From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qk1-f179.google.com (mail-qk1-f179.google.com [209.85.222.179]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web12.1485.1627969775133365652 for ; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 22:49:35 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=nIp3yOGg; spf=pass (domain: gmail.com, ip: 209.85.222.179, mailfrom: raj.khem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk1-f179.google.com with SMTP id 190so18872376qkk.12 for ; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 22:49:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0XuY1GGy7p6Pxk8UP4AT+LUTSREdJKYBRKrkFOyj7R4=; b=nIp3yOGgjdsQU9iQZIDn99RRLCuSrZV9zZBTeX8L0rkpBTYKl/aKEs5UCYPgXlefD5 r3f2YQq45PVfBm/33JHhAJ9ar4Ik4IpWVZbPgcvUYPP6lJLDkaBgIY722gbmhq2/53k2 3Ynx+GcP+qhh/Becne8Lw15qdhmdGYWYXn/pryJe3r99qBRPJg2VUN0ovHuhqvXHaMyf I1/mVIho0PQkb3Le3BOOPy5GNT6QNcLLs0w8A9ljm5QcWsbJLVFXNKzF46GLsT1R7A5Z WW/5M8wjXul+ay23EagyN7OBX4fNzOXn8BY9k4xuW9tLZ1N2MbkW9JP2gZO/GxKn/2np +GzQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0XuY1GGy7p6Pxk8UP4AT+LUTSREdJKYBRKrkFOyj7R4=; b=NkO03F38X8ub1PLZy+xZ4QnJ+In6p75krE6bzbxrFzRJaTfgP15navaB/RT8P9KcXl 6c6eo3t3z2aIa5AWwSKVbbcAcCz1A1wr4aa0WPntmApaTypaLfIKChX7Ur/Ul/yuT9ID FTQAbWbHz4zhp5hqRFipKHKPeM/dDao5YW6h0CURSrv1DKguQHsxxEC/I8MyEa1pfyKm KR/TO+oanOtl3QI3u6CyrU+bje0NA77FbzeQTGLkfy1ecYy0EkrZyLW4ZWduRkpi5lAB Ae6gcEXZnf6586uN7qhVIAaFIl/eJUUXwIfWcUYnaPBkaT5ZywZQ1GzcPrOkGzSKuWRk ix6g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5312MNtD1Fgzle6xXfRclWKQJhvxQteC7Rsoxa0B5ba+RU1RsAAu 2d9EN9Pfu9rmjZYyI/KE4WrQcawjREAVj0pk7z4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyWFFmWmy5Uw9ei4qWpw0mucSOfYCJjnOXuhHuIMnd5DstR3iZlpX1+a8xdkh+7FzR/35VnRoZseTB4QBaq9jA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:31a1:: with SMTP id bi33mr18948282qkb.146.1627969774088; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 22:49:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210802163550.4391-1-raj.khem@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: "Khem Raj" Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 22:49:08 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [meta-arm] [PATCH] meta-arm-toolchain: Convert to new override syntax To: Sumit Garg Cc: meta-arm@lists.yoctoproject.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" yeah ignore this. I have more changes after this On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 10:25 PM Sumit Garg wrote: > > Hi Khem, > > On Mon, 2 Aug 2021 at 22:05, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj > > --- > > meta-arm-toolchain/conf/layer.conf | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/meta-arm-toolchain/conf/layer.conf b/meta-arm-toolchain/conf/layer.conf > > index 04486d4..41305ee 100644 > > --- a/meta-arm-toolchain/conf/layer.conf > > +++ b/meta-arm-toolchain/conf/layer.conf > > @@ -18,4 +18,4 @@ LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_arm-toolchain = "hardknott" > > BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = "true" > > > > # These variables are used for armcompiler license > > -BB_HASHBASE_WHITELIST_append = " ARM_TOOL_VARIANT ARMLMD_LICENSE_FILE LM_LICENSE_FILE" > > +BB_HASHBASE_WHITELIST:append = " ARM_TOOL_VARIANT ARMLMD_LICENSE_FILE LM_LICENSE_FILE" > > This only looks like change for one instance of override and there are > many other instances in meta-arm-toolchain. I think the new override > syntax brings more clarity. So I would suggest converting all other > instances of overrides to new syntax as well. > > -Sumit > > > -- > > 2.32.0 > > > > > > > >