On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 11:58 +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 28.05.2020 16:55, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > 
> > Which means I will be treating HTs and CUs the same which, thinking
> > more about it (and thinking actually to CUs, rather than to any
> > cache
> > sharing relationship), does make sense for this feature.
> > 
> > Does this make sense, or am I missing or misinterpreting anything?
> 
> Well, it effectively answers the question I had raised: "What about
> HT
> vs AMD Fam15's CUs? Do you want both to be treated the same here?"
> 
Exactly! :-)

And, in fact, the answer is "Yes, I want them being treated the same,
and the patches are actually doing ".

Sorry for not getting it right away, and just replying like that in the
first place.

At least, this led to better (more generic) comments and variable names
in v2 of this patch.

Regards
-- 
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D
http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Virtualization Software Engineer
SUSE Labs, SUSE https://www.suse.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------
<<This happens because _I_ choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)