From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"George Dunlap" <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
"Wei Liu" <wl@xen.org>, "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 10/22] x86/CPUID: adjust extended leaves out of range clearing
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 16:50:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b274066d-b9b3-a60b-dc6b-64d9e380dffa@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <322de6db-e01f-0b57-5777-5d94a13c441a@suse.com>
A maximum extended leaf input value with the high half different from
0x8000 should not be considered valid - all leaves should be cleared in
this case.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
---
TBD: Andrew suggested to drop this patch, but that sub-thread still has
a loose end. Hence, until I'm convinced otherwise, I've retained
this patch here. I don't think it conflicts with any of the
subsequent ones.
---
v2: Integrate into series.
--- a/tools/tests/cpu-policy/test-cpu-policy.c
+++ b/tools/tests/cpu-policy/test-cpu-policy.c
@@ -519,11 +519,22 @@ static void test_cpuid_out_of_range_clea
},
},
{
+ .name = "no extd",
+ .nr_markers = 0,
+ .p = {
+ /* Clears all markers. */
+ .extd.max_leaf = 0,
+
+ .extd.vendor_ebx = 0xc2,
+ .extd.raw_fms = 0xc2,
+ },
+ },
+ {
.name = "extd",
.nr_markers = 1,
.p = {
/* Retains marker in leaf 0. Clears others. */
- .extd.max_leaf = 0,
+ .extd.max_leaf = 0x80000000,
.extd.vendor_ebx = 0xc2,
.extd.raw_fms = 0xc2,
--- a/xen/lib/x86/cpuid.c
+++ b/xen/lib/x86/cpuid.c
@@ -232,7 +232,9 @@ void x86_cpuid_policy_clear_out_of_range
ARRAY_SIZE(p->xstate.raw) - 1);
}
- zero_leaves(p->extd.raw, (p->extd.max_leaf & 0xffff) + 1,
+ zero_leaves(p->extd.raw,
+ ((p->extd.max_leaf >> 16) == 0x8000
+ ? (p->extd.max_leaf & 0xffff) + 1 : 0),
ARRAY_SIZE(p->extd.raw) - 1);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-22 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-22 14:38 [PATCH v3 00/22] xvmalloc() / x86 xstate area / x86 CPUID / AMX+XFD Jan Beulich
2021-04-22 14:43 ` [PATCH v3 01/22] mm: introduce xvmalloc() et al and use for grant table allocations Jan Beulich
2021-05-03 11:31 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-05-03 13:50 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-03 14:54 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-05-03 15:21 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-03 16:39 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-22 14:44 ` [PATCH v3 02/22] x86/xstate: use xvzalloc() for save area allocation Jan Beulich
2021-05-05 13:29 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-22 14:44 ` [PATCH v3 03/22] x86/xstate: re-size save area when CPUID policy changes Jan Beulich
2021-05-03 13:57 ` Andrew Cooper
2021-05-03 14:22 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-11 16:41 ` Andrew Cooper
2021-05-17 7:33 ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-22 14:45 ` [PATCH v3 04/22] x86/xstate: re-use valid_xcr0() for boot-time checks Jan Beulich
2021-05-03 11:53 ` Andrew Cooper
2021-04-22 14:45 ` [PATCH v3 05/22] x86/xstate: drop xstate_offsets[] and xstate_sizes[] Jan Beulich
2021-05-03 16:10 ` Andrew Cooper
2021-05-04 7:57 ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-22 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 06/22] x86/xstate: replace xsave_cntxt_size and drop XCNTXT_MASK Jan Beulich
2021-04-22 14:47 ` [PATCH v3 07/22] x86/xstate: avoid accounting for unsupported components Jan Beulich
2021-04-22 14:47 ` [PATCH v3 08/22] x86: use xvmalloc() for extended context buffer allocations Jan Beulich
2021-04-22 14:48 ` [PATCH v3 09/22] x86/xstate: enable AMX components Jan Beulich
2021-04-22 14:50 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2021-04-22 14:50 ` [PATCH v3 11/22] x86/CPUID: move bounding of max_{,sub}leaf fields to library code Jan Beulich
2021-04-22 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 12/22] x86/CPUID: enable AMX leaves Jan Beulich
2021-04-22 14:52 ` [PATCH v3 13/22] x86: XFD enabling Jan Beulich
2021-04-22 14:53 ` [PATCH v3 14/22] x86emul: introduce X86EMUL_FPU_{tilecfg,tile} Jan Beulich
2021-04-22 14:53 ` [PATCH v3 15/22] x86emul: support TILERELEASE Jan Beulich
2021-04-22 14:53 ` [PATCH v3 16/22] x86: introduce struct for TILECFG register Jan Beulich
2021-04-22 14:54 ` [PATCH v3 17/22] x86emul: support {LD,ST}TILECFG Jan Beulich
2021-04-22 14:55 ` [PATCH v3 18/22] x86emul: support TILEZERO Jan Beulich
2021-04-22 14:55 ` [PATCH v3 19/22] x86emul: support TILELOADD{,T1} and TILESTORE Jan Beulich
2021-04-22 15:06 ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-22 15:11 ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-26 7:12 ` Paul Durrant
2021-04-29 9:40 ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-22 14:56 ` [PATCH v3 20/22] x86emul: support tile multiplication insns Jan Beulich
2021-04-22 14:57 ` [PATCH v3 21/22] x86emul: test AMX insns Jan Beulich
2021-04-22 14:57 ` [PATCH v3 22/22] x86: permit guests to use AMX and XFD Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b274066d-b9b3-a60b-dc6b-64d9e380dffa@suse.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).