From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B50C433EF for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 06:19:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dent.vctlabs.com (dent.vctlabs.com [207.154.65.135]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web08.34835.1656656363477139272 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 23:19:23 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@vctlabs.com header.s=mail header.b=r0sfRNbA; spf=pass (domain: vctlabs.com, ip: 207.154.65.135, mailfrom: sjl@vctlabs.com) Received: by dent.vctlabs.com (Postfix, from userid 112) id EAB75280203; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 23:19:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=vctlabs.com; s=mail; t=1656656372; bh=t4y7Sin0WBVs2ca7pChVFVAGdIWnlAv92c3p53tWXqU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=r0sfRNbALABMTOAa2fKBuVLxZhsi0jeejT3DlFZggJMCHz9XQA877zIIS9DFdJVAi LbD0vxk7A9k3IhdPqqQTwFc1/OLo51Xu2OCOLO/P7OAuxZJadHznRDUFyJ0KT1X/pj V6zaMsVmf2icHBiCS9QjHUSMSdmhVgfhA3s7KpR0yngAcE9+NcvUhpbg63AMtP1XcG 5SwyL3ctJnCYx4bVEz1xe6gvClZw0VB7o3Cktcp4dbtNFS94h2vnyph+acydusA5mx XfdxQBvFpjshi7lGoGePzPc7cIigCJ5V1W/vACPWR9q4cia13L6usTwx50f+legtZe SR2t6//7b+cWQ== Received: from codepurple (c-71-202-197-248.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [71.202.197.248]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dent.vctlabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA04A2801A9; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 23:19:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=vctlabs.com; s=mail; t=1656656369; bh=t4y7Sin0WBVs2ca7pChVFVAGdIWnlAv92c3p53tWXqU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=apWoiI2+YpIMphm5NPPMNyUAZQO6i3Qah0SBEDvD3ZnBm3Q3NOJXSmmktuskekm87 prW2xM53RxcI5GK3ImbkajDJdDUur1fRflKX9q5o+/ty+dIzR94BGpsyKb7rSgqX65 iRQ81gQ1aZ/C55n/r4SY36vx0bf05cKKygvaNSPS0vepor7Kw378QnGVNVKm0sZdtT Q3W94z17rcQK2czd/BfmT5mnMDN60L/ayivx9T7qUMb4Wz6Yr6fg6TqtghpK2ZXlxN zT01FgJZMnol/F6YT7D3duWuabcjF+KyT0k49FAZ2+JjuO5Lu+OdsZ1nfD1vCNA0hj u/mtn1Owi3xZQ== Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 23:19:18 -0700 From: "S. Lockwood-Childs" To: yogeshbsa89@gmail.com Cc: meta-freescale@lists.yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] Yocto browser require low memory footprints #yocto #meta-freescale Message-ID: <20220701061918.GB1003015@codepurple> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from li982-79.members.linode.com [45.33.32.79] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 06:19:26 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-freescale/message/24853 On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 11:20:13AM -0700, yogeshbsa89@gmail.com wrote: > Hi , > > We are using Yocto Linux 3.0 zeus branch on imx6 based SOC. > we are looking for light weight web browser since our HW platform has only 1 GB of RAM supports. > as of now we are using chromium version 75. but in some use cases we are short falling of RAM. sometimes we have also seen chromium triggers OOM which crashes our main application. > please suggest some light weight browser options or any idea with which we can reduce memory requirement of chromium. > our use case of browser is to only send some predefined screens to one of the browser tab. I've used 'links' browser, which is very light-weight but also very minimal features. If your pre-rendered html is fairly simple, it might work out; probably worth taking a look at how some example pages render in 'links' installed on a Linux desktop. http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/tree/meta-oe/recipes-support/links