* Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
[not found] <008701cecc19$14734370$3d59ca50$@ntlworld.com>
@ 2013-10-28 6:13 ` Andreas Dilger
2013-10-28 6:39 ` Zheng Liu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Dilger @ 2013-10-28 6:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Elliott, David Jeffery
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List, Bernd Schubert
The error reported here is a relatively new one. It only appeared in
e2fsck 1.42.8, and wasn’t in the code that I’m using locally (1.42.7)
so I wasn’t sure what it actually meant without looking at it.
It looks like some kind of overflow of the extent tree, which causes
e2fsck to chop off the last 5 disk blocks (40 sectors), though I’m not
sure exactly why. From your comments, this can be reproduced with
your database usage? Does it use fallocate() or any other strange
IO operations that might be causing this?
Have you tried updating your kernel? If there is repeated corruption
appearing in the filesystem, then it is either a bug in the kernel or
in e2fsck. Not really sure which one to blame at this point.
Cheers, Andreas
On Oct 18, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Stephen Elliott <techweb@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> Any feedback on this guys??? Would really appreciate somebody taking a look over this.
>
> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
> Sent: 22 September 2013 20:13
> To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Andreas Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
> Subject: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have theorised that the problem comes from the MS access DB being open (over Samba) on client workstations when the server is reloaded.
>
> Since ensuring these are closed prior to reloading, I have not seen further FSCK errors on reload. Is there an explanation for this? I can see why this may corrupt DB but not the filesystem.
>
> Just as a primer, I used a ReadyNAS NV+ for many years which was running ext3 and never had this issue. However, since using ext4 on a ReadyNAS Pro, I now see this issue.
>
> Many Thanks
> Stephen Elliott
>
> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
> Sent: 23 July 2013 22:02
> To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Andreas Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
> Subject: RE: FSCK Errors on ext4
>
> If it helps guys, the same file as before is causing the issue with inode 4195610, a very large MS access DB.
>
> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
> Sent: 23 July 2013 21:52
> To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Andreas Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
> Subject: FSCK Errors on ext4
>
> Hi Andreas / Bernd / all,
>
> You may recall advising me on another batch of FSCK errors a few months back.
>
> The same device on an ext4 file system has produced the following errors after a clean reload. It seems to be fine now but wanted your input on this. No bad blocks are reported on the devices etc.
>
> ***** File system check forced at Tue Jul 23 21:02:13 WEST 2013 ***** fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) e2fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, end of extent exceeds allowed value
> (logical block 64907, physical block 11435403, len 16) Clear? yes
>
> Inode 4195619, i_blocks is 1337216, should be 1337176. Fix? yes
>
> Pass 2: Checking directory structure
> Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
> Pass 4: Checking reference counts
> Pass 5: Checking group summary information Block bitmap differences: -(11435403--11435407) Fix? yes
>
> Free blocks count wrong for group #348 (2130, counted=2135).
> Fix? yes
>
> Free blocks count wrong (417470107, counted=417470112).
> Fix? yes
>
>
> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
> /dev/c/c: 625785/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous), 65923424/483393536 blocks
>
> Many Thanks
> Stephen Elliott
Cheers, Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
2013-10-28 6:13 ` Query FSCK Errors on ext4 Andreas Dilger
@ 2013-10-28 6:39 ` Zheng Liu
2013-10-28 9:00 ` Stephen Elliott
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Zheng Liu @ 2013-10-28 6:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Dilger
Cc: Stephen Elliott, David Jeffery, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List,
Bernd Schubert, Eric Whitney
[Cc Eric Whitney to confirm this problem]
Hi Andreas,
If I remember correctly, this patch might can fix this problem [1].
1. http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg39485.html
Regards,
- Zheng
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:13:26AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> The error reported here is a relatively new one. It only appeared in
> e2fsck 1.42.8, and wasn’t in the code that I’m using locally (1.42.7)
> so I wasn’t sure what it actually meant without looking at it.
>
> It looks like some kind of overflow of the extent tree, which causes
> e2fsck to chop off the last 5 disk blocks (40 sectors), though I’m not
> sure exactly why. From your comments, this can be reproduced with
> your database usage? Does it use fallocate() or any other strange
> IO operations that might be causing this?
>
> Have you tried updating your kernel? If there is repeated corruption
> appearing in the filesystem, then it is either a bug in the kernel or
> in e2fsck. Not really sure which one to blame at this point.
>
> Cheers, Andreas
>
> On Oct 18, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Stephen Elliott <techweb@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
> > Any feedback on this guys??? Would really appreciate somebody taking a look over this.
> >
> > From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
> > Sent: 22 September 2013 20:13
> > To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Andreas Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
> > Subject: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have theorised that the problem comes from the MS access DB being open (over Samba) on client workstations when the server is reloaded.
> >
> > Since ensuring these are closed prior to reloading, I have not seen further FSCK errors on reload. Is there an explanation for this? I can see why this may corrupt DB but not the filesystem.
> >
> > Just as a primer, I used a ReadyNAS NV+ for many years which was running ext3 and never had this issue. However, since using ext4 on a ReadyNAS Pro, I now see this issue.
> >
> > Many Thanks
> > Stephen Elliott
> >
> > From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
> > Sent: 23 July 2013 22:02
> > To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Andreas Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
> > Subject: RE: FSCK Errors on ext4
> >
> > If it helps guys, the same file as before is causing the issue with inode 4195610, a very large MS access DB.
> >
> > From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
> > Sent: 23 July 2013 21:52
> > To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Andreas Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
> > Subject: FSCK Errors on ext4
> >
> > Hi Andreas / Bernd / all,
> >
> > You may recall advising me on another batch of FSCK errors a few months back.
> >
> > The same device on an ext4 file system has produced the following errors after a clean reload. It seems to be fine now but wanted your input on this. No bad blocks are reported on the devices etc.
> >
> > ***** File system check forced at Tue Jul 23 21:02:13 WEST 2013 ***** fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) e2fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, end of extent exceeds allowed value
> > (logical block 64907, physical block 11435403, len 16) Clear? yes
> >
> > Inode 4195619, i_blocks is 1337216, should be 1337176. Fix? yes
> >
> > Pass 2: Checking directory structure
> > Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
> > Pass 4: Checking reference counts
> > Pass 5: Checking group summary information Block bitmap differences: -(11435403--11435407) Fix? yes
> >
> > Free blocks count wrong for group #348 (2130, counted=2135).
> > Fix? yes
> >
> > Free blocks count wrong (417470107, counted=417470112).
> > Fix? yes
> >
> >
> > /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
> > /dev/c/c: 625785/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous), 65923424/483393536 blocks
> >
> > Many Thanks
> > Stephen Elliott
>
>
> Cheers, Andreas
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* RE: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
2013-10-28 6:39 ` Zheng Liu
@ 2013-10-28 9:00 ` Stephen Elliott
2013-10-28 20:53 ` Andreas Dilger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Elliott @ 2013-10-28 9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Zheng Liu', 'Andreas Dilger'
Cc: 'David Jeffery', linux-ext4, 'Bernd Schubert',
'Eric Whitney'
Thanks for the reply guys...
The device in question is a ReadyNAS Pro 6, which happens to be running Linux :) I actually saw some issues with e2fsck 1.42.3 earlier this year:
***** File system check forced at Fri Apr 26 20:08:38 WEST 2013 ***** fsck 1.41.14 (22-Dec-2010) e2fsck 1.42.3 (14-May-2012) Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, i_blocks is 3135728, should be 3135904. Fix? yes
Running additional passes to resolve blocks claimed by more than one inode...
Pass 1B: Rescanning for multiply-claimed blocks Multiply-claimed block(s) in inode 4195619: 167904376 167904377 167904378 167904379 167904380 167904381 167904382 167904383 167904384 167904385 167904386 167949296 167949297 167949298 167949299 167949300 167949301 167949302 167949303 167949304 167949305 167949306 Pass 1C: Scanning directories for inodes with multiply-claimed blocks Pass 1D: Reconciling multiply-claimed blocks (There are 1 inodes containing multiply-claimed blocks.)
File /PREMIER/Premier Automation Purchase OrdersApp V18.5.mdb (inode #4195619, mod time Fri Apr 26 20:07:42 2013)
has 22 multiply-claimed block(s), shared with 0 file(s):
Multiply-claimed blocks already reassigned or cloned.
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
/dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
/dev/c/c: 615898/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous), 62353456/483393536 blocks
After deleting the file (MS Access DB, and re-creating from backup, the file system got mounted read only and the following errors were logged:]
May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904376:freeing already freed block (bit 1144
May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: Aborting journal on device dm-0-8.
May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs (dm-0: Remounting filesystem read-only
May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904377:freeing already freed block (bit 1145
May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904378:freeing already freed block (bit 1146
May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904379:freeing already freed block (bit 1147
May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904380:freeing already freed block (bit 1148
May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904381:freeing already freed block (bit 1149
May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904382:freeing already freed block (bit 1150
May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904383:freeing already freed block (bit 1151
May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904384:freeing already freed block (bit 1152
May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904385:freeing already freed block (bit 1153
May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904386:freeing already freed block (bit 1154
May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949296:freeing already freed block (bit 13296
May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949297:freeing already freed block (bit 13297
May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949298:freeing already freed block (bit 13298
May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949299:freeing already freed block (bit 13299
May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949300:freeing already freed block (bit 13300
May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949301:freeing already freed block (bit 13301
May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949302:freeing already freed block (bit 13302
May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949303:freeing already freed block (bit 13303
May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949304:freeing already freed block (bit 13304
May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949305:freeing already freed block (bit 13305
May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949306:freeing already freed block (bit 13306
These are the same blocks slated as multiply claimed
And then running an FSCK, we got the following:
***** File system check forced at Wed May 8 15:16:50 WEST 2013 ***** fsck 1.41.14 (22-Dec-2010 e2fsck 1.42.3 (14-May-2012
/dev/c/c: recovering journal
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Pass 2: Checking directory structure Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information Free blocks count wrong for group #5124 (28170, counted=28159.
Fix? yes
Free blocks count wrong for group #5125 (25861, counted=25850.
Fix? yes
Free blocks count wrong (420683133, counted=420644972.
Fix? yes
Free inodes count wrong (29595347, counted=29595271.
Fix? yes
/dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
/dev/c/c: 616825/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous, 62748564/483393536 blocks
Then later in the year I reloaded the server with the database open from several client machines
***** File system check forced at Tue Jul 23 21:02:13 WEST 2013 ***** fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) e2fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, end of extent exceeds allowed value
(logical block 64907, physical block 11435403, len 16) Clear? yes
Inode 4195619, i_blocks is 1337216, should be 1337176. Fix? yes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information Block bitmap differences: -(11435403--11435407) Fix? yes
Free blocks count wrong for group #348 (2130, counted=2135).
Fix? yes
Free blocks count wrong (417470107, counted=417470112).
Fix? yes
/dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
/dev/c/c: 625785/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous), 65923424/483393536 blocks
Again related to the same file, which is only an MS Access DB open from several client machines over SMB when the server is rebooted. Moving forward I ensure all instances are closed when reloading but even so I am surprised that a clean reload causes corruption at the filesystem level.
Since ensuring the DB is closed before reload, I have seen no further issues like this.
Many Thanks
Stephen Elliott
-----Original Message-----
From: Zheng Liu [mailto:gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 October 2013 06:39
To: Andreas Dilger
Cc: Stephen Elliott; David Jeffery; linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List; Bernd Schubert; Eric Whitney
Subject: Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
[Cc Eric Whitney to confirm this problem]
Hi Andreas,
If I remember correctly, this patch might can fix this problem [1].
1. http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg39485.html
Regards,
- Zheng
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:13:26AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> The error reported here is a relatively new one. It only appeared in
> e2fsck 1.42.8, and wasn t in the code that I m using locally (1.42.7)
> so I wasn t sure what it actually meant without looking at it.
>
> It looks like some kind of overflow of the extent tree, which causes
> e2fsck to chop off the last 5 disk blocks (40 sectors), though I m not
> sure exactly why. From your comments, this can be reproduced with
> your database usage? Does it use fallocate() or any other strange IO
> operations that might be causing this?
>
> Have you tried updating your kernel? If there is repeated corruption
> appearing in the filesystem, then it is either a bug in the kernel or
> in e2fsck. Not really sure which one to blame at this point.
>
> Cheers, Andreas
>
> On Oct 18, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Stephen Elliott <techweb@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
> > Any feedback on this guys??? Would really appreciate somebody taking a look over this.
> >
> > From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
> > Sent: 22 September 2013 20:13
> > To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Andreas Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
> > Subject: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have theorised that the problem comes from the MS access DB being open (over Samba) on client workstations when the server is reloaded.
> >
> > Since ensuring these are closed prior to reloading, I have not seen further FSCK errors on reload. Is there an explanation for this? I can see why this may corrupt DB but not the filesystem.
> >
> > Just as a primer, I used a ReadyNAS NV+ for many years which was running ext3 and never had this issue. However, since using ext4 on a ReadyNAS Pro, I now see this issue.
> >
> > Many Thanks
> > Stephen Elliott
> >
> > From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
> > Sent: 23 July 2013 22:02
> > To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Andreas Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
> > Subject: RE: FSCK Errors on ext4
> >
> > If it helps guys, the same file as before is causing the issue with inode 4195610, a very large MS access DB.
> >
> > From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
> > Sent: 23 July 2013 21:52
> > To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Andreas Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
> > Subject: FSCK Errors on ext4
> >
> > Hi Andreas / Bernd / all,
> >
> > You may recall advising me on another batch of FSCK errors a few months back.
> >
> > The same device on an ext4 file system has produced the following errors after a clean reload. It seems to be fine now but wanted your input on this. No bad blocks are reported on the devices etc.
> >
> > ***** File system check forced at Tue Jul 23 21:02:13 WEST 2013 ***** fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) e2fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, end of extent exceeds allowed value
> > (logical block 64907, physical block 11435403, len
> > 16) Clear? yes
> >
> > Inode 4195619, i_blocks is 1337216, should be 1337176. Fix? yes
> >
> > Pass 2: Checking directory structure Pass 3: Checking directory
> > connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference counts Pass 5: Checking
> > group summary information Block bitmap differences:
> > -(11435403--11435407) Fix? yes
> >
> > Free blocks count wrong for group #348 (2130, counted=2135).
> > Fix? yes
> >
> > Free blocks count wrong (417470107, counted=417470112).
> > Fix? yes
> >
> >
> > /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
> > /dev/c/c: 625785/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous),
> > 65923424/483393536 blocks
> >
> > Many Thanks
> > Stephen Elliott
>
>
> Cheers, Andreas
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4"
> in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo
> info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
2013-10-28 9:00 ` Stephen Elliott
@ 2013-10-28 20:53 ` Andreas Dilger
2013-10-28 21:18 ` Stephen Elliott
2013-11-19 12:44 ` Stephen Elliott
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Dilger @ 2013-10-28 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Elliott
Cc: Zheng Liu, David Jeffery, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List,
Bernd Schubert, Eric Whitney
On Oct 28, 2013, at 3:00 AM, Stephen Elliott <techweb@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the reply guys...
>
> The device in question is a ReadyNAS Pro 6, which happens to be running Linux :) I actually saw some issues with e2fsck 1.42.3 earlier this year:
So it looks like your next course of action is to contact ReadyNAS to see
if they have the patch that Zheng mentioned below in their kernel.
Cheers, Andreas
> ***** File system check forced at Fri Apr 26 20:08:38 WEST 2013 ***** fsck 1.41.14 (22-Dec-2010) e2fsck 1.42.3 (14-May-2012) Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, i_blocks is 3135728, should be 3135904. Fix? yes
>
> Running additional passes to resolve blocks claimed by more than one inode...
> Pass 1B: Rescanning for multiply-claimed blocks Multiply-claimed block(s) in inode 4195619: 167904376 167904377 167904378 167904379 167904380 167904381 167904382 167904383 167904384 167904385 167904386 167949296 167949297 167949298 167949299 167949300 167949301 167949302 167949303 167949304 167949305 167949306 Pass 1C: Scanning directories for inodes with multiply-claimed blocks Pass 1D: Reconciling multiply-claimed blocks (There are 1 inodes containing multiply-claimed blocks.)
>
> File /PREMIER/Premier Automation Purchase OrdersApp V18.5.mdb (inode #4195619, mod time Fri Apr 26 20:07:42 2013)
> has 22 multiply-claimed block(s), shared with 0 file(s):
> Multiply-claimed blocks already reassigned or cloned.
>
> Pass 2: Checking directory structure
> Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
> Pass 4: Checking reference counts
> Pass 5: Checking group summary information
>
> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
> /dev/c/c: 615898/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous), 62353456/483393536 blocks
>
> After deleting the file (MS Access DB, and re-creating from backup, the file system got mounted read only and the following errors were logged:]
>
> May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904376:freeing already freed block (bit 1144
> May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: Aborting journal on device dm-0-8.
> May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs (dm-0: Remounting filesystem read-only
> May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904377:freeing already freed block (bit 1145
> May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904378:freeing already freed block (bit 1146
> May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904379:freeing already freed block (bit 1147
> May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904380:freeing already freed block (bit 1148
> May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904381:freeing already freed block (bit 1149
> May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904382:freeing already freed block (bit 1150
> May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904383:freeing already freed block (bit 1151
> May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904384:freeing already freed block (bit 1152
> May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904385:freeing already freed block (bit 1153
> May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904386:freeing already freed block (bit 1154
> May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949296:freeing already freed block (bit 13296
> May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949297:freeing already freed block (bit 13297
> May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949298:freeing already freed block (bit 13298
> May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949299:freeing already freed block (bit 13299
> May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949300:freeing already freed block (bit 13300
> May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949301:freeing already freed block (bit 13301
> May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949302:freeing already freed block (bit 13302
> May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949303:freeing already freed block (bit 13303
> May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949304:freeing already freed block (bit 13304
> May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949305:freeing already freed block (bit 13305
> May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949306:freeing already freed block (bit 13306
>
>
> These are the same blocks slated as multiply claimed
>
> And then running an FSCK, we got the following:
>
> ***** File system check forced at Wed May 8 15:16:50 WEST 2013 ***** fsck 1.41.14 (22-Dec-2010 e2fsck 1.42.3 (14-May-2012
> /dev/c/c: recovering journal
> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Pass 2: Checking directory structure Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information Free blocks count wrong for group #5124 (28170, counted=28159.
> Fix? yes
>
> Free blocks count wrong for group #5125 (25861, counted=25850.
> Fix? yes
>
> Free blocks count wrong (420683133, counted=420644972.
> Fix? yes
>
> Free inodes count wrong (29595347, counted=29595271.
> Fix? yes
>
>
> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
> /dev/c/c: 616825/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous, 62748564/483393536 blocks
>
> Then later in the year I reloaded the server with the database open from several client machines
>
> ***** File system check forced at Tue Jul 23 21:02:13 WEST 2013 ***** fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) e2fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, end of extent exceeds allowed value
> (logical block 64907, physical block 11435403, len 16) Clear? yes
>
> Inode 4195619, i_blocks is 1337216, should be 1337176. Fix? yes
>
> Pass 2: Checking directory structure
> Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
> Pass 4: Checking reference counts
> Pass 5: Checking group summary information Block bitmap differences: -(11435403--11435407) Fix? yes
>
> Free blocks count wrong for group #348 (2130, counted=2135).
> Fix? yes
>
> Free blocks count wrong (417470107, counted=417470112).
> Fix? yes
>
>
> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
> /dev/c/c: 625785/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous), 65923424/483393536 blocks
>
> Again related to the same file, which is only an MS Access DB open from several client machines over SMB when the server is rebooted. Moving forward I ensure all instances are closed when reloading but even so I am surprised that a clean reload causes corruption at the filesystem level.
>
> Since ensuring the DB is closed before reload, I have seen no further issues like this.
>
> Many Thanks
> Stephen Elliott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zheng Liu [mailto:gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com]
> Sent: 28 October 2013 06:39
> To: Andreas Dilger
> Cc: Stephen Elliott; David Jeffery; linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List; Bernd Schubert; Eric Whitney
> Subject: Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
>
> [Cc Eric Whitney to confirm this problem]
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> If I remember correctly, this patch might can fix this problem [1].
>
> 1. http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg39485.html
>
> Regards,
> - Zheng
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:13:26AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>> The error reported here is a relatively new one. It only appeared in
>> e2fsck 1.42.8, and wasn t in the code that I m using locally (1.42.7)
>> so I wasn t sure what it actually meant without looking at it.
>>
>> It looks like some kind of overflow of the extent tree, which causes
>> e2fsck to chop off the last 5 disk blocks (40 sectors), though I m not
>> sure exactly why. From your comments, this can be reproduced with
>> your database usage? Does it use fallocate() or any other strange IO
>> operations that might be causing this?
>>
>> Have you tried updating your kernel? If there is repeated corruption
>> appearing in the filesystem, then it is either a bug in the kernel or
>> in e2fsck. Not really sure which one to blame at this point.
>>
>> Cheers, Andreas
>>
>> On Oct 18, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Stephen Elliott <techweb@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Any feedback on this guys??? Would really appreciate somebody taking a look over this.
>>>
>>> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
>>> Sent: 22 September 2013 20:13
>>> To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Andreas Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
>>> Subject: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have theorised that the problem comes from the MS access DB being open (over Samba) on client workstations when the server is reloaded.
>>>
>>> Since ensuring these are closed prior to reloading, I have not seen further FSCK errors on reload. Is there an explanation for this? I can see why this may corrupt DB but not the filesystem.
>>>
>>> Just as a primer, I used a ReadyNAS NV+ for many years which was running ext3 and never had this issue. However, since using ext4 on a ReadyNAS Pro, I now see this issue.
>>>
>>> Many Thanks
>>> Stephen Elliott
>>>
>>> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
>>> Sent: 23 July 2013 22:02
>>> To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Andreas Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
>>> Subject: RE: FSCK Errors on ext4
>>>
>>> If it helps guys, the same file as before is causing the issue with inode 4195610, a very large MS access DB.
>>>
>>> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
>>> Sent: 23 July 2013 21:52
>>> To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Andreas Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
>>> Subject: FSCK Errors on ext4
>>>
>>> Hi Andreas / Bernd / all,
>>>
>>> You may recall advising me on another batch of FSCK errors a few months back.
>>>
>>> The same device on an ext4 file system has produced the following errors after a clean reload. It seems to be fine now but wanted your input on this. No bad blocks are reported on the devices etc.
>>>
>>> ***** File system check forced at Tue Jul 23 21:02:13 WEST 2013 ***** fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) e2fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, end of extent exceeds allowed value
>>> (logical block 64907, physical block 11435403, len
>>> 16) Clear? yes
>>>
>>> Inode 4195619, i_blocks is 1337216, should be 1337176. Fix? yes
>>>
>>> Pass 2: Checking directory structure Pass 3: Checking directory
>>> connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference counts Pass 5: Checking
>>> group summary information Block bitmap differences:
>>> -(11435403--11435407) Fix? yes
>>>
>>> Free blocks count wrong for group #348 (2130, counted=2135).
>>> Fix? yes
>>>
>>> Free blocks count wrong (417470107, counted=417470112).
>>> Fix? yes
>>>
>>>
>>> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
>>> /dev/c/c: 625785/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous),
>>> 65923424/483393536 blocks
>>>
>>> Many Thanks
>>> Stephen Elliott
>>
>>
>> Cheers, Andreas
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4"
>> in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo
>> info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
Cheers, Andreas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* RE: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
2013-10-28 20:53 ` Andreas Dilger
@ 2013-10-28 21:18 ` Stephen Elliott
2013-11-19 12:44 ` Stephen Elliott
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Elliott @ 2013-10-28 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Andreas Dilger'
Cc: 'Zheng Liu', 'David Jeffery',
linux-ext4, 'Bernd Schubert', 'Eric Whitney'
Ultimately I am not too worried about this problem (now I know the cause)
but I am intrigued to know what actually caused the issue in the first
place. As you can see there is some history around the problem.
Also was that defect / bug actually confirmed?
-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas Dilger [mailto:adilger@dilger.ca]
Sent: 28 October 2013 20:54
To: Stephen Elliott
Cc: Zheng Liu; David Jeffery; linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List; Bernd
Schubert; Eric Whitney
Subject: Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
On Oct 28, 2013, at 3:00 AM, Stephen Elliott <techweb@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the reply guys...
>
> The device in question is a ReadyNAS Pro 6, which happens to be running
Linux :) I actually saw some issues with e2fsck 1.42.3 earlier this year:
So it looks like your next course of action is to contact ReadyNAS to see if
they have the patch that Zheng mentioned below in their kernel.
Cheers, Andreas
> ***** File system check forced at Fri Apr 26 20:08:38 WEST 2013 *****
> fsck 1.41.14 (22-Dec-2010) e2fsck 1.42.3 (14-May-2012) Pass 1:
> Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, i_blocks is 3135728,
> should be 3135904. Fix? yes
>
> Running additional passes to resolve blocks claimed by more than one
inode...
> Pass 1B: Rescanning for multiply-claimed blocks Multiply-claimed
> block(s) in inode 4195619: 167904376 167904377 167904378 167904379
> 167904380 167904381 167904382 167904383 167904384 167904385 167904386
> 167949296 167949297 167949298 167949299 167949300 167949301 167949302
> 167949303 167949304 167949305 167949306 Pass 1C: Scanning directories
> for inodes with multiply-claimed blocks Pass 1D: Reconciling
> multiply-claimed blocks (There are 1 inodes containing
> multiply-claimed blocks.)
>
> File /PREMIER/Premier Automation Purchase OrdersApp V18.5.mdb (inode
> #4195619, mod time Fri Apr 26 20:07:42 2013) has 22 multiply-claimed
block(s), shared with 0 file(s):
> Multiply-claimed blocks already reassigned or cloned.
>
> Pass 2: Checking directory structure
> Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference
> counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information
>
> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
> /dev/c/c: 615898/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous),
> 62353456/483393536 blocks
>
> After deleting the file (MS Access DB, and re-creating from backup,
> the file system got mounted read only and the following errors were
> logged:]
>
> May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904376:freeing already freed block
(bit 1144 May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: Aborting journal on device dm-0-8.
> May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs (dm-0: Remounting filesystem
> read-only May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904377:freeing already freed
> block (bit 1145 May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device
> dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904378:freeing already
> freed block (bit 1146 May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error
> (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904379:freeing
> already freed block (bit 1147 May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs
> error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block
> 167904380:freeing already freed block (bit 1148 May 8 14:58:15 despair
> kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group
> 5124block 167904381:freeing already freed block (bit 1149 May 8
> 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904382:freeing already freed
> block (bit 1150 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device
> dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904383:freeing already
> freed block (bit 1151 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error
> (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904384:freeing
> already freed block (bit 1152 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs
> error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block
> 167904385:freeing already freed block (bit 1153 May 8 14:58:16 despair
> kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group
> 5124block 167904386:freeing already freed block (bit 1154 May 8
> 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949296:freeing already freed
> block (bit 13296 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device
> dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949297:freeing already
> freed block (bit 13297 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error
> (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949298:freeing
> already freed block (bit 13298 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs
> error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block
> 167949299:freeing already freed block (bit 13299 May 8 14:58:17
> despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group
> 5125block 167949300:freeing already freed block (bit 13300 May 8
> 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949301:freeing already freed
> block (bit 13301 May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device
> dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949302:freeing already
> freed block (bit 13302 May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error
> (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949303:freeing
> already freed block (bit 13303 May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs
> error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block
> 167949304:freeing already freed block (bit 13304 May 8 14:58:17
> despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group
> 5125block 167949305:freeing already freed block (bit 13305 May 8
> 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949306:freeing already freed
> block (bit 13306
>
>
> These are the same blocks slated as multiply claimed
>
> And then running an FSCK, we got the following:
>
> ***** File system check forced at Wed May 8 15:16:50 WEST 2013 *****
> fsck 1.41.14 (22-Dec-2010 e2fsck 1.42.3 (14-May-2012
> /dev/c/c: recovering journal
> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Pass 2: Checking directory
structure Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference
counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information Free blocks count wrong
for group #5124 (28170, counted=28159.
> Fix? yes
>
> Free blocks count wrong for group #5125 (25861, counted=25850.
> Fix? yes
>
> Free blocks count wrong (420683133, counted=420644972.
> Fix? yes
>
> Free inodes count wrong (29595347, counted=29595271.
> Fix? yes
>
>
> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
> /dev/c/c: 616825/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous,
> 62748564/483393536 blocks
>
> Then later in the year I reloaded the server with the database open
> from several client machines
>
> ***** File system check forced at Tue Jul 23 21:02:13 WEST 2013 ***** fsck
1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) e2fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) Pass 1: Checking inodes,
blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, end of extent exceeds allowed value
> (logical block 64907, physical block 11435403, len 16)
> Clear? yes
>
> Inode 4195619, i_blocks is 1337216, should be 1337176. Fix? yes
>
> Pass 2: Checking directory structure
> Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference
> counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information Block bitmap
> differences: -(11435403--11435407) Fix? yes
>
> Free blocks count wrong for group #348 (2130, counted=2135).
> Fix? yes
>
> Free blocks count wrong (417470107, counted=417470112).
> Fix? yes
>
>
> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
> /dev/c/c: 625785/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous),
> 65923424/483393536 blocks
>
> Again related to the same file, which is only an MS Access DB open from
several client machines over SMB when the server is rebooted. Moving forward
I ensure all instances are closed when reloading but even so I am surprised
that a clean reload causes corruption at the filesystem level.
>
> Since ensuring the DB is closed before reload, I have seen no further
issues like this.
>
> Many Thanks
> Stephen Elliott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zheng Liu [mailto:gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com]
> Sent: 28 October 2013 06:39
> To: Andreas Dilger
> Cc: Stephen Elliott; David Jeffery; linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List;
> Bernd Schubert; Eric Whitney
> Subject: Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
>
> [Cc Eric Whitney to confirm this problem]
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> If I remember correctly, this patch might can fix this problem [1].
>
> 1. http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg39485.html
>
> Regards,
> - Zheng
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:13:26AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>> The error reported here is a relatively new one. It only appeared in
>> e2fsck 1.42.8, and wasn t in the code that I m using locally (1.42.7)
>> so I wasn t sure what it actually meant without looking at it.
>>
>> It looks like some kind of overflow of the extent tree, which causes
>> e2fsck to chop off the last 5 disk blocks (40 sectors), though I m
>> not sure exactly why. From your comments, this can be reproduced
>> with your database usage? Does it use fallocate() or any other
>> strange IO operations that might be causing this?
>>
>> Have you tried updating your kernel? If there is repeated corruption
>> appearing in the filesystem, then it is either a bug in the kernel or
>> in e2fsck. Not really sure which one to blame at this point.
>>
>> Cheers, Andreas
>>
>> On Oct 18, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Stephen Elliott <techweb@ntlworld.com>
wrote:
>>
>>> Any feedback on this guys??? Would really appreciate somebody taking a
look over this.
>>>
>>> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
>>> Sent: 22 September 2013 20:13
>>> To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Andreas
Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
>>> Subject: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have theorised that the problem comes from the MS access DB being open
(over Samba) on client workstations when the server is reloaded.
>>>
>>> Since ensuring these are closed prior to reloading, I have not seen
further FSCK errors on reload. Is there an explanation for this? I can see
why this may corrupt DB but not the filesystem.
>>>
>>> Just as a primer, I used a ReadyNAS NV+ for many years which was running
ext3 and never had this issue. However, since using ext4 on a ReadyNAS Pro,
I now see this issue.
>>>
>>> Many Thanks
>>> Stephen Elliott
>>>
>>> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
>>> Sent: 23 July 2013 22:02
>>> To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Andreas
Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
>>> Subject: RE: FSCK Errors on ext4
>>>
>>> If it helps guys, the same file as before is causing the issue with
inode 4195610, a very large MS access DB.
>>>
>>> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
>>> Sent: 23 July 2013 21:52
>>> To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Andreas
Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
>>> Subject: FSCK Errors on ext4
>>>
>>> Hi Andreas / Bernd / all,
>>>
>>> You may recall advising me on another batch of FSCK errors a few months
back.
>>>
>>> The same device on an ext4 file system has produced the following errors
after a clean reload. It seems to be fine now but wanted your input on this.
No bad blocks are reported on the devices etc.
>>>
>>> ***** File system check forced at Tue Jul 23 21:02:13 WEST 2013 *****
fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) e2fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) Pass 1: Checking
inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, end of extent exceeds allowed value
>>> (logical block 64907, physical block 11435403, len
>>> 16) Clear? yes
>>>
>>> Inode 4195619, i_blocks is 1337216, should be 1337176. Fix? yes
>>>
>>> Pass 2: Checking directory structure Pass 3: Checking directory
>>> connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference counts Pass 5: Checking
>>> group summary information Block bitmap differences:
>>> -(11435403--11435407) Fix? yes
>>>
>>> Free blocks count wrong for group #348 (2130, counted=2135).
>>> Fix? yes
>>>
>>> Free blocks count wrong (417470107, counted=417470112).
>>> Fix? yes
>>>
>>>
>>> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
>>> /dev/c/c: 625785/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous),
>>> 65923424/483393536 blocks
>>>
>>> Many Thanks
>>> Stephen Elliott
>>
>>
>> Cheers, Andreas
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4"
>> in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo
>> info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
Cheers, Andreas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* RE: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
2013-10-28 20:53 ` Andreas Dilger
2013-10-28 21:18 ` Stephen Elliott
@ 2013-11-19 12:44 ` Stephen Elliott
2013-11-19 16:46 ` Andreas Dilger
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Elliott @ 2013-11-19 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Andreas Dilger'
Cc: 'Zheng Liu', 'David Jeffery',
linux-ext4, 'Bernd Schubert', 'Eric Whitney'
Hi Guys,
Did you have any further feedback on this? It is purely curiosity for me:
I have theorised that the problem comes from the MS access DB being open
(over Samba) on client workstations when the server is reloaded.
Since ensuring these are closed prior to reloading, I have not seen further
FSCK errors on reload. Is there an explanation for this? I can see why this
may corrupt DB but not the filesystem.
Many Thanks
Stephen Elliott
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
Sent: 28 October 2013 21:18
To: 'Andreas Dilger'
Cc: 'Zheng Liu'; 'David Jeffery'; 'linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List'; 'Bernd
Schubert'; 'Eric Whitney'
Subject: RE: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
Ultimately I am not too worried about this problem (now I know the cause)
but I am intrigued to know what actually caused the issue in the first
place. As you can see there is some history around the problem.
Also was that defect / bug actually confirmed?
-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas Dilger [mailto:adilger@dilger.ca]
Sent: 28 October 2013 20:54
To: Stephen Elliott
Cc: Zheng Liu; David Jeffery; linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List; Bernd
Schubert; Eric Whitney
Subject: Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
On Oct 28, 2013, at 3:00 AM, Stephen Elliott <techweb@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the reply guys...
>
> The device in question is a ReadyNAS Pro 6, which happens to be running
Linux :) I actually saw some issues with e2fsck 1.42.3 earlier this year:
So it looks like your next course of action is to contact ReadyNAS to see if
they have the patch that Zheng mentioned below in their kernel.
Cheers, Andreas
> ***** File system check forced at Fri Apr 26 20:08:38 WEST 2013 *****
> fsck 1.41.14 (22-Dec-2010) e2fsck 1.42.3 (14-May-2012) Pass 1:
> Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, i_blocks is 3135728,
> should be 3135904. Fix? yes
>
> Running additional passes to resolve blocks claimed by more than one
inode...
> Pass 1B: Rescanning for multiply-claimed blocks Multiply-claimed
> block(s) in inode 4195619: 167904376 167904377 167904378 167904379
> 167904380 167904381 167904382 167904383 167904384 167904385 167904386
> 167949296 167949297 167949298 167949299 167949300 167949301 167949302
> 167949303 167949304 167949305 167949306 Pass 1C: Scanning directories
> for inodes with multiply-claimed blocks Pass 1D: Reconciling
> multiply-claimed blocks (There are 1 inodes containing
> multiply-claimed blocks.)
>
> File /PREMIER/Premier Automation Purchase OrdersApp V18.5.mdb (inode
> #4195619, mod time Fri Apr 26 20:07:42 2013) has 22 multiply-claimed
block(s), shared with 0 file(s):
> Multiply-claimed blocks already reassigned or cloned.
>
> Pass 2: Checking directory structure
> Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference
> counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information
>
> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
> /dev/c/c: 615898/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous),
> 62353456/483393536 blocks
>
> After deleting the file (MS Access DB, and re-creating from backup,
> the file system got mounted read only and the following errors were
> logged:]
>
> May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904376:freeing already freed block
(bit 1144 May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: Aborting journal on device dm-0-8.
> May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs (dm-0: Remounting filesystem
> read-only May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904377:freeing already freed
> block (bit 1145 May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device
> dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904378:freeing already
> freed block (bit 1146 May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error
> (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904379:freeing
> already freed block (bit 1147 May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs
> error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block
> 167904380:freeing already freed block (bit 1148 May 8 14:58:15 despair
> kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group
> 5124block 167904381:freeing already freed block (bit 1149 May 8
> 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904382:freeing already freed
> block (bit 1150 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device
> dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904383:freeing already
> freed block (bit 1151 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error
> (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904384:freeing
> already freed block (bit 1152 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs
> error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block
> 167904385:freeing already freed block (bit 1153 May 8 14:58:16 despair
> kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group
> 5124block 167904386:freeing already freed block (bit 1154 May 8
> 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949296:freeing already freed
> block (bit 13296 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device
> dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949297:freeing already
> freed block (bit 13297 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error
> (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949298:freeing
> already freed block (bit 13298 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs
> error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block
> 167949299:freeing already freed block (bit 13299 May 8 14:58:17
> despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group
> 5125block 167949300:freeing already freed block (bit 13300 May 8
> 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949301:freeing already freed
> block (bit 13301 May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device
> dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949302:freeing already
> freed block (bit 13302 May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error
> (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949303:freeing
> already freed block (bit 13303 May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs
> error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block
> 167949304:freeing already freed block (bit 13304 May 8 14:58:17
> despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group
> 5125block 167949305:freeing already freed block (bit 13305 May 8
> 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949306:freeing already freed
> block (bit 13306
>
>
> These are the same blocks slated as multiply claimed
>
> And then running an FSCK, we got the following:
>
> ***** File system check forced at Wed May 8 15:16:50 WEST 2013 *****
> fsck 1.41.14 (22-Dec-2010 e2fsck 1.42.3 (14-May-2012
> /dev/c/c: recovering journal
> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Pass 2: Checking directory
structure Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference
counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information Free blocks count wrong
for group #5124 (28170, counted=28159.
> Fix? yes
>
> Free blocks count wrong for group #5125 (25861, counted=25850.
> Fix? yes
>
> Free blocks count wrong (420683133, counted=420644972.
> Fix? yes
>
> Free inodes count wrong (29595347, counted=29595271.
> Fix? yes
>
>
> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
> /dev/c/c: 616825/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous,
> 62748564/483393536 blocks
>
> Then later in the year I reloaded the server with the database open
> from several client machines
>
> ***** File system check forced at Tue Jul 23 21:02:13 WEST 2013 ***** fsck
1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) e2fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) Pass 1: Checking inodes,
blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, end of extent exceeds allowed value
> (logical block 64907, physical block 11435403, len 16)
> Clear? yes
>
> Inode 4195619, i_blocks is 1337216, should be 1337176. Fix? yes
>
> Pass 2: Checking directory structure
> Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference
> counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information Block bitmap
> differences: -(11435403--11435407) Fix? yes
>
> Free blocks count wrong for group #348 (2130, counted=2135).
> Fix? yes
>
> Free blocks count wrong (417470107, counted=417470112).
> Fix? yes
>
>
> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
> /dev/c/c: 625785/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous),
> 65923424/483393536 blocks
>
> Again related to the same file, which is only an MS Access DB open from
several client machines over SMB when the server is rebooted. Moving forward
I ensure all instances are closed when reloading but even so I am surprised
that a clean reload causes corruption at the filesystem level.
>
> Since ensuring the DB is closed before reload, I have seen no further
issues like this.
>
> Many Thanks
> Stephen Elliott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zheng Liu [mailto:gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com]
> Sent: 28 October 2013 06:39
> To: Andreas Dilger
> Cc: Stephen Elliott; David Jeffery; linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List;
> Bernd Schubert; Eric Whitney
> Subject: Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
>
> [Cc Eric Whitney to confirm this problem]
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> If I remember correctly, this patch might can fix this problem [1].
>
> 1. http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg39485.html
>
> Regards,
> - Zheng
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:13:26AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>> The error reported here is a relatively new one. It only appeared in
>> e2fsck 1.42.8, and wasn t in the code that I m using locally (1.42.7)
>> so I wasn t sure what it actually meant without looking at it.
>>
>> It looks like some kind of overflow of the extent tree, which causes
>> e2fsck to chop off the last 5 disk blocks (40 sectors), though I m
>> not sure exactly why. From your comments, this can be reproduced
>> with your database usage? Does it use fallocate() or any other
>> strange IO operations that might be causing this?
>>
>> Have you tried updating your kernel? If there is repeated corruption
>> appearing in the filesystem, then it is either a bug in the kernel or
>> in e2fsck. Not really sure which one to blame at this point.
>>
>> Cheers, Andreas
>>
>> On Oct 18, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Stephen Elliott <techweb@ntlworld.com>
wrote:
>>
>>> Any feedback on this guys??? Would really appreciate somebody taking a
look over this.
>>>
>>> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
>>> Sent: 22 September 2013 20:13
>>> To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Andreas
Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
>>> Subject: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have theorised that the problem comes from the MS access DB being open
(over Samba) on client workstations when the server is reloaded.
>>>
>>> Since ensuring these are closed prior to reloading, I have not seen
further FSCK errors on reload. Is there an explanation for this? I can see
why this may corrupt DB but not the filesystem.
>>>
>>> Just as a primer, I used a ReadyNAS NV+ for many years which was running
ext3 and never had this issue. However, since using ext4 on a ReadyNAS Pro,
I now see this issue.
>>>
>>> Many Thanks
>>> Stephen Elliott
>>>
>>> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
>>> Sent: 23 July 2013 22:02
>>> To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Andreas
Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
>>> Subject: RE: FSCK Errors on ext4
>>>
>>> If it helps guys, the same file as before is causing the issue with
inode 4195610, a very large MS access DB.
>>>
>>> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
>>> Sent: 23 July 2013 21:52
>>> To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Andreas
Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
>>> Subject: FSCK Errors on ext4
>>>
>>> Hi Andreas / Bernd / all,
>>>
>>> You may recall advising me on another batch of FSCK errors a few months
back.
>>>
>>> The same device on an ext4 file system has produced the following errors
after a clean reload. It seems to be fine now but wanted your input on this.
No bad blocks are reported on the devices etc.
>>>
>>> ***** File system check forced at Tue Jul 23 21:02:13 WEST 2013 *****
fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) e2fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) Pass 1: Checking
inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, end of extent exceeds allowed value
>>> (logical block 64907, physical block 11435403, len
>>> 16) Clear? yes
>>>
>>> Inode 4195619, i_blocks is 1337216, should be 1337176. Fix? yes
>>>
>>> Pass 2: Checking directory structure Pass 3: Checking directory
>>> connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference counts Pass 5: Checking
>>> group summary information Block bitmap differences:
>>> -(11435403--11435407) Fix? yes
>>>
>>> Free blocks count wrong for group #348 (2130, counted=2135).
>>> Fix? yes
>>>
>>> Free blocks count wrong (417470107, counted=417470112).
>>> Fix? yes
>>>
>>>
>>> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
>>> /dev/c/c: 625785/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous),
>>> 65923424/483393536 blocks
>>>
>>> Many Thanks
>>> Stephen Elliott
>>
>>
>> Cheers, Andreas
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4"
>> in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo
>> info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
Cheers, Andreas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
2013-11-19 12:44 ` Stephen Elliott
@ 2013-11-19 16:46 ` Andreas Dilger
2013-11-19 17:35 ` Stephen Elliott
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Dilger @ 2013-11-19 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Elliott
Cc: Zheng Liu, David Jeffery, <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Bernd Schubert, Eric Whitney
As previously written in earlier comments, the bug is likely in the ext4 code of your appliance, and could possibly be fixed by the patch that was pointed our at that time.
If you ask for help, you actually need to read the replies that are given.
Cheers, Andreas
On 2013-11-19, at 5:44, "Stephen Elliott" <techweb@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Did you have any further feedback on this? It is purely curiosity for me:
>
> I have theorised that the problem comes from the MS access DB being open
> (over Samba) on client workstations when the server is reloaded.
>
> Since ensuring these are closed prior to reloading, I have not seen further
> FSCK errors on reload. Is there an explanation for this? I can see why this
> may corrupt DB but not the filesystem.
>
> Many Thanks
> Stephen Elliott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
> Sent: 28 October 2013 21:18
> To: 'Andreas Dilger'
> Cc: 'Zheng Liu'; 'David Jeffery'; 'linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List'; 'Bernd
> Schubert'; 'Eric Whitney'
> Subject: RE: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
>
> Ultimately I am not too worried about this problem (now I know the cause)
> but I am intrigued to know what actually caused the issue in the first
> place. As you can see there is some history around the problem.
>
> Also was that defect / bug actually confirmed?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Dilger [mailto:adilger@dilger.ca]
> Sent: 28 October 2013 20:54
> To: Stephen Elliott
> Cc: Zheng Liu; David Jeffery; linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List; Bernd
> Schubert; Eric Whitney
> Subject: Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
>
> On Oct 28, 2013, at 3:00 AM, Stephen Elliott <techweb@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>> Thanks for the reply guys...
>>
>> The device in question is a ReadyNAS Pro 6, which happens to be running
> Linux :) I actually saw some issues with e2fsck 1.42.3 earlier this year:
>
> So it looks like your next course of action is to contact ReadyNAS to see if
> they have the patch that Zheng mentioned below in their kernel.
>
> Cheers, Andreas
>
>> ***** File system check forced at Fri Apr 26 20:08:38 WEST 2013 *****
>> fsck 1.41.14 (22-Dec-2010) e2fsck 1.42.3 (14-May-2012) Pass 1:
>> Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, i_blocks is 3135728,
>> should be 3135904. Fix? yes
>>
>> Running additional passes to resolve blocks claimed by more than one
> inode...
>> Pass 1B: Rescanning for multiply-claimed blocks Multiply-claimed
>> block(s) in inode 4195619: 167904376 167904377 167904378 167904379
>> 167904380 167904381 167904382 167904383 167904384 167904385 167904386
>> 167949296 167949297 167949298 167949299 167949300 167949301 167949302
>> 167949303 167949304 167949305 167949306 Pass 1C: Scanning directories
>> for inodes with multiply-claimed blocks Pass 1D: Reconciling
>> multiply-claimed blocks (There are 1 inodes containing
>> multiply-claimed blocks.)
>>
>> File /PREMIER/Premier Automation Purchase OrdersApp V18.5.mdb (inode
>> #4195619, mod time Fri Apr 26 20:07:42 2013) has 22 multiply-claimed
> block(s), shared with 0 file(s):
>> Multiply-claimed blocks already reassigned or cloned.
>>
>> Pass 2: Checking directory structure
>> Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference
>> counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information
>>
>> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
>> /dev/c/c: 615898/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous),
>> 62353456/483393536 blocks
>>
>> After deleting the file (MS Access DB, and re-creating from backup,
>> the file system got mounted read only and the following errors were
>> logged:]
>>
>> May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
>> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904376:freeing already freed block
> (bit 1144 May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: Aborting journal on device dm-0-8.
>> May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs (dm-0: Remounting filesystem
>> read-only May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
>> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904377:freeing already freed
>> block (bit 1145 May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device
>> dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904378:freeing already
>> freed block (bit 1146 May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error
>> (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904379:freeing
>> already freed block (bit 1147 May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs
>> error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block
>> 167904380:freeing already freed block (bit 1148 May 8 14:58:15 despair
>> kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group
>> 5124block 167904381:freeing already freed block (bit 1149 May 8
>> 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
>> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904382:freeing already freed
>> block (bit 1150 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device
>> dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904383:freeing already
>> freed block (bit 1151 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error
>> (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904384:freeing
>> already freed block (bit 1152 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs
>> error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block
>> 167904385:freeing already freed block (bit 1153 May 8 14:58:16 despair
>> kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group
>> 5124block 167904386:freeing already freed block (bit 1154 May 8
>> 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
>> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949296:freeing already freed
>> block (bit 13296 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device
>> dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949297:freeing already
>> freed block (bit 13297 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error
>> (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949298:freeing
>> already freed block (bit 13298 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs
>> error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block
>> 167949299:freeing already freed block (bit 13299 May 8 14:58:17
>> despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group
>> 5125block 167949300:freeing already freed block (bit 13300 May 8
>> 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
>> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949301:freeing already freed
>> block (bit 13301 May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device
>> dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949302:freeing already
>> freed block (bit 13302 May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error
>> (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949303:freeing
>> already freed block (bit 13303 May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs
>> error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block
>> 167949304:freeing already freed block (bit 13304 May 8 14:58:17
>> despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group
>> 5125block 167949305:freeing already freed block (bit 13305 May 8
>> 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
>> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949306:freeing already freed
>> block (bit 13306
>>
>>
>> These are the same blocks slated as multiply claimed
>>
>> And then running an FSCK, we got the following:
>>
>> ***** File system check forced at Wed May 8 15:16:50 WEST 2013 *****
>> fsck 1.41.14 (22-Dec-2010 e2fsck 1.42.3 (14-May-2012
>> /dev/c/c: recovering journal
>> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Pass 2: Checking directory
> structure Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference
> counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information Free blocks count wrong
> for group #5124 (28170, counted=28159.
>> Fix? yes
>>
>> Free blocks count wrong for group #5125 (25861, counted=25850.
>> Fix? yes
>>
>> Free blocks count wrong (420683133, counted=420644972.
>> Fix? yes
>>
>> Free inodes count wrong (29595347, counted=29595271.
>> Fix? yes
>>
>>
>> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
>> /dev/c/c: 616825/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous,
>> 62748564/483393536 blocks
>>
>> Then later in the year I reloaded the server with the database open
>> from several client machines
>>
>> ***** File system check forced at Tue Jul 23 21:02:13 WEST 2013 ***** fsck
> 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) e2fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) Pass 1: Checking inodes,
> blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, end of extent exceeds allowed value
>> (logical block 64907, physical block 11435403, len 16)
>> Clear? yes
>>
>> Inode 4195619, i_blocks is 1337216, should be 1337176. Fix? yes
>>
>> Pass 2: Checking directory structure
>> Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference
>> counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information Block bitmap
>> differences: -(11435403--11435407) Fix? yes
>>
>> Free blocks count wrong for group #348 (2130, counted=2135).
>> Fix? yes
>>
>> Free blocks count wrong (417470107, counted=417470112).
>> Fix? yes
>>
>>
>> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
>> /dev/c/c: 625785/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous),
>> 65923424/483393536 blocks
>>
>> Again related to the same file, which is only an MS Access DB open from
> several client machines over SMB when the server is rebooted. Moving forward
> I ensure all instances are closed when reloading but even so I am surprised
> that a clean reload causes corruption at the filesystem level.
>>
>> Since ensuring the DB is closed before reload, I have seen no further
> issues like this.
>>
>> Many Thanks
>> Stephen Elliott
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Zheng Liu [mailto:gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 28 October 2013 06:39
>> To: Andreas Dilger
>> Cc: Stephen Elliott; David Jeffery; linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List;
>> Bernd Schubert; Eric Whitney
>> Subject: Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
>>
>> [Cc Eric Whitney to confirm this problem]
>>
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> If I remember correctly, this patch might can fix this problem [1].
>>
>> 1. http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg39485.html
>>
>> Regards,
>> - Zheng
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:13:26AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>>> The error reported here is a relatively new one. It only appeared in
>>> e2fsck 1.42.8, and wasn t in the code that I m using locally (1.42.7)
>>> so I wasn t sure what it actually meant without looking at it.
>>>
>>> It looks like some kind of overflow of the extent tree, which causes
>>> e2fsck to chop off the last 5 disk blocks (40 sectors), though I m
>>> not sure exactly why. From your comments, this can be reproduced
>>> with your database usage? Does it use fallocate() or any other
>>> strange IO operations that might be causing this?
>>>
>>> Have you tried updating your kernel? If there is repeated corruption
>>> appearing in the filesystem, then it is either a bug in the kernel or
>>> in e2fsck. Not really sure which one to blame at this point.
>>>
>>> Cheers, Andreas
>>>
>>> On Oct 18, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Stephen Elliott <techweb@ntlworld.com>
> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Any feedback on this guys??? Would really appreciate somebody taking a
> look over this.
>>>>
>>>> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
>>>> Sent: 22 September 2013 20:13
>>>> To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Andreas
> Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
>>>> Subject: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I have theorised that the problem comes from the MS access DB being open
> (over Samba) on client workstations when the server is reloaded.
>>>>
>>>> Since ensuring these are closed prior to reloading, I have not seen
> further FSCK errors on reload. Is there an explanation for this? I can see
> why this may corrupt DB but not the filesystem.
>>>>
>>>> Just as a primer, I used a ReadyNAS NV+ for many years which was running
> ext3 and never had this issue. However, since using ext4 on a ReadyNAS Pro,
> I now see this issue.
>>>>
>>>> Many Thanks
>>>> Stephen Elliott
>>>>
>>>> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
>>>> Sent: 23 July 2013 22:02
>>>> To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Andreas
> Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
>>>> Subject: RE: FSCK Errors on ext4
>>>>
>>>> If it helps guys, the same file as before is causing the issue with
> inode 4195610, a very large MS access DB.
>>>>
>>>> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
>>>> Sent: 23 July 2013 21:52
>>>> To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Andreas
> Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
>>>> Subject: FSCK Errors on ext4
>>>>
>>>> Hi Andreas / Bernd / all,
>>>>
>>>> You may recall advising me on another batch of FSCK errors a few months
> back.
>>>>
>>>> The same device on an ext4 file system has produced the following errors
> after a clean reload. It seems to be fine now but wanted your input on this.
> No bad blocks are reported on the devices etc.
>>>>
>>>> ***** File system check forced at Tue Jul 23 21:02:13 WEST 2013 *****
> fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) e2fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) Pass 1: Checking
> inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, end of extent exceeds allowed value
>>>> (logical block 64907, physical block 11435403, len
>>>> 16) Clear? yes
>>>>
>>>> Inode 4195619, i_blocks is 1337216, should be 1337176. Fix? yes
>>>>
>>>> Pass 2: Checking directory structure Pass 3: Checking directory
>>>> connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference counts Pass 5: Checking
>>>> group summary information Block bitmap differences:
>>>> -(11435403--11435407) Fix? yes
>>>>
>>>> Free blocks count wrong for group #348 (2130, counted=2135).
>>>> Fix? yes
>>>>
>>>> Free blocks count wrong (417470107, counted=417470112).
>>>> Fix? yes
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
>>>> /dev/c/c: 625785/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous),
>>>> 65923424/483393536 blocks
>>>>
>>>> Many Thanks
>>>> Stephen Elliott
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers, Andreas
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4"
>>> in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo
>>> info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
> Cheers, Andreas
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* RE: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
2013-11-19 16:46 ` Andreas Dilger
@ 2013-11-19 17:35 ` Stephen Elliott
2013-11-19 20:27 ` Andreas Dilger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Elliott @ 2013-11-19 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Andreas Dilger'
Cc: 'Zheng Liu', 'David Jeffery',
linux-ext4, 'Bernd Schubert', 'Eric Whitney'
Hi Andreas,
I have read the replies given, I am just questioning some of the analysis
and have follow up questions.
You will notice that I previously mentioned in this mail thread that I had
this issue prior to running e2fsck 1.42.8 on e2fsck 1.42.3 too so not
entirely convinced that the aforementioned patch is applicable.
My main question is around why this issue seems to occur when the MS access
DB being open (over Samba) on client workstations when the server is
reloaded. I would possibly expect DB corruption due to this but not FS
corruption.
Many Thanks
Stephen Elliott
-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas Dilger [mailto:adilger@dilger.ca]
Sent: 19 November 2013 16:47
To: Stephen Elliott
Cc: Zheng Liu; David Jeffery; <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>; Bernd Schubert;
Eric Whitney
Subject: Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
As previously written in earlier comments, the bug is likely in the ext4
code of your appliance, and could possibly be fixed by the patch that was
pointed our at that time.
If you ask for help, you actually need to read the replies that are given.
Cheers, Andreas
On 2013-11-19, at 5:44, "Stephen Elliott" <techweb@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Did you have any further feedback on this? It is purely curiosity for me:
>
> I have theorised that the problem comes from the MS access DB being
> open (over Samba) on client workstations when the server is reloaded.
>
> Since ensuring these are closed prior to reloading, I have not seen
> further FSCK errors on reload. Is there an explanation for this? I can
> see why this may corrupt DB but not the filesystem.
>
> Many Thanks
> Stephen Elliott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
> Sent: 28 October 2013 21:18
> To: 'Andreas Dilger'
> Cc: 'Zheng Liu'; 'David Jeffery'; 'linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List';
> 'Bernd Schubert'; 'Eric Whitney'
> Subject: RE: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
>
> Ultimately I am not too worried about this problem (now I know the
> cause) but I am intrigued to know what actually caused the issue in
> the first place. As you can see there is some history around the problem.
>
> Also was that defect / bug actually confirmed?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Dilger [mailto:adilger@dilger.ca]
> Sent: 28 October 2013 20:54
> To: Stephen Elliott
> Cc: Zheng Liu; David Jeffery; linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List; Bernd
> Schubert; Eric Whitney
> Subject: Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
>
> On Oct 28, 2013, at 3:00 AM, Stephen Elliott <techweb@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>> Thanks for the reply guys...
>>
>> The device in question is a ReadyNAS Pro 6, which happens to be
>> running
> Linux :) I actually saw some issues with e2fsck 1.42.3 earlier this year:
>
> So it looks like your next course of action is to contact ReadyNAS to
> see if they have the patch that Zheng mentioned below in their kernel.
>
> Cheers, Andreas
>
>> ***** File system check forced at Fri Apr 26 20:08:38 WEST 2013 *****
>> fsck 1.41.14 (22-Dec-2010) e2fsck 1.42.3 (14-May-2012) Pass 1:
>> Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, i_blocks is
>> 3135728, should be 3135904. Fix? yes
>>
>> Running additional passes to resolve blocks claimed by more than one
> inode...
>> Pass 1B: Rescanning for multiply-claimed blocks Multiply-claimed
>> block(s) in inode 4195619: 167904376 167904377 167904378 167904379
>> 167904380 167904381 167904382 167904383 167904384 167904385 167904386
>> 167949296 167949297 167949298 167949299 167949300 167949301 167949302
>> 167949303 167949304 167949305 167949306 Pass 1C: Scanning directories
>> for inodes with multiply-claimed blocks Pass 1D: Reconciling
>> multiply-claimed blocks (There are 1 inodes containing
>> multiply-claimed blocks.)
>>
>> File /PREMIER/Premier Automation Purchase OrdersApp V18.5.mdb (inode
>> #4195619, mod time Fri Apr 26 20:07:42 2013) has 22 multiply-claimed
> block(s), shared with 0 file(s):
>> Multiply-claimed blocks already reassigned or cloned.
>>
>> Pass 2: Checking directory structure
>> Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference
>> counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information
>>
>> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
>> /dev/c/c: 615898/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous),
>> 62353456/483393536 blocks
>>
>> After deleting the file (MS Access DB, and re-creating from backup,
>> the file system got mounted read only and the following errors were
>> logged:]
>>
>> May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
>> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904376:freeing already freed
>> block
> (bit 1144 May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: Aborting journal on device
dm-0-8.
>> May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs (dm-0: Remounting filesystem
>> read-only May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
>> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904377:freeing already freed
>> block (bit 1145 May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device
>> dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904378:freeing already
>> freed block (bit 1146 May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error
>> (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904379:freeing
>> already freed block (bit 1147 May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs
>> error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block
>> 167904380:freeing already freed block (bit 1148 May 8 14:58:15
>> despair
>> kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group
>> 5124block 167904381:freeing already freed block (bit 1149 May 8
>> 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
>> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904382:freeing already freed
>> block (bit 1150 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device
>> dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904383:freeing already
>> freed block (bit 1151 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error
>> (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904384:freeing
>> already freed block (bit 1152 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs
>> error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block
>> 167904385:freeing already freed block (bit 1153 May 8 14:58:16
>> despair
>> kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group
>> 5124block 167904386:freeing already freed block (bit 1154 May 8
>> 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
>> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949296:freeing already freed
>> block (bit 13296 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device
>> dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949297:freeing already
>> freed block (bit 13297 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error
>> (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949298:freeing
>> already freed block (bit 13298 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs
>> error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block
>> 167949299:freeing already freed block (bit 13299 May 8 14:58:17
>> despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411:
>> group 5125block 167949300:freeing already freed block (bit 13300 May
>> 8
>> 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
>> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949301:freeing already freed
>> block (bit 13301 May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device
>> dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949302:freeing already
>> freed block (bit 13302 May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error
>> (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949303:freeing
>> already freed block (bit 13303 May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs
>> error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block
>> 167949304:freeing already freed block (bit 13304 May 8 14:58:17
>> despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411:
>> group 5125block 167949305:freeing already freed block (bit 13305 May
>> 8
>> 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
>> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949306:freeing already freed
>> block (bit 13306
>>
>>
>> These are the same blocks slated as multiply claimed
>>
>> And then running an FSCK, we got the following:
>>
>> ***** File system check forced at Wed May 8 15:16:50 WEST 2013 *****
>> fsck 1.41.14 (22-Dec-2010 e2fsck 1.42.3 (14-May-2012
>> /dev/c/c: recovering journal
>> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Pass 2: Checking directory
> structure Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking
> reference counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information Free
> blocks count wrong for group #5124 (28170, counted=28159.
>> Fix? yes
>>
>> Free blocks count wrong for group #5125 (25861, counted=25850.
>> Fix? yes
>>
>> Free blocks count wrong (420683133, counted=420644972.
>> Fix? yes
>>
>> Free inodes count wrong (29595347, counted=29595271.
>> Fix? yes
>>
>>
>> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
>> /dev/c/c: 616825/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous,
>> 62748564/483393536 blocks
>>
>> Then later in the year I reloaded the server with the database open
>> from several client machines
>>
>> ***** File system check forced at Tue Jul 23 21:02:13 WEST 2013 *****
>> fsck
> 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) e2fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) Pass 1: Checking
> inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, end of extent exceeds allowed
> value
>> (logical block 64907, physical block 11435403, len 16)
>> Clear? yes
>>
>> Inode 4195619, i_blocks is 1337216, should be 1337176. Fix? yes
>>
>> Pass 2: Checking directory structure
>> Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference
>> counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information Block bitmap
>> differences: -(11435403--11435407) Fix? yes
>>
>> Free blocks count wrong for group #348 (2130, counted=2135).
>> Fix? yes
>>
>> Free blocks count wrong (417470107, counted=417470112).
>> Fix? yes
>>
>>
>> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
>> /dev/c/c: 625785/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous),
>> 65923424/483393536 blocks
>>
>> Again related to the same file, which is only an MS Access DB open
>> from
> several client machines over SMB when the server is rebooted. Moving
> forward I ensure all instances are closed when reloading but even so I
> am surprised that a clean reload causes corruption at the filesystem
level.
>>
>> Since ensuring the DB is closed before reload, I have seen no further
> issues like this.
>>
>> Many Thanks
>> Stephen Elliott
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Zheng Liu [mailto:gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 28 October 2013 06:39
>> To: Andreas Dilger
>> Cc: Stephen Elliott; David Jeffery; linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List;
>> Bernd Schubert; Eric Whitney
>> Subject: Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
>>
>> [Cc Eric Whitney to confirm this problem]
>>
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> If I remember correctly, this patch might can fix this problem [1].
>>
>> 1. http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg39485.html
>>
>> Regards,
>> - Zheng
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:13:26AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>>> The error reported here is a relatively new one. It only appeared
>>> in e2fsck 1.42.8, and wasn t in the code that I m using locally
>>> (1.42.7) so I wasn t sure what it actually meant without looking at it.
>>>
>>> It looks like some kind of overflow of the extent tree, which causes
>>> e2fsck to chop off the last 5 disk blocks (40 sectors), though I m
>>> not sure exactly why. From your comments, this can be reproduced
>>> with your database usage? Does it use fallocate() or any other
>>> strange IO operations that might be causing this?
>>>
>>> Have you tried updating your kernel? If there is repeated
>>> corruption appearing in the filesystem, then it is either a bug in
>>> the kernel or in e2fsck. Not really sure which one to blame at this
point.
>>>
>>> Cheers, Andreas
>>>
>>> On Oct 18, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Stephen Elliott <techweb@ntlworld.com>
> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Any feedback on this guys??? Would really appreciate somebody
>>>> taking a
> look over this.
>>>>
>>>> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
>>>> Sent: 22 September 2013 20:13
>>>> To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org;
>>>> Andreas
> Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
>>>> Subject: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I have theorised that the problem comes from the MS access DB being
>>>> open
> (over Samba) on client workstations when the server is reloaded.
>>>>
>>>> Since ensuring these are closed prior to reloading, I have not seen
> further FSCK errors on reload. Is there an explanation for this? I can
> see why this may corrupt DB but not the filesystem.
>>>>
>>>> Just as a primer, I used a ReadyNAS NV+ for many years which was
>>>> running
> ext3 and never had this issue. However, since using ext4 on a ReadyNAS
> Pro, I now see this issue.
>>>>
>>>> Many Thanks
>>>> Stephen Elliott
>>>>
>>>> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
>>>> Sent: 23 July 2013 22:02
>>>> To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org;
>>>> Andreas
> Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
>>>> Subject: RE: FSCK Errors on ext4
>>>>
>>>> If it helps guys, the same file as before is causing the issue with
> inode 4195610, a very large MS access DB.
>>>>
>>>> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
>>>> Sent: 23 July 2013 21:52
>>>> To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org;
>>>> Andreas
> Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
>>>> Subject: FSCK Errors on ext4
>>>>
>>>> Hi Andreas / Bernd / all,
>>>>
>>>> You may recall advising me on another batch of FSCK errors a few
>>>> months
> back.
>>>>
>>>> The same device on an ext4 file system has produced the following
>>>> errors
> after a clean reload. It seems to be fine now but wanted your input on
this.
> No bad blocks are reported on the devices etc.
>>>>
>>>> ***** File system check forced at Tue Jul 23 21:02:13 WEST 2013
>>>> *****
> fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) e2fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) Pass 1: Checking
> inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, end of extent exceeds allowed
> value
>>>> (logical block 64907, physical block 11435403, len
>>>> 16) Clear? yes
>>>>
>>>> Inode 4195619, i_blocks is 1337216, should be 1337176. Fix? yes
>>>>
>>>> Pass 2: Checking directory structure Pass 3: Checking directory
>>>> connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference counts Pass 5: Checking
>>>> group summary information Block bitmap differences:
>>>> -(11435403--11435407) Fix? yes
>>>>
>>>> Free blocks count wrong for group #348 (2130, counted=2135).
>>>> Fix? yes
>>>>
>>>> Free blocks count wrong (417470107, counted=417470112).
>>>> Fix? yes
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
>>>> /dev/c/c: 625785/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous),
>>>> 65923424/483393536 blocks
>>>>
>>>> Many Thanks
>>>> Stephen Elliott
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers, Andreas
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4"
>>> in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo
>>> info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
> Cheers, Andreas
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
2013-11-19 17:35 ` Stephen Elliott
@ 2013-11-19 20:27 ` Andreas Dilger
2013-11-19 20:48 ` Stephen Elliott
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Dilger @ 2013-11-19 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Elliott
Cc: Zheng Liu, David Jeffery, <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Bernd Schubert, Eric Whitney
It definitely shouldn't be possible for any application to corrupt the filesystem, so regardless of what is being run this is a kernel bug.
Cheers, Andreas
On 2013-11-19, at 10:35, "Stephen Elliott" <techweb@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> I have read the replies given, I am just questioning some of the analysis
> and have follow up questions.
>
> You will notice that I previously mentioned in this mail thread that I had
> this issue prior to running e2fsck 1.42.8 on e2fsck 1.42.3 too so not
> entirely convinced that the aforementioned patch is applicable.
>
> My main question is around why this issue seems to occur when the MS access
> DB being open (over Samba) on client workstations when the server is
> reloaded. I would possibly expect DB corruption due to this but not FS
> corruption.
>
> Many Thanks
> Stephen Elliott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Dilger [mailto:adilger@dilger.ca]
> Sent: 19 November 2013 16:47
> To: Stephen Elliott
> Cc: Zheng Liu; David Jeffery; <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>; Bernd Schubert;
> Eric Whitney
> Subject: Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
>
> As previously written in earlier comments, the bug is likely in the ext4
> code of your appliance, and could possibly be fixed by the patch that was
> pointed our at that time.
>
> If you ask for help, you actually need to read the replies that are given.
>
> Cheers, Andreas
>
> On 2013-11-19, at 5:44, "Stephen Elliott" <techweb@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> Did you have any further feedback on this? It is purely curiosity for me:
>>
>> I have theorised that the problem comes from the MS access DB being
>> open (over Samba) on client workstations when the server is reloaded.
>>
>> Since ensuring these are closed prior to reloading, I have not seen
>> further FSCK errors on reload. Is there an explanation for this? I can
>> see why this may corrupt DB but not the filesystem.
>>
>> Many Thanks
>> Stephen Elliott
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
>> Sent: 28 October 2013 21:18
>> To: 'Andreas Dilger'
>> Cc: 'Zheng Liu'; 'David Jeffery'; 'linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List';
>> 'Bernd Schubert'; 'Eric Whitney'
>> Subject: RE: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
>>
>> Ultimately I am not too worried about this problem (now I know the
>> cause) but I am intrigued to know what actually caused the issue in
>> the first place. As you can see there is some history around the problem.
>>
>> Also was that defect / bug actually confirmed?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andreas Dilger [mailto:adilger@dilger.ca]
>> Sent: 28 October 2013 20:54
>> To: Stephen Elliott
>> Cc: Zheng Liu; David Jeffery; linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List; Bernd
>> Schubert; Eric Whitney
>> Subject: Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
>>
>> On Oct 28, 2013, at 3:00 AM, Stephen Elliott <techweb@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks for the reply guys...
>>>
>>> The device in question is a ReadyNAS Pro 6, which happens to be
>>> running
>> Linux :) I actually saw some issues with e2fsck 1.42.3 earlier this year:
>>
>> So it looks like your next course of action is to contact ReadyNAS to
>> see if they have the patch that Zheng mentioned below in their kernel.
>>
>> Cheers, Andreas
>>
>>> ***** File system check forced at Fri Apr 26 20:08:38 WEST 2013 *****
>>> fsck 1.41.14 (22-Dec-2010) e2fsck 1.42.3 (14-May-2012) Pass 1:
>>> Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, i_blocks is
>>> 3135728, should be 3135904. Fix? yes
>>>
>>> Running additional passes to resolve blocks claimed by more than one
>> inode...
>>> Pass 1B: Rescanning for multiply-claimed blocks Multiply-claimed
>>> block(s) in inode 4195619: 167904376 167904377 167904378 167904379
>>> 167904380 167904381 167904382 167904383 167904384 167904385 167904386
>>> 167949296 167949297 167949298 167949299 167949300 167949301 167949302
>>> 167949303 167949304 167949305 167949306 Pass 1C: Scanning directories
>>> for inodes with multiply-claimed blocks Pass 1D: Reconciling
>>> multiply-claimed blocks (There are 1 inodes containing
>>> multiply-claimed blocks.)
>>>
>>> File /PREMIER/Premier Automation Purchase OrdersApp V18.5.mdb (inode
>>> #4195619, mod time Fri Apr 26 20:07:42 2013) has 22 multiply-claimed
>> block(s), shared with 0 file(s):
>>> Multiply-claimed blocks already reassigned or cloned.
>>>
>>> Pass 2: Checking directory structure
>>> Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference
>>> counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information
>>>
>>> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
>>> /dev/c/c: 615898/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous),
>>> 62353456/483393536 blocks
>>>
>>> After deleting the file (MS Access DB, and re-creating from backup,
>>> the file system got mounted read only and the following errors were
>>> logged:]
>>>
>>> May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
>>> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904376:freeing already freed
>>> block
>> (bit 1144 May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: Aborting journal on device
> dm-0-8.
>>> May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs (dm-0: Remounting filesystem
>>> read-only May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
>>> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904377:freeing already freed
>>> block (bit 1145 May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device
>>> dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904378:freeing already
>>> freed block (bit 1146 May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error
>>> (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904379:freeing
>>> already freed block (bit 1147 May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs
>>> error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block
>>> 167904380:freeing already freed block (bit 1148 May 8 14:58:15
>>> despair
>>> kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group
>>> 5124block 167904381:freeing already freed block (bit 1149 May 8
>>> 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
>>> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904382:freeing already freed
>>> block (bit 1150 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device
>>> dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904383:freeing already
>>> freed block (bit 1151 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error
>>> (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904384:freeing
>>> already freed block (bit 1152 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs
>>> error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block
>>> 167904385:freeing already freed block (bit 1153 May 8 14:58:16
>>> despair
>>> kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group
>>> 5124block 167904386:freeing already freed block (bit 1154 May 8
>>> 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
>>> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949296:freeing already freed
>>> block (bit 13296 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device
>>> dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949297:freeing already
>>> freed block (bit 13297 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error
>>> (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949298:freeing
>>> already freed block (bit 13298 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs
>>> error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block
>>> 167949299:freeing already freed block (bit 13299 May 8 14:58:17
>>> despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411:
>>> group 5125block 167949300:freeing already freed block (bit 13300 May
>>> 8
>>> 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
>>> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949301:freeing already freed
>>> block (bit 13301 May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device
>>> dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949302:freeing already
>>> freed block (bit 13302 May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error
>>> (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949303:freeing
>>> already freed block (bit 13303 May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs
>>> error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block
>>> 167949304:freeing already freed block (bit 13304 May 8 14:58:17
>>> despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411:
>>> group 5125block 167949305:freeing already freed block (bit 13305 May
>>> 8
>>> 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
>>> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949306:freeing already freed
>>> block (bit 13306
>>>
>>>
>>> These are the same blocks slated as multiply claimed
>>>
>>> And then running an FSCK, we got the following:
>>>
>>> ***** File system check forced at Wed May 8 15:16:50 WEST 2013 *****
>>> fsck 1.41.14 (22-Dec-2010 e2fsck 1.42.3 (14-May-2012
>>> /dev/c/c: recovering journal
>>> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Pass 2: Checking directory
>> structure Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking
>> reference counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information Free
>> blocks count wrong for group #5124 (28170, counted=28159.
>>> Fix? yes
>>>
>>> Free blocks count wrong for group #5125 (25861, counted=25850.
>>> Fix? yes
>>>
>>> Free blocks count wrong (420683133, counted=420644972.
>>> Fix? yes
>>>
>>> Free inodes count wrong (29595347, counted=29595271.
>>> Fix? yes
>>>
>>>
>>> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
>>> /dev/c/c: 616825/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous,
>>> 62748564/483393536 blocks
>>>
>>> Then later in the year I reloaded the server with the database open
>>> from several client machines
>>>
>>> ***** File system check forced at Tue Jul 23 21:02:13 WEST 2013 *****
>>> fsck
>> 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) e2fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) Pass 1: Checking
>> inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, end of extent exceeds allowed
>> value
>>> (logical block 64907, physical block 11435403, len 16)
>>> Clear? yes
>>>
>>> Inode 4195619, i_blocks is 1337216, should be 1337176. Fix? yes
>>>
>>> Pass 2: Checking directory structure
>>> Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference
>>> counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information Block bitmap
>>> differences: -(11435403--11435407) Fix? yes
>>>
>>> Free blocks count wrong for group #348 (2130, counted=2135).
>>> Fix? yes
>>>
>>> Free blocks count wrong (417470107, counted=417470112).
>>> Fix? yes
>>>
>>>
>>> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
>>> /dev/c/c: 625785/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous),
>>> 65923424/483393536 blocks
>>>
>>> Again related to the same file, which is only an MS Access DB open
>>> from
>> several client machines over SMB when the server is rebooted. Moving
>> forward I ensure all instances are closed when reloading but even so I
>> am surprised that a clean reload causes corruption at the filesystem
> level.
>>>
>>> Since ensuring the DB is closed before reload, I have seen no further
>> issues like this.
>>>
>>> Many Thanks
>>> Stephen Elliott
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Zheng Liu [mailto:gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: 28 October 2013 06:39
>>> To: Andreas Dilger
>>> Cc: Stephen Elliott; David Jeffery; linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List;
>>> Bernd Schubert; Eric Whitney
>>> Subject: Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
>>>
>>> [Cc Eric Whitney to confirm this problem]
>>>
>>> Hi Andreas,
>>>
>>> If I remember correctly, this patch might can fix this problem [1].
>>>
>>> 1. http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg39485.html
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> - Zheng
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:13:26AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>>>> The error reported here is a relatively new one. It only appeared
>>>> in e2fsck 1.42.8, and wasn t in the code that I m using locally
>>>> (1.42.7) so I wasn t sure what it actually meant without looking at it.
>>>>
>>>> It looks like some kind of overflow of the extent tree, which causes
>>>> e2fsck to chop off the last 5 disk blocks (40 sectors), though I m
>>>> not sure exactly why. From your comments, this can be reproduced
>>>> with your database usage? Does it use fallocate() or any other
>>>> strange IO operations that might be causing this?
>>>>
>>>> Have you tried updating your kernel? If there is repeated
>>>> corruption appearing in the filesystem, then it is either a bug in
>>>> the kernel or in e2fsck. Not really sure which one to blame at this
> point.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers, Andreas
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 18, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Stephen Elliott <techweb@ntlworld.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Any feedback on this guys??? Would really appreciate somebody
>>>>> taking a
>> look over this.
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
>>>>> Sent: 22 September 2013 20:13
>>>>> To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org;
>>>>> Andreas
>> Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
>>>>> Subject: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have theorised that the problem comes from the MS access DB being
>>>>> open
>> (over Samba) on client workstations when the server is reloaded.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since ensuring these are closed prior to reloading, I have not seen
>> further FSCK errors on reload. Is there an explanation for this? I can
>> see why this may corrupt DB but not the filesystem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just as a primer, I used a ReadyNAS NV+ for many years which was
>>>>> running
>> ext3 and never had this issue. However, since using ext4 on a ReadyNAS
>> Pro, I now see this issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> Many Thanks
>>>>> Stephen Elliott
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
>>>>> Sent: 23 July 2013 22:02
>>>>> To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org;
>>>>> Andreas
>> Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
>>>>> Subject: RE: FSCK Errors on ext4
>>>>>
>>>>> If it helps guys, the same file as before is causing the issue with
>> inode 4195610, a very large MS access DB.
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
>>>>> Sent: 23 July 2013 21:52
>>>>> To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org;
>>>>> Andreas
>> Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
>>>>> Subject: FSCK Errors on ext4
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Andreas / Bernd / all,
>>>>>
>>>>> You may recall advising me on another batch of FSCK errors a few
>>>>> months
>> back.
>>>>>
>>>>> The same device on an ext4 file system has produced the following
>>>>> errors
>> after a clean reload. It seems to be fine now but wanted your input on
> this.
>> No bad blocks are reported on the devices etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> ***** File system check forced at Tue Jul 23 21:02:13 WEST 2013
>>>>> *****
>> fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) e2fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) Pass 1: Checking
>> inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, end of extent exceeds allowed
>> value
>>>>> (logical block 64907, physical block 11435403, len
>>>>> 16) Clear? yes
>>>>>
>>>>> Inode 4195619, i_blocks is 1337216, should be 1337176. Fix? yes
>>>>>
>>>>> Pass 2: Checking directory structure Pass 3: Checking directory
>>>>> connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference counts Pass 5: Checking
>>>>> group summary information Block bitmap differences:
>>>>> -(11435403--11435407) Fix? yes
>>>>>
>>>>> Free blocks count wrong for group #348 (2130, counted=2135).
>>>>> Fix? yes
>>>>>
>>>>> Free blocks count wrong (417470107, counted=417470112).
>>>>> Fix? yes
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
>>>>> /dev/c/c: 625785/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous),
>>>>> 65923424/483393536 blocks
>>>>>
>>>>> Many Thanks
>>>>> Stephen Elliott
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers, Andreas
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4"
>>>> in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo
>>>> info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>>
>> Cheers, Andreas
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* RE: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
2013-11-19 20:27 ` Andreas Dilger
@ 2013-11-19 20:48 ` Stephen Elliott
[not found] ` <C8263588-E5AD-4C23-81E3-5852DE3B1FC5@dilger.ca>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Elliott @ 2013-11-19 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Andreas Dilger'
Cc: 'Zheng Liu', 'David Jeffery',
linux-ext4, 'Bernd Schubert', 'Eric Whitney'
Question is finding / decoding it...
If it were a test / lab system I could run whatever you want me to in order
to find root cause. Problem is that it's a customer server (ReadyNAS Pro 6)
running a large DB in excess of 800 Mb with multiple users accessing over
SMB. I empirically discovered that closing the client connections to the MS
Access DB stops the file system corruption which happens on every reboot
otherwise.
If you guys have the bandwidth and inclination to check this on a system
then I guess initial repro may be simple if it doesn't show up then it may
be something more specific.
(Linux despair 2.6.37.6.RNx86_64.2.4 #1 SMP Thu Jul 26 05:00:36 PDT 2012
x86_64 GNU/Linux)
It's hardly the end of the world for me / my customer, I just advise they
close connections prior to rebooting the server.
-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas Dilger [mailto:adilger@dilger.ca]
Sent: 19 November 2013 20:28
To: Stephen Elliott
Cc: Zheng Liu; David Jeffery; <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>; Bernd Schubert;
Eric Whitney
Subject: Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
It definitely shouldn't be possible for any application to corrupt the
filesystem, so regardless of what is being run this is a kernel bug.
Cheers, Andreas
On 2013-11-19, at 10:35, "Stephen Elliott" <techweb@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> I have read the replies given, I am just questioning some of the
> analysis and have follow up questions.
>
> You will notice that I previously mentioned in this mail thread that I
> had this issue prior to running e2fsck 1.42.8 on e2fsck 1.42.3 too so
> not entirely convinced that the aforementioned patch is applicable.
>
> My main question is around why this issue seems to occur when the MS
> access DB being open (over Samba) on client workstations when the
> server is reloaded. I would possibly expect DB corruption due to this
> but not FS corruption.
>
> Many Thanks
> Stephen Elliott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Dilger [mailto:adilger@dilger.ca]
> Sent: 19 November 2013 16:47
> To: Stephen Elliott
> Cc: Zheng Liu; David Jeffery; <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>; Bernd
> Schubert; Eric Whitney
> Subject: Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
>
> As previously written in earlier comments, the bug is likely in the
> ext4 code of your appliance, and could possibly be fixed by the patch
> that was pointed our at that time.
>
> If you ask for help, you actually need to read the replies that are given.
>
> Cheers, Andreas
>
> On 2013-11-19, at 5:44, "Stephen Elliott" <techweb@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> Did you have any further feedback on this? It is purely curiosity for me:
>>
>> I have theorised that the problem comes from the MS access DB being
>> open (over Samba) on client workstations when the server is reloaded.
>>
>> Since ensuring these are closed prior to reloading, I have not seen
>> further FSCK errors on reload. Is there an explanation for this? I
>> can see why this may corrupt DB but not the filesystem.
>>
>> Many Thanks
>> Stephen Elliott
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
>> Sent: 28 October 2013 21:18
>> To: 'Andreas Dilger'
>> Cc: 'Zheng Liu'; 'David Jeffery'; 'linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List';
>> 'Bernd Schubert'; 'Eric Whitney'
>> Subject: RE: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
>>
>> Ultimately I am not too worried about this problem (now I know the
>> cause) but I am intrigued to know what actually caused the issue in
>> the first place. As you can see there is some history around the problem.
>>
>> Also was that defect / bug actually confirmed?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andreas Dilger [mailto:adilger@dilger.ca]
>> Sent: 28 October 2013 20:54
>> To: Stephen Elliott
>> Cc: Zheng Liu; David Jeffery; linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List; Bernd
>> Schubert; Eric Whitney
>> Subject: Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
>>
>> On Oct 28, 2013, at 3:00 AM, Stephen Elliott <techweb@ntlworld.com>
wrote:
>>> Thanks for the reply guys...
>>>
>>> The device in question is a ReadyNAS Pro 6, which happens to be
>>> running
>> Linux :) I actually saw some issues with e2fsck 1.42.3 earlier this year:
>>
>> So it looks like your next course of action is to contact ReadyNAS to
>> see if they have the patch that Zheng mentioned below in their kernel.
>>
>> Cheers, Andreas
>>
>>> ***** File system check forced at Fri Apr 26 20:08:38 WEST 2013
>>> ***** fsck 1.41.14 (22-Dec-2010) e2fsck 1.42.3 (14-May-2012) Pass 1:
>>> Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, i_blocks is
>>> 3135728, should be 3135904. Fix? yes
>>>
>>> Running additional passes to resolve blocks claimed by more than one
>> inode...
>>> Pass 1B: Rescanning for multiply-claimed blocks Multiply-claimed
>>> block(s) in inode 4195619: 167904376 167904377 167904378 167904379
>>> 167904380 167904381 167904382 167904383 167904384 167904385
>>> 167904386
>>> 167949296 167949297 167949298 167949299 167949300 167949301
>>> 167949302
>>> 167949303 167949304 167949305 167949306 Pass 1C: Scanning
>>> directories for inodes with multiply-claimed blocks Pass 1D:
>>> Reconciling multiply-claimed blocks (There are 1 inodes containing
>>> multiply-claimed blocks.)
>>>
>>> File /PREMIER/Premier Automation Purchase OrdersApp V18.5.mdb (inode
>>> #4195619, mod time Fri Apr 26 20:07:42 2013) has 22 multiply-claimed
>> block(s), shared with 0 file(s):
>>> Multiply-claimed blocks already reassigned or cloned.
>>>
>>> Pass 2: Checking directory structure Pass 3: Checking directory
>>> connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference counts Pass 5: Checking
>>> group summary information
>>>
>>> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
>>> /dev/c/c: 615898/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous),
>>> 62353456/483393536 blocks
>>>
>>> After deleting the file (MS Access DB, and re-creating from backup,
>>> the file system got mounted read only and the following errors were
>>> logged:]
>>>
>>> May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
>>> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904376:freeing already freed
>>> block
>> (bit 1144 May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: Aborting journal on device
> dm-0-8.
>>> May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs (dm-0: Remounting filesystem
>>> read-only May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
>>> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904377:freeing already freed
>>> block (bit 1145 May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device
>>> dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904378:freeing already
>>> freed block (bit 1146 May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error
>>> (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904379:freeing
>>> already freed block (bit 1147 May 8 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs
>>> error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block
>>> 167904380:freeing already freed block (bit 1148 May 8 14:58:15
>>> despair
>>> kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group
>>> 5124block 167904381:freeing already freed block (bit 1149 May 8
>>> 14:58:15 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
>>> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904382:freeing already freed
>>> block (bit 1150 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device
>>> dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904383:freeing already
>>> freed block (bit 1151 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error
>>> (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block 167904384:freeing
>>> already freed block (bit 1152 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs
>>> error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5124block
>>> 167904385:freeing already freed block (bit 1153 May 8 14:58:16
>>> despair
>>> kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group
>>> 5124block 167904386:freeing already freed block (bit 1154 May 8
>>> 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
>>> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949296:freeing already freed
>>> block (bit 13296 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error
>>> (device
>>> dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949297:freeing already
>>> freed block (bit 13297 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error
>>> (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949298:freeing
>>> already freed block (bit 13298 May 8 14:58:16 despair kernel:
>>> EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block
>>> 167949299:freeing already freed block (bit 13299 May 8 14:58:17
>>> despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411:
>>> group 5125block 167949300:freeing already freed block (bit 13300 May
>>> 8
>>> 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
>>> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949301:freeing already freed
>>> block (bit 13301 May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error
>>> (device
>>> dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949302:freeing already
>>> freed block (bit 13302 May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error
>>> (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949303:freeing
>>> already freed block (bit 13303 May 8 14:58:17 despair kernel:
>>> EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block
>>> 167949304:freeing already freed block (bit 13304 May 8 14:58:17
>>> despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0: mb_free_blocks:1411:
>>> group 5125block 167949305:freeing already freed block (bit 13305 May
>>> 8
>>> 14:58:17 despair kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0:
>>> mb_free_blocks:1411: group 5125block 167949306:freeing already freed
>>> block (bit 13306
>>>
>>>
>>> These are the same blocks slated as multiply claimed
>>>
>>> And then running an FSCK, we got the following:
>>>
>>> ***** File system check forced at Wed May 8 15:16:50 WEST 2013 *****
>>> fsck 1.41.14 (22-Dec-2010 e2fsck 1.42.3 (14-May-2012
>>> /dev/c/c: recovering journal
>>> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Pass 2: Checking
>>> directory
>> structure Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking
>> reference counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information Free
>> blocks count wrong for group #5124 (28170, counted=28159.
>>> Fix? yes
>>>
>>> Free blocks count wrong for group #5125 (25861, counted=25850.
>>> Fix? yes
>>>
>>> Free blocks count wrong (420683133, counted=420644972.
>>> Fix? yes
>>>
>>> Free inodes count wrong (29595347, counted=29595271.
>>> Fix? yes
>>>
>>>
>>> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
>>> /dev/c/c: 616825/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous,
>>> 62748564/483393536 blocks
>>>
>>> Then later in the year I reloaded the server with the database open
>>> from several client machines
>>>
>>> ***** File system check forced at Tue Jul 23 21:02:13 WEST 2013
>>> ***** fsck
>> 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) e2fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) Pass 1: Checking
>> inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, end of extent exceeds
>> allowed value
>>> (logical block 64907, physical block 11435403, len 16)
>>> Clear? yes
>>>
>>> Inode 4195619, i_blocks is 1337216, should be 1337176. Fix? yes
>>>
>>> Pass 2: Checking directory structure Pass 3: Checking directory
>>> connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference counts Pass 5: Checking
>>> group summary information Block bitmap
>>> differences: -(11435403--11435407) Fix? yes
>>>
>>> Free blocks count wrong for group #348 (2130, counted=2135).
>>> Fix? yes
>>>
>>> Free blocks count wrong (417470107, counted=417470112).
>>> Fix? yes
>>>
>>>
>>> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
>>> /dev/c/c: 625785/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous),
>>> 65923424/483393536 blocks
>>>
>>> Again related to the same file, which is only an MS Access DB open
>>> from
>> several client machines over SMB when the server is rebooted. Moving
>> forward I ensure all instances are closed when reloading but even so
>> I am surprised that a clean reload causes corruption at the
>> filesystem
> level.
>>>
>>> Since ensuring the DB is closed before reload, I have seen no
>>> further
>> issues like this.
>>>
>>> Many Thanks
>>> Stephen Elliott
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Zheng Liu [mailto:gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: 28 October 2013 06:39
>>> To: Andreas Dilger
>>> Cc: Stephen Elliott; David Jeffery; linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List;
>>> Bernd Schubert; Eric Whitney
>>> Subject: Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
>>>
>>> [Cc Eric Whitney to confirm this problem]
>>>
>>> Hi Andreas,
>>>
>>> If I remember correctly, this patch might can fix this problem [1].
>>>
>>> 1. http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg39485.html
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> - Zheng
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:13:26AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>>>> The error reported here is a relatively new one. It only appeared
>>>> in e2fsck 1.42.8, and wasn t in the code that I m using locally
>>>> (1.42.7) so I wasn t sure what it actually meant without looking at it.
>>>>
>>>> It looks like some kind of overflow of the extent tree, which
>>>> causes e2fsck to chop off the last 5 disk blocks (40 sectors),
>>>> though I m not sure exactly why. From your comments, this can be
>>>> reproduced with your database usage? Does it use fallocate() or
>>>> any other strange IO operations that might be causing this?
>>>>
>>>> Have you tried updating your kernel? If there is repeated
>>>> corruption appearing in the filesystem, then it is either a bug in
>>>> the kernel or in e2fsck. Not really sure which one to blame at
>>>> this
> point.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers, Andreas
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 18, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Stephen Elliott <techweb@ntlworld.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Any feedback on this guys??? Would really appreciate somebody
>>>>> taking a
>> look over this.
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
>>>>> Sent: 22 September 2013 20:13
>>>>> To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org;
>>>>> Andreas
>> Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
>>>>> Subject: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have theorised that the problem comes from the MS access DB
>>>>> being open
>> (over Samba) on client workstations when the server is reloaded.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since ensuring these are closed prior to reloading, I have not
>>>>> seen
>> further FSCK errors on reload. Is there an explanation for this? I
>> can see why this may corrupt DB but not the filesystem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just as a primer, I used a ReadyNAS NV+ for many years which was
>>>>> running
>> ext3 and never had this issue. However, since using ext4 on a
>> ReadyNAS Pro, I now see this issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> Many Thanks
>>>>> Stephen Elliott
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
>>>>> Sent: 23 July 2013 22:02
>>>>> To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org;
>>>>> Andreas
>> Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
>>>>> Subject: RE: FSCK Errors on ext4
>>>>>
>>>>> If it helps guys, the same file as before is causing the issue
>>>>> with
>> inode 4195610, a very large MS access DB.
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com]
>>>>> Sent: 23 July 2013 21:52
>>>>> To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org;
>>>>> Andreas
>> Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
>>>>> Subject: FSCK Errors on ext4
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Andreas / Bernd / all,
>>>>>
>>>>> You may recall advising me on another batch of FSCK errors a few
>>>>> months
>> back.
>>>>>
>>>>> The same device on an ext4 file system has produced the following
>>>>> errors
>> after a clean reload. It seems to be fine now but wanted your input
>> on
> this.
>> No bad blocks are reported on the devices etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> ***** File system check forced at Tue Jul 23 21:02:13 WEST 2013
>>>>> *****
>> fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) e2fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) Pass 1:
>> Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, end of extent
>> exceeds allowed value
>>>>> (logical block 64907, physical block 11435403, len
>>>>> 16) Clear? yes
>>>>>
>>>>> Inode 4195619, i_blocks is 1337216, should be 1337176. Fix? yes
>>>>>
>>>>> Pass 2: Checking directory structure Pass 3: Checking directory
>>>>> connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference counts Pass 5: Checking
>>>>> group summary information Block bitmap differences:
>>>>> -(11435403--11435407) Fix? yes
>>>>>
>>>>> Free blocks count wrong for group #348 (2130, counted=2135).
>>>>> Fix? yes
>>>>>
>>>>> Free blocks count wrong (417470107, counted=417470112).
>>>>> Fix? yes
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
>>>>> /dev/c/c: 625785/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous),
>>>>> 65923424/483393536 blocks
>>>>>
>>>>> Many Thanks
>>>>> Stephen Elliott
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers, Andreas
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4"
>>>> in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More
>>>> majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>>
>> Cheers, Andreas
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
[not found] ` <002e01cee56f$46f8e3d0$d4eaab70$@ntlworld.com>
@ 2013-11-20 12:35 ` Bernd Schubert
2013-11-20 12:46 ` Stephen Elliott
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Bernd Schubert @ 2013-11-20 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Elliott, 'Andreas Dilger'
Cc: 'Zheng Liu', 'David Jeffery',
linux-ext4, 'Eric Whitney'
Hello Stephen,
can you reproduce this on a fresh filesystem and on a system that you
can easily update? If you can, can you update the kernel to a
stable/recent version (i.e. longterm 3.10) and e2fsprogs to a current
version, re-create a fresh file system and try to reproduce again? If
you still can, can you try to figure out which order of syscalls is
causing the corruption? Or anything else that might help to figure out
the root cause?
In general, using a rather old kernel and user space tools and pointing
to an issue isn't going to help you much.
Cheers,
Bernd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* RE: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
2013-11-20 12:35 ` Bernd Schubert
@ 2013-11-20 12:46 ` Stephen Elliott
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Elliott @ 2013-11-20 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Bernd Schubert', 'Andreas Dilger'
Cc: 'Zheng Liu', 'David Jeffery',
linux-ext4, 'Eric Whitney'
Hi Bernd,
Appreciate the follow up... My issue with the ReadyNAS appliance is I don't have control of what releases etc they use.
At some point in the future, if I have a system where I can carry out this testing then I will. However, from my side this really isn't a problem, now I know about it. I came to this forum out of curiosity and wanting to ensure that there isn't a whole in the Linux Kernel / e2fsprogs which you guys would be passionate about fixing.
>From a developers perspective I imagine a simple attempt to reproduce this would be fairly simplistic and would probably be no more than an evening's work. Basically having multiple connections to a substantial MS Access DB from clients over SMB and then reloading the server. Although agree there is little point in fixing an old Kernel.
I guess we can close this discussion point now.
Many Thanks
Stephen Elliott
-----Original Message-----
From: Bernd Schubert [mailto:bernd.schubert@itwm.fraunhofer.de]
Sent: 20 November 2013 12:35
To: Stephen Elliott; 'Andreas Dilger'
Cc: 'Zheng Liu'; 'David Jeffery'; linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; 'Eric Whitney'
Subject: Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
Hello Stephen,
can you reproduce this on a fresh filesystem and on a system that you can easily update? If you can, can you update the kernel to a stable/recent version (i.e. longterm 3.10) and e2fsprogs to a current version, re-create a fresh file system and try to reproduce again? If you still can, can you try to figure out which order of syscalls is causing the corruption? Or anything else that might help to figure out the root cause?
In general, using a rather old kernel and user space tools and pointing to an issue isn't going to help you much.
Cheers,
Bernd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-11-20 12:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <008701cecc19$14734370$3d59ca50$@ntlworld.com>
2013-10-28 6:13 ` Query FSCK Errors on ext4 Andreas Dilger
2013-10-28 6:39 ` Zheng Liu
2013-10-28 9:00 ` Stephen Elliott
2013-10-28 20:53 ` Andreas Dilger
2013-10-28 21:18 ` Stephen Elliott
2013-11-19 12:44 ` Stephen Elliott
2013-11-19 16:46 ` Andreas Dilger
2013-11-19 17:35 ` Stephen Elliott
2013-11-19 20:27 ` Andreas Dilger
2013-11-19 20:48 ` Stephen Elliott
[not found] ` <C8263588-E5AD-4C23-81E3-5852DE3B1FC5@dilger.ca>
[not found] ` <002e01cee56f$46f8e3d0$d4eaab70$@ntlworld.com>
2013-11-20 12:35 ` Bernd Schubert
2013-11-20 12:46 ` Stephen Elliott
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.