From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC03C48BDF for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:31:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B123601FC for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:31:51 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7B123601FC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xen.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.142061.262254 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lt9AO-0003OW-T4; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:31:44 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 142061.262254; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:31:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lt9AO-0003OP-Q0; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:31:44 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 142061; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:31:43 +0000 Received: from mail.xenproject.org ([104.130.215.37]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lt9AN-0003OJ-T5 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:31:43 +0000 Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lt9AL-0003bn-Hs; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:31:41 +0000 Received: from [54.239.6.184] (helo=a483e7b01a66.ant.amazon.com) by xenbits.xenproject.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lt9AL-00065V-9R; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:31:41 +0000 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xen.org; s=20200302mail; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject; bh=xlCqE8Rdy/ipxraYFRkc51wKDzIJqQj3pxs4kIiB+yg=; b=OavsvzG97CH+FSxOHtxP6ftXiA XKLn+PiSFsJA7dwQLB4BYTKlO9PqfpD8OMHkxlsxaa1nSQLu4kAxOTbJo6J4PhT8loisGn9cRFLtt N/9ClsVy5c4XtpYgPRlf5i7EusAIDQolQMLnH6Li+6wAkVx4D9TIuPj+4CPoHwgZg3Ao=; Subject: PING Re: [XEN PATCH] libs/foreignmemory: Fix osdep_xenforeignmemory_map prototype To: Ian Jackson , Wei Liu Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Jan Beulich , Anthony PERARD References: <20210601154147.55799-1-anthony.perard@citrix.com> From: Julien Grall Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 15:31:38 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Ian & Wei, On 02/06/2021 10:25, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 01.06.2021 17:41, Anthony PERARD wrote: >> Commit cf8c4d3d13b8 made some preparation to have one day >> variable-length-array argument, but didn't declare the array in the >> function prototype the same way as in the function definition. And now >> GCC 11 complains about it. >> >> Fixes: cf8c4d3d13b8 ("tools/libs/foreignmemory: pull array length argument to map forward") >> Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD > > Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich > > Ian - this (or whichever alternative might be chosen to address gcc11's > valid complaint) also will want backporting. I was about to commit this patch and noticed that there is still a missing an ack from the tools maintainers. @Ian, @Wei, can you provide one? Cheers, -- Julien Grall