On Wed, 15 Mar 2023, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 03:54:55PM +0800, Huang Rui wrote: > > From: Chen Jiqian > > > > Use new xc_physdev_gsi_from_irq to get the GSI number > > > > Signed-off-by: Chen Jiqian > > Signed-off-by: Huang Rui > > --- > > tools/libs/light/libxl_pci.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/tools/libs/light/libxl_pci.c b/tools/libs/light/libxl_pci.c > > index f4c4f17545..47cf2799bf 100644 > > --- a/tools/libs/light/libxl_pci.c > > +++ b/tools/libs/light/libxl_pci.c > > @@ -1486,6 +1486,7 @@ static void pci_add_dm_done(libxl__egc *egc, > > goto out_no_irq; > > } > > if ((fscanf(f, "%u", &irq) == 1) && irq) { > > + irq = xc_physdev_gsi_from_irq(ctx->xch, irq); > > This is just a shot in the dark, because I don't really have enough > context to understand what's going on here, but see below. > > I've taken a look at this on my box, and it seems like on > dom0 the value returned by /sys/bus/pci/devices/SBDF/irq is not > very consistent. > > If devices are in use by a driver the irq sysfs node reports either > the GSI irq or the MSI IRQ (in case a single MSI interrupt is > setup). > > It seems like pciback in Linux does something to report the correct > value: > > root@lcy2-dt107:~# cat /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:00\:14.0/irq > 74 > root@lcy2-dt107:~# xl pci-assignable-add 00:14.0 > root@lcy2-dt107:~# cat /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:00\:14.0/irq > 16 > > As you can see, making the device assignable changed the value > reported by the irq node to be the GSI instead of the MSI IRQ, I would > think you are missing something similar in the PVH setup (some pciback > magic)? > > Albeit I have no idea why you would need to translate from IRQ to GSI > in the way you do in this and related patches, because I'm missing the > context. As I mention in another email, also keep in mind that we need QEMU to work and QEMU calls: 1) xc_physdev_map_pirq (this is also called from libxl) 2) xc_domain_bind_pt_pci_irq In this case IRQ != GSI (IRQ == 112, GSI == 28). Sysfs returns the IRQ in Linux (112), but actually xc_physdev_map_pirq expects the GSI, not the IRQ. If you look at the implementation of xc_physdev_map_pirq, you'll the type is "MAP_PIRQ_TYPE_GSI" and also see the check in Xen xen/arch/x86/irq.c:allocate_and_map_gsi_pirq: if ( index < 0 || index >= nr_irqs_gsi ) { dprintk(XENLOG_G_ERR, "dom%d: map invalid irq %d\n", d->domain_id, index); return -EINVAL; } nr_irqs_gsi < 112, and the check will fail. So we need to pass the GSI to xc_physdev_map_pirq. To do that, we need to discover the GSI number corresponding to the IRQ number.