From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, anthony.perard@citrix.com
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [edk2-devel] [PATCH v5 23/35] OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei: Rework memory detection
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 11:26:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ebb5fc74-219f-99f2-62ea-268a6ced2935@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190813113119.14804-24-anthony.perard@citrix.com>
On 08/13/19 13:31, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> When running as a Xen PVH guest, there is no CMOS to read the memory
> size from. Rework GetSystemMemorySize(Below|Above)4gb() so they can
> work without CMOS by reading the e820 table.
>
> Rework XenPublishRamRegions to also care for the reserved and ACPI
> entry in the e820 table. The region that was added by InitializeXen()
> isn't needed as that same entry is in the e820 table provided by
> hvmloader.
>
> MTRR settings aren't modified anymore, on HVM it's already done by
> hvmloader, on PVH it is supposed to have sane default. MTRR will need
> to be done properly but keeping what's already been done by programs
> that have run before OVMF will do for now.
>
> Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1689
> Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
> Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v5:
> - fix coding style
> - fix typo in commit message
> - Handle all possible cases of a E820 reserved range overlapping with the
> LAPIC range.
>
> v4:
> - some coding style
> - Added AddReservedMemoryRangeHob, and using it.
> - this patch now replace "OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei: Reserve hvmloader's memory only when it has run"
> from v3. hvmloader have added an entry in the e820 table, there is no
> need for a special case.
> - now, everything that is in the e820 table is added to OVMF's memory
> map, no more skipping ACPI entries or hvmloader's reserved entries.
> Instead, we look for the local APIC region and avoid it if it is
> present in the e820.
> - rework commit message
>
> OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/Platform.h | 13 ++++++
> OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/MemDetect.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/Platform.c | 11 +++++
> OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/Xen.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 4 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/Platform.h b/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/Platform.h
> index db9a62572f..7661f4a8de 100644
> --- a/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/Platform.h
> +++ b/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/Platform.h
> @@ -44,6 +44,13 @@ AddReservedMemoryBaseSizeHob (
> BOOLEAN Cacheable
> );
>
> +VOID
> +AddReservedMemoryRangeHob (
> + EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS MemoryBase,
> + EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS MemoryLimit,
> + BOOLEAN Cacheable
> + );
> +
> VOID
> AddressWidthInitialization (
> VOID
> @@ -114,6 +121,12 @@ XenPublishRamRegions (
> VOID
> );
>
> +EFI_STATUS
> +XenGetE820Map (
> + EFI_E820_ENTRY64 **Entries,
> + UINT32 *Count
> + );
> +
> extern EFI_BOOT_MODE mBootMode;
>
> extern UINT8 mPhysMemAddressWidth;
> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/MemDetect.c b/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/MemDetect.c
> index cf95f9c474..1f81eee407 100644
> --- a/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/MemDetect.c
> +++ b/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/MemDetect.c
> @@ -96,6 +96,45 @@ Q35TsegMbytesInitialization (
> mQ35TsegMbytes = ExtendedTsegMbytes;
> }
>
> +STATIC
> +UINT64
> +GetHighestSystemMemoryAddress (
> + BOOLEAN Below4gb
> + )
> +{
> + EFI_E820_ENTRY64 *E820Map;
> + UINT32 E820EntriesCount;
> + EFI_E820_ENTRY64 *Entry;
> + EFI_STATUS Status;
> + UINT32 Loop;
> + UINT64 HighestAddress;
> + UINT64 EntryEnd;
> +
> + HighestAddress = 0;
> +
> + Status = XenGetE820Map (&E820Map, &E820EntriesCount);
> + ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> +
> + for (Loop = 0; Loop < E820EntriesCount; Loop++) {
> + Entry = E820Map + Loop;
> + EntryEnd = Entry->BaseAddr + Entry->Length;
> +
> + if (Entry->Type == EfiAcpiAddressRangeMemory &&
> + EntryEnd > HighestAddress) {
> +
> + if (Below4gb && (EntryEnd <= BASE_4GB)) {
> + HighestAddress = EntryEnd;
> + } else if (!Below4gb && (EntryEnd >= BASE_4GB)) {
> + HighestAddress = EntryEnd;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + //
> + // Round down the end address.
> + //
> + return HighestAddress & ~(UINT64)EFI_PAGE_MASK;
> +}
>
> UINT32
> GetSystemMemorySizeBelow4gb (
> @@ -105,6 +144,19 @@ GetSystemMemorySizeBelow4gb (
> UINT8 Cmos0x34;
> UINT8 Cmos0x35;
>
> + //
> + // In PVH case, there is no CMOS, we have to calculate the memory size
> + // from parsing the E820
> + //
> + if (XenPvhDetected ()) {
> + UINT64 HighestAddress;
> +
> + HighestAddress = GetHighestSystemMemoryAddress (TRUE);
> + ASSERT (HighestAddress > 0 && HighestAddress <= BASE_4GB);
> +
> + return HighestAddress;
> + }
> +
> //
> // CMOS 0x34/0x35 specifies the system memory above 16 MB.
> // * CMOS(0x35) is the high byte
> @@ -129,6 +181,23 @@ GetSystemMemorySizeAbove4gb (
> UINT32 Size;
> UINTN CmosIndex;
>
> + //
> + // In PVH case, there is no CMOS, we have to calculate the memory size
> + // from parsing the E820
> + //
> + if (XenPvhDetected ()) {
> + UINT64 HighestAddress;
> +
> + HighestAddress = GetHighestSystemMemoryAddress (FALSE);
> + ASSERT (HighestAddress == 0 || HighestAddress >= BASE_4GB);
> +
> + if (HighestAddress >= BASE_4GB) {
> + HighestAddress -= BASE_4GB;
> + }
> +
> + return HighestAddress;
> + }
> +
> //
> // CMOS 0x5b-0x5d specifies the system memory above 4GB MB.
> // * CMOS(0x5d) is the most significant size byte
> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/Platform.c b/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/Platform.c
> index 6aaafc3ee9..2f42ca6ccd 100644
> --- a/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/Platform.c
> +++ b/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/Platform.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,17 @@ AddReservedMemoryBaseSizeHob (
> );
> }
>
> +VOID
> +AddReservedMemoryRangeHob (
> + EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS MemoryBase,
> + EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS MemoryLimit,
> + BOOLEAN Cacheable
> + )
> +{
> + AddReservedMemoryBaseSizeHob (MemoryBase,
> + (UINT64)(MemoryLimit - MemoryBase), Cacheable);
> +}
> +
> VOID
> AddIoMemoryRangeHob (
> EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS MemoryBase,
> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/Xen.c b/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/Xen.c
> index 72f6f37b46..c4506def9a 100644
> --- a/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/Xen.c
> +++ b/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/Xen.c
> @@ -276,9 +276,14 @@ XenPublishRamRegions (
> VOID
> )
> {
> - EFI_E820_ENTRY64 *E820Map;
> - UINT32 E820EntriesCount;
> - EFI_STATUS Status;
> + EFI_E820_ENTRY64 *E820Map;
> + UINT32 E820EntriesCount;
> + EFI_STATUS Status;
> + EFI_E820_ENTRY64 *Entry;
> + UINTN Index;
> + UINT64 LapicBase;
> + UINT64 LapicEnd;
> +
>
The extra newline is not really justified, but it's also harmless and not too annoying.
Otherwise, the update looks good to me, addressing:
* http://mid.mail-archive.com/7b8cb5ef-2163-9e22-350f-877be6951b34@redhat.com
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/44615
* http://mid.mail-archive.com/20190807152852.e47kogsxubbjkue5@Air-de-Roger
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/45012
So my ACK stands.
Thanks
Laszlo
> DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "Using memory map provided by Xen\n"));
>
> @@ -287,26 +292,60 @@ XenPublishRamRegions (
> //
> E820EntriesCount = 0;
> Status = XenGetE820Map (&E820Map, &E820EntriesCount);
> -
> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
>
> - if (E820EntriesCount > 0) {
> - EFI_E820_ENTRY64 *Entry;
> - UINT32 Loop;
> + LapicBase = PcdGet32 (PcdCpuLocalApicBaseAddress);
> + LapicEnd = LapicBase + SIZE_1MB;
> + AddIoMemoryRangeHob (LapicBase, LapicEnd);
>
> - for (Loop = 0; Loop < E820EntriesCount; Loop++) {
> - Entry = E820Map + Loop;
> + for (Index = 0; Index < E820EntriesCount; Index++) {
> + UINT64 Base;
> + UINT64 End;
> + UINT64 ReservedBase;
> + UINT64 ReservedEnd;
>
> + Entry = &E820Map[Index];
> +
> + //
> + // Round up the start address, and round down the end address.
> + //
> + Base = ALIGN_VALUE (Entry->BaseAddr, (UINT64)EFI_PAGE_SIZE);
> + End = (Entry->BaseAddr + Entry->Length) & ~(UINT64)EFI_PAGE_MASK;
> +
> + switch (Entry->Type) {
> + case EfiAcpiAddressRangeMemory:
> + AddMemoryRangeHob (Base, End);
> + break;
> + case EfiAcpiAddressRangeACPI:
> + AddReservedMemoryRangeHob (Base, End, FALSE);
> + break;
> + case EfiAcpiAddressRangeReserved:
> //
> - // Only care about RAM
> + // hvmloader marks a range that overlaps with the local APIC memory
> + // mapped region as reserved, but CpuDxe wants it as mapped IO. We
> + // have already added it as mapped IO, so skip it here.
> //
> - if (Entry->Type != EfiAcpiAddressRangeMemory) {
> - continue;
> - }
>
> - AddMemoryBaseSizeHob (Entry->BaseAddr, Entry->Length);
> + //
> + // add LAPIC predecessor range, if any
> + //
> + ReservedBase = Base;
> + ReservedEnd = MIN (End, LapicBase);
> + if (ReservedBase < ReservedEnd) {
> + AddReservedMemoryRangeHob (ReservedBase, ReservedEnd, FALSE);
> + }
>
> - MtrrSetMemoryAttribute (Entry->BaseAddr, Entry->Length, CacheWriteBack);
> + //
> + // add LAPIC successor range, if any
> + //
> + ReservedBase = MAX (Base, LapicEnd);
> + ReservedEnd = End;
> + if (ReservedBase < ReservedEnd) {
> + AddReservedMemoryRangeHob (ReservedBase, ReservedEnd, FALSE);
> + }
> + break;
> + default:
> + break;
> }
> }
> }
> @@ -326,12 +365,6 @@ InitializeXen (
> {
> RETURN_STATUS PcdStatus;
>
> - //
> - // Reserve away HVMLOADER reserved memory [0xFC000000,0xFD000000).
> - // This needs to match HVMLOADER RESERVED_MEMBASE/RESERVED_MEMSIZE.
> - //
> - AddReservedMemoryBaseSizeHob (0xFC000000, 0x1000000, FALSE);
> -
> PcdStatus = PcdSetBoolS (PcdPciDisableBusEnumeration, TRUE);
> ASSERT_RETURN_ERROR (PcdStatus);
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-15 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-13 11:30 [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 00/35] Specific platform to run OVMF in Xen PVH and HVM guests Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:30 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 01/35] OvmfPkg/ResetSystemLib: Add missing dependency on PciLib Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:30 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 02/35] OvmfPkg: Create platform OvmfXen Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:30 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 03/35] OvmfPkg: Introduce XenResetVector Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:30 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 04/35] OvmfPkg: Introduce XenPlatformPei Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:30 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 05/35] OvmfPkg/OvmfXen: Creating an ELF header Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:30 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 06/35] OvmfPkg/XenResetVector: Add new entry point for Xen PVH Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:30 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 07/35] OvmfPkg/XenResetVector: Saving start of day pointer for PVH guests Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:30 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 08/35] OvmfPkg/XenResetVector: Allow jumpstart from either hvmloader or PVH Anthony PERARD
2019-08-21 16:31 ` [Xen-devel] [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-08-13 11:30 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 09/35] OvmfPkg/OvmfXen: use a TimerLib instance that depends only on the CPU Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:30 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 10/35] OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei: Detect OVMF_INFO from hvmloader Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:30 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 11/35] OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei: Use mXenHvmloaderInfo to get E820 Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:30 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 12/35] OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei: Grab RSDP from PVH guest start of day struct Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:30 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 13/35] OvmfPkg/Library/XenPlatformLib: New library Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:30 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 14/35] OvmfPkg/AcpiPlatformDxe: Use XenPlatformLib Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:30 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 15/35] OvmfPkg/AcpiPlatformDxe: Use Xen PVH RSDP if it exist Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:31 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 16/35] OvmfPkg/XenHypercallLib: Enable it in PEIM Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:31 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 17/35] OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei: Reinit XenHypercallLib Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:31 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 18/35] OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei: Introduce XenHvmloaderDetected Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:31 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 19/35] OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei: Setup HyperPages earlier Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:31 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 20/35] OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei: Introduce XenPvhDetected Anthony PERARD
2019-08-15 8:54 ` [Xen-devel] [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-08-13 11:31 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 21/35] OvmfPkg: Import XENMEM_memory_map hypercall to Xen/memory.h Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:31 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 22/35] OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei: no hvmloader: get the E820 table via hypercall Anthony PERARD
2019-08-15 8:59 ` [Xen-devel] [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-08-13 11:31 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 23/35] OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei: Rework memory detection Anthony PERARD
2019-08-15 9:26 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2019-08-13 11:31 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 24/35] OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei: Reserve VGA memory region, to boot Linux Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:31 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 25/35] OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei: Ignore missing PCI Host Bridge on Xen PVH Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:31 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 26/35] OvmfPkg/XenPlatformLib: Cache result for XenDetected Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:31 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 27/35] OvmfPkg/PlatformBootManagerLib: Use XenDetected from XenPlatformLib Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:31 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 28/35] OvmfPkg/PlatformBootManagerLib: Handle the absence of PCI bus on Xen PVH Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:31 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 29/35] OvmfPkg/OvmfXen: Override PcdFSBClock to Xen vLAPIC timer frequency Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:31 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 30/35] OvmfPkg/OvmfXen: Introduce XenTimerDxe Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:31 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 31/35] OvmfPkg/PlatformBootManagerLib: Use a Xen console for ConOut/ConIn Anthony PERARD
2019-08-15 9:35 ` [Xen-devel] [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-08-13 11:31 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 32/35] OvmfPkg: Introduce PcdXenGrantFrames Anthony PERARD
2019-08-15 9:40 ` [Xen-devel] [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-08-15 9:45 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-08-13 11:31 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 33/35] OvmfPkg: Introduce XenIoPvhDxe to initialize Grant Tables Anthony PERARD
2019-08-15 9:42 ` [Xen-devel] [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-08-13 11:31 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 34/35] OvmfPkg: Move XenRealTimeClockLib from ArmVirtPkg Anthony PERARD
2019-08-13 11:31 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 35/35] OvmfPkg/OvmfXen: use RealTimeClockRuntimeDxe from EmbeddedPkg Anthony PERARD
2019-08-15 11:03 ` [Xen-devel] [edk2-devel] [PATCH v5 00/35] Specific platform to run OVMF in Xen PVH and HVM guests Laszlo Ersek
2019-08-21 16:16 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ebb5fc74-219f-99f2-62ea-268a6ced2935@redhat.com \
--to=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=devel@edk2.groups.io \
--cc=jordan.l.justen@intel.com \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).