xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rahul Singh <rahul.singh@arm.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: bertrand.marquis@arm.com, rahul.singh@arm.com,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>,
	Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/8] xen/arm: Remove support for MSI on SMMUv3
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:02:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cfc6cbe23f05162d5c62df9db09fef3f8e0b8e14.1606406359.git.rahul.singh@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1606406359.git.rahul.singh@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1606406359.git.rahul.singh@arm.com>

XEN does not support MSI on ARM platforms, therefore remove the MSI
support from SMMUv3 driver.

Signed-off-by: Rahul Singh <rahul.singh@arm.com>
---
 xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu-v3.c | 176 +-------------------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 173 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu-v3.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu-v3.c
index cec304e51a..401f7ae006 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu-v3.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu-v3.c
@@ -416,31 +416,6 @@ enum pri_resp {
 	PRI_RESP_SUCC = 2,
 };
 
-enum arm_smmu_msi_index {
-	EVTQ_MSI_INDEX,
-	GERROR_MSI_INDEX,
-	PRIQ_MSI_INDEX,
-	ARM_SMMU_MAX_MSIS,
-};
-
-static phys_addr_t arm_smmu_msi_cfg[ARM_SMMU_MAX_MSIS][3] = {
-	[EVTQ_MSI_INDEX] = {
-		ARM_SMMU_EVTQ_IRQ_CFG0,
-		ARM_SMMU_EVTQ_IRQ_CFG1,
-		ARM_SMMU_EVTQ_IRQ_CFG2,
-	},
-	[GERROR_MSI_INDEX] = {
-		ARM_SMMU_GERROR_IRQ_CFG0,
-		ARM_SMMU_GERROR_IRQ_CFG1,
-		ARM_SMMU_GERROR_IRQ_CFG2,
-	},
-	[PRIQ_MSI_INDEX] = {
-		ARM_SMMU_PRIQ_IRQ_CFG0,
-		ARM_SMMU_PRIQ_IRQ_CFG1,
-		ARM_SMMU_PRIQ_IRQ_CFG2,
-	},
-};
-
 struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent {
 	/* Common fields */
 	u8				opcode;
@@ -504,10 +479,6 @@ struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent {
 		} pri;
 
 		#define CMDQ_OP_CMD_SYNC	0x46
-		struct {
-			u32			msidata;
-			u64			msiaddr;
-		} sync;
 	};
 };
 
@@ -649,12 +620,6 @@ struct arm_smmu_device {
 
 	struct arm_smmu_strtab_cfg	strtab_cfg;
 
-	/* Hi16xx adds an extra 32 bits of goodness to its MSI payload */
-	union {
-		u32			sync_count;
-		u64			padding;
-	};
-
 	/* IOMMU core code handle */
 	struct iommu_device		iommu;
 };
@@ -945,20 +910,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(u64 *cmd, struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent)
 		cmd[1] |= FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_PRI_1_RESP, ent->pri.resp);
 		break;
 	case CMDQ_OP_CMD_SYNC:
-		if (ent->sync.msiaddr)
-			cmd[0] |= FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS, CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS_IRQ);
-		else
-			cmd[0] |= FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS, CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS_SEV);
-		cmd[0] |= FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_SYNC_0_MSH, ARM_SMMU_SH_ISH);
-		cmd[0] |= FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_SYNC_0_MSIATTR, ARM_SMMU_MEMATTR_OIWB);
-		/*
-		 * Commands are written little-endian, but we want the SMMU to
-		 * receive MSIData, and thus write it back to memory, in CPU
-		 * byte order, so big-endian needs an extra byteswap here.
-		 */
-		cmd[0] |= FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_SYNC_0_MSIDATA,
-				     cpu_to_le32(ent->sync.msidata));
-		cmd[1] |= ent->sync.msiaddr & CMDQ_SYNC_1_MSIADDR_MASK;
+		cmd[0] |= FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS, CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS_SEV);
 		break;
 	default:
 		return -ENOENT;
@@ -1054,50 +1006,6 @@ static void arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&smmu->cmdq.lock, flags);
 }
 
-/*
- * The difference between val and sync_idx is bounded by the maximum size of
- * a queue at 2^20 entries, so 32 bits is plenty for wrap-safe arithmetic.
- */
-static int __arm_smmu_sync_poll_msi(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sync_idx)
-{
-	ktime_t timeout;
-	u32 val;
-
-	timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), ARM_SMMU_CMDQ_SYNC_TIMEOUT_US);
-	val = smp_cond_load_acquire(&smmu->sync_count,
-				    (int)(VAL - sync_idx) >= 0 ||
-				    !ktime_before(ktime_get(), timeout));
-
-	return (int)(val - sync_idx) < 0 ? -ETIMEDOUT : 0;
-}
-
-static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_sync_msi(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
-{
-	u64 cmd[CMDQ_ENT_DWORDS];
-	unsigned long flags;
-	struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent  ent = {
-		.opcode = CMDQ_OP_CMD_SYNC,
-		.sync	= {
-			.msiaddr = virt_to_phys(&smmu->sync_count),
-		},
-	};
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&smmu->cmdq.lock, flags);
-
-	/* Piggy-back on the previous command if it's a SYNC */
-	if (smmu->prev_cmd_opcode == CMDQ_OP_CMD_SYNC) {
-		ent.sync.msidata = smmu->sync_nr;
-	} else {
-		ent.sync.msidata = ++smmu->sync_nr;
-		arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(cmd, &ent);
-		arm_smmu_cmdq_insert_cmd(smmu, cmd);
-	}
-
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&smmu->cmdq.lock, flags);
-
-	return __arm_smmu_sync_poll_msi(smmu, ent.sync.msidata);
-}
-
 static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
 {
 	u64 cmd[CMDQ_ENT_DWORDS];
@@ -1119,12 +1027,9 @@ static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
 static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
 {
 	int ret;
-	bool msi = (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_MSI) &&
-		   (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENCY);
 
-	ret = msi ? __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_sync_msi(smmu)
-		  : __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_sync(smmu);
-	if (ret)
+	ret = __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_sync(smmu);
+	if ( ret )
 		dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev, "CMD_SYNC timeout\n");
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -2898,83 +2803,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_update_gbpa(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 set, u32 clr)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void arm_smmu_free_msis(void *data)
-{
-	struct device *dev = data;
-	platform_msi_domain_free_irqs(dev);
-}
-
-static void arm_smmu_write_msi_msg(struct msi_desc *desc, struct msi_msg *msg)
-{
-	phys_addr_t doorbell;
-	struct device *dev = msi_desc_to_dev(desc);
-	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
-	phys_addr_t *cfg = arm_smmu_msi_cfg[desc->platform.msi_index];
-
-	doorbell = (((u64)msg->address_hi) << 32) | msg->address_lo;
-	doorbell &= MSI_CFG0_ADDR_MASK;
-
-	writeq_relaxed(doorbell, smmu->base + cfg[0]);
-	writel_relaxed(msg->data, smmu->base + cfg[1]);
-	writel_relaxed(ARM_SMMU_MEMATTR_DEVICE_nGnRE, smmu->base + cfg[2]);
-}
-
-static void arm_smmu_setup_msis(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
-{
-	struct msi_desc *desc;
-	int ret, nvec = ARM_SMMU_MAX_MSIS;
-	struct device *dev = smmu->dev;
-
-	/* Clear the MSI address regs */
-	writeq_relaxed(0, smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_GERROR_IRQ_CFG0);
-	writeq_relaxed(0, smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_EVTQ_IRQ_CFG0);
-
-	if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_PRI)
-		writeq_relaxed(0, smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_PRIQ_IRQ_CFG0);
-	else
-		nvec--;
-
-	if (!(smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_MSI))
-		return;
-
-	if (!dev->msi_domain) {
-		dev_info(smmu->dev, "msi_domain absent - falling back to wired irqs\n");
-		return;
-	}
-
-	/* Allocate MSIs for evtq, gerror and priq. Ignore cmdq */
-	ret = platform_msi_domain_alloc_irqs(dev, nvec, arm_smmu_write_msi_msg);
-	if (ret) {
-		dev_warn(dev, "failed to allocate MSIs - falling back to wired irqs\n");
-		return;
-	}
-
-	for_each_msi_entry(desc, dev) {
-		switch (desc->platform.msi_index) {
-		case EVTQ_MSI_INDEX:
-			smmu->evtq.q.irq = desc->irq;
-			break;
-		case GERROR_MSI_INDEX:
-			smmu->gerr_irq = desc->irq;
-			break;
-		case PRIQ_MSI_INDEX:
-			smmu->priq.q.irq = desc->irq;
-			break;
-		default:	/* Unknown */
-			continue;
-		}
-	}
-
-	/* Add callback to free MSIs on teardown */
-	devm_add_action(dev, arm_smmu_free_msis, dev);
-}
-
 static void arm_smmu_setup_unique_irqs(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
 {
 	int irq, ret;
 
-	arm_smmu_setup_msis(smmu);
-
 	/* Request interrupt lines */
 	irq = smmu->evtq.q.irq;
 	if (irq) {
@@ -3250,8 +3082,6 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_hw_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
 	if (reg & IDR0_SEV)
 		smmu->features |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_SEV;
 
-	if (reg & IDR0_MSI)
-		smmu->features |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_MSI;
 
 	if (reg & IDR0_HYP)
 		smmu->features |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_HYP;
-- 
2.17.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-26 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-26 17:01 [PATCH v2 0/8] xen/arm: Add support for SMMUv3 driver Rahul Singh
2020-11-26 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] xen/arm: Import the SMMUv3 driver from Linux Rahul Singh
2020-12-01 22:01   ` Stefano Stabellini
2020-11-26 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] xen/arm: revert atomic operation related command-queue insertion patch Rahul Singh
2020-12-01 22:23   ` Stefano Stabellini
2020-12-02 13:05     ` Rahul Singh
2020-12-02 13:44   ` Julien Grall
2020-12-03 11:49     ` Rahul Singh
2020-11-26 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] xen/arm: revert patch related to XArray Rahul Singh
2020-12-02  0:20   ` Stefano Stabellini
2020-12-02 13:46   ` Julien Grall
2020-12-03 12:57     ` Rahul Singh
2020-12-04  8:52       ` Julien Grall
2020-11-26 17:02 ` Rahul Singh [this message]
2020-12-02  0:33   ` [PATCH v2 4/8] xen/arm: Remove support for MSI on SMMUv3 Stefano Stabellini
2020-12-02  0:40     ` Stefano Stabellini
2020-12-02 13:12       ` Rahul Singh
2020-12-02 14:11         ` Julien Grall
2020-12-03 12:59           ` Rahul Singh
2020-11-26 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] xen/arm: Remove support for PCI ATS " Rahul Singh
2020-12-02  0:39   ` Stefano Stabellini
2020-12-02 13:07     ` Rahul Singh
2020-12-02 13:57   ` Julien Grall
2020-11-26 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] xen/arm: Remove support for Stage-1 translation " Rahul Singh
2020-12-02  0:53   ` Stefano Stabellini
2020-12-02 13:13     ` Rahul Singh
2020-11-26 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] xen/arm: Remove Linux specific code that is not usable in XEN Rahul Singh
2020-12-02  1:48   ` Stefano Stabellini
2020-12-02 14:34     ` Rahul Singh
2020-12-02 14:39       ` Julien Grall
2020-12-02 14:45   ` Julien Grall
2020-12-03 14:33     ` Rahul Singh
2020-12-04  9:05       ` Julien Grall
2020-12-07 10:36         ` Rahul Singh
2020-12-07 10:55           ` Julien Grall
2020-11-26 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] xen/arm: Add support for SMMUv3 driver Rahul Singh
2020-12-02  2:51   ` Stefano Stabellini
2020-12-02 16:27     ` Rahul Singh
2020-12-02 19:26       ` Rahul Singh
2020-12-02 16:47     ` Julien Grall
2020-12-03  4:13       ` Stefano Stabellini
2020-12-03 14:40         ` Rahul Singh
2020-12-03 18:47           ` Stefano Stabellini
2020-12-07  8:33             ` Rahul Singh
2020-12-02 16:22   ` Julien Grall
2020-12-07 12:12     ` Rahul Singh
2020-12-07 17:39       ` Julien Grall
2020-12-07 18:42         ` Rahul Singh
2020-12-08 19:05           ` Julien Grall
2020-12-09  1:19             ` Stefano Stabellini
2020-12-09  7:55               ` Bertrand Marquis
2020-12-09  9:18                 ` Julien Grall
2020-12-09 18:37                   ` Rahul Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cfc6cbe23f05162d5c62df9db09fef3f8e0b8e14.1606406359.git.rahul.singh@arm.com \
    --to=rahul.singh@arm.com \
    --cc=Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com \
    --cc=bertrand.marquis@arm.com \
    --cc=julien@xen.org \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).