From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.emlix.com (mx1.emlix.com [136.243.223.33]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.1856.1632386056267051097 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 01:34:17 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=pass (domain: emlix.com, ip: 136.243.223.33, mailfrom: dwagenknecht@emlix.com) Received: from mailer.emlix.com (p5098be52.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.152.190.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.emlix.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D845630B9 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 10:34:13 +0200 (CEST) From: "Daniel Wagenknecht" To: docs@lists.yoctoproject.org Subject: [PATCH 0/2] add notes about license implications of bundled initramfs Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 10:34:10 +0200 Message-Id: <20210923083412.1500103-1-dwagenknecht@emlix.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable As discussed on IRC the license implications of using INITRAMFS_IMAGE_BUNDLE are not necessarily obvious. This patchseries adds notes about them in the relevant places. Source of this interpretation of the license implications is the second paragraph of https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/filesystems/ramfs-rootfs-initramfs= .html#external-initramfs-images I placed them where I saw fit, although this leads to multiple `note` blocks in direct succession. If this should be avoided a more thorough rewrite of those sections might be necessary. Daniel Wagenknecht (2): common-tasks: add note about license implications of bundled initramfs ref-manual: add note about license implications of bundled initramfs documentation/dev-manual/common-tasks.rst | 6 ++++++ documentation/ref-manual/variables.rst | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+) --=20 2.25.1