All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Cc: Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, newren@gmail.com, vdye@github.com,
	Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Sparse index: fetch, pull, ls-files
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 14:13:17 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqfsrtw1s2.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <08679a6f-51c1-0e48-9dcc-e7ac4c9a9c80@gmail.com> (Derrick Stolee's message of "Wed, 17 Nov 2021 10:28:22 -0500")

Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> writes:

>> But what makes sure, after all of the above happens, that no new
>> changes that assume it can walk the full index enters in the
>> codebase?
>> 
>> In other words, after "fetch" is declared "sparse clean" with patch
>> [1/2], what effort from us will it take to stay clean?
>
> The tests in t1092 that use the "ensure_not_expanded" helper are
> intended to be regression tests that would start failing if the
> sparse index starts expanding in a new way. I think this is what
> you mean by staying "sparse clean".

It is more like how would we help a new piece of code, which does
not even consider the possibility that the in-core index might be
sparse, and instead blindly walks the in-core index entries, doing
something unexpected (to both the author of the new code and to
those who are aware of the sparse-index feature) when it sees an
"tree" entry.  We'll hopefully see a breakage and the developer who
added such a new piece of code can keep both halves?

> One direction I could see is that as new features are contributed
> that change how the index is used, these features are not
> automatically tested with sparse-checkout and the sparse index.
> In this case, we will need to increase our awareness when reviewing
> such features to ensure that they could fit within the sparse index
> model (or are sufficiently protected by ensure_full_index() in their
> first version).

Yup, making developers aware of the issue is probably the good first
thing to do.


  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-18 22:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-16 15:38 [PATCH 0/2] Sparse index: fetch, pull, ls-files Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-11-16 15:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] fetch/pull: use the sparse index Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-11-16 15:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] ls-files: add --sparse option Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-11-22 18:36   ` Elijah Newren
2021-11-22 19:44     ` Derrick Stolee
2021-11-23  2:07   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-08 15:14     ` Derrick Stolee
2021-12-08 15:20       ` Derrick Stolee
2021-12-08 17:04       ` Elijah Newren
2021-12-08 18:23         ` Derrick Stolee
2021-12-08 18:36           ` Elijah Newren
2021-12-08 19:06             ` Derrick Stolee
2021-12-09 12:50               ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-10 13:57                 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-12-10 15:13                   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-13 19:16                   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-12-16 14:11                     ` Derrick Stolee
2021-11-17  9:29 ` [PATCH 0/2] Sparse index: fetch, pull, ls-files Junio C Hamano
2021-11-17 15:28   ` Derrick Stolee
2021-11-18 22:13     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2021-11-23  1:57 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-08 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-12-08 19:39   ` [PATCH v2 1/5] fetch/pull: use the sparse index Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-12-08 19:39   ` [PATCH v2 2/5] ls-files: add --sparse option Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-12-09  5:08     ` Elijah Newren
2021-12-10 13:51       ` Derrick Stolee
2021-12-08 19:39   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] t1092: replace 'read-cache --table' with 'ls-files --sparse' Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-12-09  5:19     ` Elijah Newren
2021-12-08 19:39   ` [PATCH v2 4/5] t1091/t3705: remove 'test-tool read-cache --table' Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-12-09  5:20     ` Elijah Newren
2021-12-08 19:39   ` [PATCH v2 5/5] test-read-cache: remove --table, --expand options Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-12-09  5:23   ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Sparse index: fetch, pull, ls-files Elijah Newren
2021-12-10 15:13   ` [PATCH v3 " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-12-10 15:13     ` [PATCH v3 1/5] fetch/pull: use the sparse index Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-12-10 15:13     ` [PATCH v3 2/5] ls-files: add --sparse option Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-12-10 15:13     ` [PATCH v3 3/5] t1092: replace 'read-cache --table' with 'ls-files --sparse' Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-12-10 15:13     ` [PATCH v3 4/5] t1091/t3705: remove 'test-tool read-cache --table' Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-12-10 15:13     ` [PATCH v3 5/5] test-read-cache: remove --table, --expand options Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-12-10 16:16     ` [PATCH v3 0/5] Sparse index: fetch, pull, ls-files Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-10 18:45       ` Elijah Newren
2021-12-11  2:24         ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-11  4:45           ` Elijah Newren
2021-12-10 18:53     ` Elijah Newren
2021-12-22 14:20     ` [PATCH v4 " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-12-22 14:20       ` [PATCH v4 1/5] fetch/pull: use the sparse index Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-12-22 14:20       ` [PATCH v4 2/5] ls-files: add --sparse option Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-12-22 14:20       ` [PATCH v4 3/5] t1092: replace 'read-cache --table' with 'ls-files --sparse' Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-12-22 14:20       ` [PATCH v4 4/5] t1091/t3705: remove 'test-tool read-cache --table' Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-12-22 14:20       ` [PATCH v4 5/5] test-read-cache: remove --table, --expand options Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-12-22 19:17       ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Sparse index: fetch, pull, ls-files Elijah Newren
2021-12-22 23:56         ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqfsrtw1s2.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    --cc=stolee@gmail.com \
    --cc=vdye@github.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.