On Tue, 2019-08-13 at 19:43 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 8/13/19 6:34 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-08-13 at 17:52 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > 
> > So, unless the flag gets cleared again, or something else happens
> > that
> > makes the vCPU(s) fail the vcpu_runnable() check in
> > domain_unpause()->vcpu_wake(), I don't see why the wakeup that let
> > the
> > null scheduler start scheduling the vCPU doesn't happen... as it
> > instead does on x86 or !dom0less ARM (because, as far as I've
> > understood, it's only dom0less that doesn't work, it this correct?)
> 
> Yes, I quickly tried to use NULL scheduler with just dom0 and it
> boots.
> 
Ok.

> Interestingly, I can't see the log:
> 
> (XEN) Freed 328kB init memory.
> 
> This is called as part of init_done before CPU0 goes into the idle
> loop.
> 
> Adding more debug, it is getting stuck when calling 
> domain_unpause_by_controller for dom0. Specifically vcpu_wake on
> dom0v0.
> 
Wait... Is this also with just dom0, or when trying dom0less with some
domUs?

> The loop to assign a pCPU in null_vcpu_wake() is turning into an 
> infinite loop. Indeed the loop is trying to pick CPU0 for dom0v0 that
> is 
> already used by dom1v0. So the problem is in pick_cpu() or the data
> used 
> by it.
> 
Ah, interesting...

> It feels to me this is an affinity problem. Note that I didn't
> request 
> to pin dom0 vCPUs.
> 
Yep, looking better, I think I've seen something suspicious now. I'll
send another debug patch.

Regards
-- 
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D
http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Virtualization Software Engineer
SUSE Labs, SUSE https://www.suse.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------
<<This happens because _I_ choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)