On Wed, 2019-09-11 at 16:22 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 09.09.19 15:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 09.08.2019 16:58, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > --- a/xen/common/schedule.c
> > > +++ b/xen/common/schedule.c
> > > @@ -368,14 +368,52 @@ static struct sched_unit
> > > *sched_alloc_unit(struct vcpu *v)
> > >       return NULL;
> > >   }
> > >   
> > > -int sched_init_vcpu(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int processor)
> > > +static unsigned int sched_select_initial_cpu(const struct vcpu
> > > *v)
> > 
> > Given the response on an earlier similar question, I don't suppose
> > I could talk you into dropping the sched_ prefix here?
> 
> I like it better with prefix. Any opinions by the scheduler
> maintainers?
> 
I do like it with prefix better too.

Regards
-- 
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D
http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Virtualization Software Engineer
SUSE Labs, SUSE https://www.suse.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------
<<This happens because _I_ choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)