From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9B0C433EF for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 12:36:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com (lelv0143.ext.ti.com [198.47.23.248]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web09.6019.1648557402077289966 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 05:36:42 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17q1 header.b=U3gesSgn; spf=pass (domain: ti.com, ip: 198.47.23.248, mailfrom: reatmon@ti.com) Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 22TCaXjj127581; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 07:36:33 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1648557393; bh=rtFwPYRdA1n/lOyusD3Z24ce7kzoqRRc+hsellVq+Lo=; h=Date:Subject:To:CC:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=U3gesSgnh9AlnJTCuz1WWhOTX50Tu8/lgJxMVsjMhmL/ICHDdohBn3O+U7HjY8HRx +LlrY2guO5HyqRtTOEwBZ9cDYK4k4DhQqfiS/FKvNQnEWF6uY1MS9yzXA1pduBaVTi D26Xmqt7IFKRaPKGjwnxVTDOUumAAjGkklxH39bg= Received: from DLEE112.ent.ti.com (dlee112.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.23]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 22TCaXTn003741 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 29 Mar 2022 07:36:33 -0500 Received: from DLEE103.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.33) by DLEE112.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.14; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 07:36:33 -0500 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DLEE103.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.14 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 07:36:33 -0500 Received: from [128.247.81.69] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 22TCaXQk046439; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 07:36:33 -0500 Message-ID: <76692209-c6ce-2c57-d963-a290a1531496@ti.com> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 07:36:33 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Subject: Re: [meta-arago][master][PATCH 1/2] meta-arago: rename j7-evm to j721e-evm To: Denys Dmytriyenko , CC: Denys Dmytriyenko , Darren Etheridge , References: <20220325184615.17398-1-afd@ti.com> <20220329045112.GR23554@denix.org> From: Ryan Eatmon In-Reply-To: <20220329045112.GR23554@denix.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from li982-79.members.linode.com [45.33.32.79] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 12:36:43 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-arago/message/13761 On 3/28/2022 11:51 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 01:46:14PM -0500, Andrew F. Davis via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: >> In many places we use "j7" the family when we should be using a >> specific SoC or EVM and vice-versa. For instance when including >> graphics drivers we add for all "j7" family, but what we really >> want is only for some specific j7 SoC. >> >> First step in untangling this is to make it clear that there is >> no SoC called j7. There is a SoC called j721e with a j721e-evm. >> >> Fix up this naming here. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis > > Tested-by: Denys Dmytriyenko Applied patch to master. -- Ryan Eatmon Texas Instruments, Inc. reatmon@ti.com -------------------------------------------------------- Analog EDA - Simulation Development - MGTS