Re: [TESTDAY] Test report

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>]

Don Slutz <dslutz@verizon.com> wrote:
>* Hardware:
>
>SeaMicro*SM15000-XN*Quad Core Servers with Intel® Xeon® E3-1265Lv2
>processors (“Ivy Bridge” microarchitecture)
>
>1 server, 32G of memory.
>
>* Software:
>
>Fedora 17 (3.8.11-100.fc17.x86_64)
>CentOS release 5.10 (2.6.18-371.el5xen)
>
>* Guest operating systems:
>
>
>on Fedora 17: All HVM:
>
>
>vm:ubuntu-12.04.3-server-amd64
>Linux ubuntu 3.8.0-29-generic #42~precise1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 14
>16:19:23 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>vm:centos-5.9-x86_64
>Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.18-348.el5xen #1 SMP Tue Jan 8 18:35:04
>EST 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>vm:debian-7.2.0-amd64
>Linux debian 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.51-1 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>vm:rhel-6.4-x86_64
>Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.32-358.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jan 29
>11:47:41 EST 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>vm:centos-6.4-i386
>Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.32-358.el6.i686 #1 SMP Thu Feb 21
>21:50:49 UTC 2013 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>vm:centos-5.9-i386
>Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.18-348.el5xen #1 SMP Tue Jan 8 19:22:56
>EST 2013 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>vm:rhel-5.9-i386
>Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.18-348.el5xen #1 SMP Wed Nov 28
>22:04:26 EST 2012 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>vm:centos-6.4-x86_64
>Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.32-358.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Feb 22
>00:31:26 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>vm:rhel-6.4-i386
>Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.32-358.el6.i686 #1 SMP Tue Jan 29
>11:48:01 EST 2013 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>vm:rhel-5.9-x86_64
>Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.18-348.el5xen #1 SMP Wed Nov 28
>21:31:28 EST 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
>
>windows-server-2008-ENT-x86_64
>
>
>* Functionality tested:
>xl
>xl save
>xl restore
>
>
>* Comments:
>
>4.4.rc2 does not build on CentOS release 5.10:
>
>Need
>
>* 407a3c0 (origin/staging) compat/memory: fix build with old gcc
>
>and a newer upstream QEMU then qemu-xen-4.4.0-rc1
>
>* b97307e (HEAD, tag: qemu-xen-4.4.0-rc1, dummy) xen_disk: mark ioreq
>as mapped before unmapping in error case
>*   d84e452 Merge remote branch 'origin/stable-1.6' into
>xen-staging-master-9
>|\
>| * 62ecc3a (tag: v1.6.1) Update VERSION for 1.6.1 release
>
>
>Mail threads that are related:
>
>http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-01/msg01477.html
>
>http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-01/msg01520.html
>
>
>  
>[root@dcs-xen-54 ~]# xl save -p 6 /big/xl-save/centos-6.4-x86_64.0.save
>Saving to /big/xl-save/centos-6.4-x86_64.0.save new xl format (info
>0x0/0x0/560)
>xc: Saving memory: iter 0 (last sent 0 skipped 0): 1044481/1044481 
>100%
>[root@dcs-xen-54 ~]# xl unpause 6
>
>has left domain #6 in a bad disk state (on VGA):
>
>INFO: task jbd2/dm-0-8:386 blocked for more then 120 seconds.
>INFO: task sadc:22139 blocked for more then 120 seconds.
>
>
>However "xl restore -V /big/xl-save/centos-6.4-x86_64.0.save" looks to
>work fine.
>
>2nd time the unpause failed with:
>[root@dcs-xen-54 ~]# xl unpause 17
>
>WARNING: g.e. still in use!
>WARNING: g.e. still in use!
>WARNING: g.e. still in use!
>pm_op(): platform_pm_resume+0x0/0x50 returns -19
>PM: Device i8042 failed to resume: error -19
>INFO: task sadc:22164 blocked for more then 120 seconds.
>"echo 0 >..."
>INFO: task sadc:22164 blocked for more then 120 seconds.
>
>  
>[root@dcs-xen-54 ~]# xl des 17
>[root@dcs-xen-54 ~]# xl restore -V
>/big/xl-save/centos-6.4-x86_64.0.save
>
>
>Not sure if this is expected or not.

I think Ian saw this with the 'fast-cancel' something resume but I might be incorrect. Did it work if you used xend (you might have to configure it be enabled)?

>
>    -Don Slutz
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-devel mailing list
>Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
>http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel