From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Stanislav Spassov <stanspas@amazon.de>,
Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] pci: clear host_maskall field on assign
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 09:38:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e31ebe3d-3aa8-dafd-1104-54fcaf1a4896@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191004235855.GA10634@gao-cwp>
On 05.10.2019 01:58, Chao Gao wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 12:49:35PM +0200, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>> The current implementation of host_maskall makes it sticky across
>> assign and deassign calls, which means that once a guest forces Xen to
>> set host_maskall the maskall bit is not going to be cleared until a
>> call to PHYSDEVOP_prepare_msix is performed. Such call however
>> shouldn't be part of the normal flow when doing PCI passthrough, and
>> hence the flag needs to be cleared when assigning in order to prevent
>> host_maskall being carried over from previous assignations.
>>
>> Note that other mask fields, like guest_masked or the entry maskbit
>> are already reset when the msix capability is initialized. Also note
>> that doing the reset of host_maskall there would allow the guest to
>> reset such field by enabling and disabling MSIX, which is not
>> intended.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
>> ---
>> Cc: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
>> Cc: "Spassov, Stanislav" <stanspas@amazon.de>
>> Cc: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@iki.fi>
>> ---
>> Chao, Stanislav, can you please check if this patch fixes your
>> issues?
>
> I am glad to. For your testing, you can just kill qemu and destroy the
> guest. Then maskall bit of a pass-thru device will be set. And in this
> case, try to recreate the guest and check whether the maskall bit is
> cleared in guest.
>
> The solution is similar to my v1 [1]. One question IMO (IIRC, it is why
> I changed to another approach) is: why not do such reset at deivce
> deassignment such that dom0 can use a clean device. Otherwise, the
> device won't work after being unbound from pciback. But I am not so
> sure, I can check it next Tuesday.
I too did think about this, but aiui pciback needs to issue
PHYSDEVOP_release_msix anyway, and Dom0 would then re-setup MSI-X
"from scratch", i.e. we'd clear the flag anyway in
msix_capability_init() due to msix->used_entries being zero at
the first (of possibly several) invocation(s).
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-07 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-02 10:49 [Xen-devel] [PATCH] pci: clear host_maskall field on assign Roger Pau Monne
2019-10-02 13:33 ` Jan Beulich
2019-10-08 9:23 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-10-08 9:42 ` Jan Beulich
2019-10-08 11:09 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-10-08 11:28 ` Jan Beulich
2019-10-08 13:14 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-10-08 13:32 ` Jan Beulich
2019-10-08 14:16 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-10-08 14:21 ` Jan Beulich
2019-10-04 23:58 ` Chao Gao
2019-10-07 7:38 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2019-10-08 6:18 ` Chao Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e31ebe3d-3aa8-dafd-1104-54fcaf1a4896@suse.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=stanspas@amazon.de \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).