From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A12C433E6 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 19:05:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF4FA22D05 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 19:05:51 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DF4FA22D05 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xen.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.66720.118612 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kzlSY-0005Ba-OI; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 19:05:34 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 66720.118612; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 19:05:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kzlSY-0005BT-Kx; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 19:05:34 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 66720; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 19:05:32 +0000 Received: from mail.xenproject.org ([104.130.215.37]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kzlSW-0005BO-Md for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 19:05:32 +0000 Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kzlST-0002bU-DC; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 19:05:29 +0000 Received: from [54.239.6.185] (helo=a483e7b01a66.ant.amazon.com) by xenbits.xenproject.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kzlST-0007t6-5H; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 19:05:29 +0000 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xen.org; s=20200302mail; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject; bh=UlvrBiRosLrD+Yoq2QSheo/VESLE/1+8evyVtc+F2sg=; b=3loMaQVFUD00a8EZU/I0CAdeOM iDl1IVfH/3czc6QJxzDSfnmxFfWBH0nwd5QbqGk97+oMbPR3+a/Ft4Rx9eOL+fDMDFj0kVNhX8yGK UlfLNpOfZAU+R+zE1GbaqI1uPYSwM2G7FnCFL3tupfcyA1hti1uLtMaMt/mk7BQE/7nQ=; Subject: [PING] Re: [PATCH v2] xen/irq: Propagate the error from init_one_desc_irq() in init_*_irq_data() To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Jan Beulich , Andrew Cooper Cc: Julien Grall , Stefano Stabellini , Volodymyr Babchuk , =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=c3=a9?= , Wei Liu References: <20201128113642.8265-1-julien@xen.org> From: Julien Grall Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 19:05:27 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201128113642.8265-1-julien@xen.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi all, On 28/11/2020 11:36, Julien Grall wrote: > From: Julien Grall > > init_one_desc_irq() can return an error if it is unable to allocate > memory. While this is unlikely to happen during boot (called from > init_{,local_}irq_data()), it is better to harden the code by > propagting the return value. > > Spotted by coverity. > > CID: 106529 > > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall > Reviewed-by: Roger Paul Monné From my understanding of MAINTAINERS rule, I still need an ack from x86 maintainers. Cheers, -- Julien Grall