xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"Wei Liu" <wl@xen.org>, "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
	"Claudemir Todo Bom" <claudemir@todobom.com>,
	"Ian Jackson" <iwj@xenproject.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/4] x86/time: calibration rendezvous adjustments
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 13:53:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb7494b9-f4d1-f0c0-2fb2-5201559c1962@suse.com> (raw)

The middle two patches are meant to address a regression reported on
the list under "Problems with APIC on versions 4.9 and later (4.8
works)". In the course of analyzing output from a debugging patch I
ran into another anomaly again, which I thought I should finally try
to address. Hence patch 1. Patch 4 is new in v3 and RFC for now.

While looking closely at the corresponding debugging patch'es output I
noticed a suspicious drift between local and master stime: Measured not
very precisely, local was behind master by about 200ms in about half an
hour. Interestingly the recording of ->master_stime (and hence the not
really inexpensive invocation of read_platform_stime()) looks to be
pretty pointless when CONSTANT_TSC - I haven't been able to spot an
actual consumer. IOW the drift may not be a problem, and we might be
able to eliminate the platform timer reads. (When !CONSTANT_TSC, such
drift would get corrected anyway, by local_time_calibration().)

1: change initiation of the calibration timer
2: adjust time recording time_calibration_tsc_rendezvous()
3: don't move TSC backwards in time_calibration_tsc_rendezvous()
4: re-arrange struct calibration_rendezvous

Jan


             reply	other threads:[~2021-02-09 12:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-09 12:53 Jan Beulich [this message]
2021-02-09 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] x86/time: change initiation of the calibration timer Jan Beulich
2021-02-09 12:55 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] x86/time: adjust time recording in time_calibration_tsc_rendezvous() Jan Beulich
2021-02-09 12:55 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/time: don't move TSC backwards " Jan Beulich
2021-02-09 12:57 ` [PATCH RFC v3 4/4] x86/time: re-arrange struct calibration_rendezvous Jan Beulich
2021-02-24  9:29   ` Jan Beulich
2021-02-09 13:02 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] x86/time: calibration rendezvous adjustments Jan Beulich
2021-02-17  8:27   ` Ping: " Jan Beulich
2021-02-19 16:06 ` Ian Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bb7494b9-f4d1-f0c0-2fb2-5201559c1962@suse.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=claudemir@todobom.com \
    --cc=iwj@xenproject.org \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=wl@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).