xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xen-pciback: simplify vpci's find hook
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 11:50:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea274ffe-4eee-9fa5-b5d1-e8528b112227@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e9f358bc-e957-e039-235c-6a9f68328554@oracle.com>

On 09.04.2021 23:45, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 4/7/21 10:37 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> There's no point in comparing SBDF - we can simply compare the struct
>> pci_dev pointers. If they weren't the same for a given device, we'd have
>> bigger problems from having stored a stale pointer.
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>

Thanks. As the 1st patch of this series still looks to have an unclear
disposition (unless not getting back a reply on my responses to your
comments means silent agreement), I can't predict yet when I'd be able
to submit v2. Hence I'd like to point out that this patch is
independent of the former two, and hence would need to wait further if
you wanted to apply it. After all this one (unlike the other two) is
merely cleanup, and hence would rather want to go in during a merge


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-12  9:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-07 14:35 [PATCH 0/3] xen-pciback: a fix, a workaround, and some simplification Jan Beulich
2021-04-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] xen-pciback: redo VF placement in the virtual topology Jan Beulich
2021-04-08 22:28   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2021-04-09  8:16     ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] xen-pciback: reconfigure also from backend watch handler Jan Beulich
2021-04-09 21:43   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2021-04-12  9:44     ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-12 15:55       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2021-04-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] xen-pciback: simplify vpci's find hook Jan Beulich
2021-04-09 21:45   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2021-04-12  9:50     ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2021-04-12 16:05       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2021-04-13  8:09         ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-13 12:54           ` Boris Ostrovsky
2021-04-23  8:05   ` Juergen Gross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ea274ffe-4eee-9fa5-b5d1-e8528b112227@suse.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).