Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Bitwise or the conversion colour specifier together

From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: "Nautiyal\, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Bitwise or the conversion colour specifier together
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 13:52:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zh1drr3e.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wnwny3hb.fsf@intel.com>

On Fri, 08 Jan 2021, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Dec 2020, "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> wrote:
>> Thanks Chris to catch this.
>>
>> This definitely should be bitwise Operator, as mentioned by Jani is 
>> right thing to do.
>>
>> The PCON which I had access to, had the F/W which was using 303Ch 
>> (previously proposed) for color conversion capability, instead of what 
>> is latest mentioned in the spec ie. 83h.
>>
>> While testing, I had to skip this line of code, and hardcoded to older 
>> register ie. 303Ch.
>>
>> I Will get this patch tested and update.
>
> In the mean time, the topic/dp-hdmi-2.1-pcon branch has been merged to
> drm-next and backmerged to drm-intel-next. So drm-intel-next is where
> the fixes should now land.

Ankit, where are we with this? I'm anxious to merge this.

BR,
Jani.

>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
>>
>>
>> Thanks & Regards,
>>
>> Ankit
>>
>>
>> On 12/23/2020 4:21 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2020, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c:6922 intel_dp_update_420() warn: should this be a bitwise op?
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c:6922 intel_dp_update_420() warn: should this be a bitwise op?
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c:6923 intel_dp_update_420() warn: should this be a bitwise op?
>>>>
>>>> Inside drm_dp_downstream_rgb_to_ycbcr_conversion(), that paramter
>>>> 'color_spc' is used as return port_cap[3] & color_spc, implying that it
>>>> is indeed a mask and not a boolean value.
>>> So this one belongs in topic/dp-hdmi-2.1-pcon branch.
>>>
>>> Purely based on the context this is the right thing to do, so:
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>>
>>> Ankit, please test the patch in case it uncovers some other
>>> issues. It'll impact the RGB to YCbCr conversion.
>>>
>>> BR,
>>> Jani.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Fixes: 522508b665df ("drm/i915/display: Let PCON convert from RGB to YCbCr if it can")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>>>> Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 4 ++--
>>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>>> index 8b4b2ea52859..157a850a83a7 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>>> @@ -6918,8 +6918,8 @@ intel_dp_update_420(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>>>   							intel_dp->downstream_ports);
>>>>   	rgb_to_ycbcr = drm_dp_downstream_rgb_to_ycbcr_conversion(intel_dp->dpcd,
>>>>   								 intel_dp->downstream_ports,
>>>> -								 DP_DS_HDMI_BT601_RGB_YCBCR_CONV ||
>>>> -								 DP_DS_HDMI_BT709_RGB_YCBCR_CONV ||
>>>> +								 DP_DS_HDMI_BT601_RGB_YCBCR_CONV |
>>>> +								 DP_DS_HDMI_BT709_RGB_YCBCR_CONV |
>>>>   								 DP_DS_HDMI_BT2020_RGB_YCBCR_CONV);
>>>>   
>>>>   	if (INTEL_GEN(i915) >= 11) {
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx