From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54462C43331 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 14:11:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20C6E20722 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 14:11:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=citrix.com header.i=@citrix.com header.b="X1hZ+JCR" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 20C6E20722 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=citrix.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jH6kk-0006qb-51; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 14:11:30 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jH6kj-0006q1-97 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 14:11:29 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: 84f1355c-6ea2-11ea-b34e-bc764e2007e4 Received: from esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com (unknown [216.71.155.144]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 84f1355c-6ea2-11ea-b34e-bc764e2007e4; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 14:11:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=citrix.com; s=securemail; t=1585145488; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oJHuPy8YVX64cOHCh4EvAjVSh9fcgSV/J0qLjsaiK+k=; b=X1hZ+JCRFmF537LHCqO7+GFiYz8LA5iXClVkhtna37Ok3hzAiy3cIo+P qG5SG4QGmH3lm07SJ84IZhz1Etol5wWLIgmQ5g3BUoVUrh+zbOKYuxipg C4MqhZvpO/T+Ph05rQ41TyuF2hIVkcXOo+dmB67/PrEHDekjPhYbY12PM I=; Authentication-Results: esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=None smtp.pra=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@mail.citrix.com Received-SPF: None (esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of andrew.cooper3@citrix.com) identity=pra; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com"; x-sender="andrew.cooper3@citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: domain of Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com designates 162.221.158.21 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com"; x-sender="Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"; x-record-text="v=spf1 ip4:209.167.231.154 ip4:178.63.86.133 ip4:195.66.111.40/30 ip4:85.115.9.32/28 ip4:199.102.83.4 ip4:192.28.146.160 ip4:192.28.146.107 ip4:216.52.6.88 ip4:216.52.6.188 ip4:162.221.158.21 ip4:162.221.156.83 ip4:168.245.78.127 ~all" Received-SPF: None (esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail.citrix.com) identity=helo; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail.citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible IronPort-SDR: A1PPyh5CsjyzHyx57e+odKbO37hfNg1ckxSc7j+LOztaE5lM2VjwKom1VuvmMDqKp0QOH5s4fV D9hIJOIU/y0VYIgXuLCYS8CooBSuOlmw7i4YFa8OFhEbJJevzpzQF2N4ZRAosy4YvRTSk53Exu nZsDof/8qlxE9Fpa/iM/Fag1q1DJgDL24/975SJd/yHbu5s80ctxVXwqudhzc8vy5W6jOYgzfN 6hlldjQwZYskZQzwR2PNUYgzQg4xE6LRUIzBv7jaP2SpvrlcGRx/O65LhfQU+c+kAdcVNWv0l8 BSU= X-SBRS: 2.7 X-MesageID: 15265134 X-Ironport-Server: esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com X-Remote-IP: 162.221.158.21 X-Policy: $RELAYED X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,304,1580792400"; d="scan'208";a="15265134" To: Jan Beulich , "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" References: From: Andrew Cooper Message-ID: Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 14:11:24 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-GB X-ClientProxiedBy: AMSPEX02CAS01.citrite.net (10.69.22.112) To AMSPEX02CL02.citrite.net (10.69.22.126) Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/7] x86emul: vendor specific near indirect branch behavior in 64-bit mode X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Wei Liu , =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=c3=a9?= Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" On 24/03/2020 16:27, Jan Beulich wrote: > Intel CPUs ignore operand size overrides here, while AMD ones don't. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper