From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 124B5C2BA19 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 10:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D75AD20737 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 10:51:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=xen.org header.i=@xen.org header.b="AtXCFLud" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D75AD20737 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xen.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jOfd6-0005J0-Qx; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 10:50:52 +0000 Received: from all-amaz-eas1.inumbo.com ([34.197.232.57] helo=us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jOfd5-0005Iu-TW for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 10:50:51 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: f8ec7eb6-7f06-11ea-8a2e-12813bfff9fa Received: from mail.xenproject.org (unknown [104.130.215.37]) by us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id f8ec7eb6-7f06-11ea-8a2e-12813bfff9fa; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 10:50:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xen.org; s=20200302mail; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Content-Type: References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=wxLnGTPGz04zsEyi0EroQJbAWZRX1iOLm9OqENiSLtM=; b=AtXCFLudnpeZf1zX6WreoQYyDn pkpim0HYQBiW0brJaUpAPmVuKX9RZvTAaLB+pgk5+frUOw1UVCAdAc3dwqXKd+4RW0UgC3tC73eJx F4hf2KOdGsJFjomRTYBFjQHRNPXdK3YGwq6n5R1YZW7FMpyd0Me54xCxHUARi1sBNsDw=; Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jOfd4-0000pR-CW; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 10:50:50 +0000 Received: from 54-240-197-226.amazon.com ([54.240.197.226] helo=edge-m1-r3-181.e-iad16.amazon.com) by xenbits.xenproject.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jOfd4-0003j9-2G; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 10:50:50 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: drop unnecessary page table walking in compat r/o M2P handling From: Hongyan Xia To: Jan Beulich Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 11:50:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: <013b0d15-6901-bb87-6b0d-9233f9bf50e6@suse.com> References: <91728ed9a191160e6405267f5ae05cb6d3724f22.1586352238.git.hongyxia@amazon.com> <61746eff-0033-ccd7-6d77-3aabb8a426c8@suse.com> <013b0d15-6901-bb87-6b0d-9233f9bf50e6@suse.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Roger Pau =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Monn=E9?= , julien@xen.org, Wei Liu , Andrew Cooper Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 12:34 +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 15.04.2020 11:59, Hongyan Xia wrote: > > ... > > I would like to drop relevant map/unmap patches and replace them > > with > > the new clean-up ones (and place them at the beginning of the > > series), > > if there is no objection with that. > > Depending on turnaround, I'd much rather see this go in before > you re-post. But if you feel like making it part of your series, > go ahead. I actually also very much prefer to see those clean-up patches go in before I post the next revision, so please go ahead. I will post the next revision minus patch 4 then to avoid conflict. Hongyan