From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D34C433B4 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 00:00:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EC83613BE for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 00:00:24 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9EC83613BE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.106340.203347 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lTvby-0002xo-L7; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 23:59:58 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 106340.203347; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 23:59:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lTvby-0002xh-IF; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 23:59:58 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 106340; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 23:59:56 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lTvbw-0002xc-GD for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 23:59:56 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org (unknown [198.145.29.99]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 6c297de3-5cdc-4712-a160-ba235a8187bb; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 23:59:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF34F613B9; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 23:59:53 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: 6c297de3-5cdc-4712-a160-ba235a8187bb DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1617753594; bh=OR9OcYc6YvrC6IDS8xbTnjc2Vdj0o0KpbzWyx/hD04g=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=IY1XUZtRTC9rqi7AqRviOghnSS2AyDI8F61iAY0gfgkl9DBzoGlKz6SJZKKY+XVC9 giBOt0PTnQ/wv9Tyeo1KCUklk0bVwT/kIeTs2Tp688nwC9nLMUoyo4GkYDsRjso2Jv iSNS/ooR4byb+ZP+E5NatwSNODkEuIZuSRpiWCWCKkTU055FByjWYOC/I0VA3l4bg5 e92vwVeMpEFN4Bhe8yd9sXTyuhUXeh+cTxrMmI5w3CJavbCqYzEhS89As+uhYOo5Rk EUfpoYjrRzpaI33QmPyT25JtNZ7lf6tMz0c1jrgqWkTM4SYmx8g4IdMVMtk0EJP5J3 h8cNsveAxHIZQ== Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 16:59:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Stefano Stabellini X-X-Sender: sstabellini@sstabellini-ThinkPad-T480s To: Julien Grall cc: Stefano Stabellini , xen-devel , Bertrand.Marquis@arm.com, Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com, rahul.singh@arm.com, brian.woods@xilinx.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Generic SMMU Bindings In-Reply-To: <80de3eb5-b338-af4e-42eb-d358f51d0bd7@xen.org> Message-ID: References: <80de3eb5-b338-af4e-42eb-d358f51d0bd7@xen.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Mon, 5 Apr 2021, Julien Grall wrote: > On 26/01/2021 22:58, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Hi all, > > Hi Stefano, > > > This series introduces support for the generic SMMU bindings to > > xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c. > > > > The last version of the series was > > https://marc.info/?l=xen-devel&m=159539053406643 > Some changes in the SMMU drivers went in recently. I believe this touched > similar area to this series. Would you be able to check that this series still > work as intented? Thanks for the heads up, no, unfortunately they don't work :-( They badly clash. I did the forward port of the three patches but they fail at runtime in my tests. I ran out of time to figure out what is the problem, and I'll have to pick it up at some point in the future (it might not be any time soon unfortunately). Rahul, if you have any ideas about what the problem is please let me know. This is the branch with the forward port: http://xenbits.xenproject.org/git-http/people/sstabellini/xen-unstable.git smmu-generic