tested today? > > Yes, we have osstest which regularly test Xen with QEMU from upstream. > Result are sent to xen-devel. But that might not be very useful for > qemu-devel. > > We also have a GitLab CI which does some Xen tests, but I don't think > QEMU is tested there. > https://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=blob;f=automation/gitlab-ci/test.yaml;hb=HEAD > https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen/ QEMU (the version of QEMU picked by the Xen tools) is built but not used in the Xen Project CI-loop yet. I am extending the CI-loop with more tests [1], and I would like to have at least one QEMU test at some point soon. Probably something based on Xen 9pfs. [1] https://marc.info/?l=xen-devel&m=160627845825763