From: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
"ak@linux.intel.com" <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf: need to expose sched_clock to correlate user samples with kernel samples
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 17:05:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1364918752.3019.20.camel@hornet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364889256.16858.1.camel@laptop>
On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 08:54 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 11:29 -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> > I'm still not sold on the CLOCK_PERF posix clock. The semantics are
> > still too hand-wavy and implementation specific.
>
> How about we define the semantics as: match whatever comes out of perf
> (and preferably ftrace by default) stuff?
My thought exactly. Maybe if we defined it as "CLOCK_TRACE" and had
equivalent "trace_clock()" function used by both perf (instead of
perf_clock()) and ftrace the semantics would became clearer? This clock
could be then described as "source of timestamps used by Linux trace
infrastructure, in particular by ftrace and perf".
Paweł
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-02 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-16 10:13 [RFC] perf: need to expose sched_clock to correlate user samples with kernel samples Stephane Eranian
2012-10-16 17:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-18 19:33 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-11-10 2:04 ` John Stultz
2012-11-11 20:32 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-11-12 18:53 ` John Stultz
2012-11-12 20:54 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-11-12 22:39 ` John Stultz
2012-11-13 20:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-11-14 22:26 ` John Stultz
2012-11-14 23:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-02-01 14:18 ` Pawel Moll
2013-02-05 21:18 ` David Ahern
2013-02-05 22:13 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-02-05 22:28 ` John Stultz
2013-02-06 1:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-02-06 18:17 ` Pawel Moll
2013-02-13 20:00 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-02-14 10:33 ` Pawel Moll
2013-02-18 15:16 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-02-18 18:59 ` David Ahern
2013-02-18 20:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-19 18:25 ` John Stultz
2013-02-19 19:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-19 20:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-19 20:35 ` John Stultz
2013-02-19 21:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-19 22:20 ` John Stultz
2013-02-20 10:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-20 10:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-23 6:04 ` John Stultz
2013-02-25 14:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-14 15:34 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-03-14 19:57 ` Pawel Moll
2013-03-31 16:23 ` David Ahern
2013-04-01 18:29 ` John Stultz
2013-04-01 22:29 ` David Ahern
2013-04-01 23:12 ` John Stultz
2013-04-03 9:17 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-04-03 13:55 ` David Ahern
2013-04-03 14:00 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-04-03 14:14 ` David Ahern
2013-04-03 14:22 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-04-03 17:57 ` John Stultz
2013-04-04 8:12 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-04-04 22:26 ` John Stultz
2013-04-02 7:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-02 16:05 ` Pawel Moll [this message]
2013-04-02 16:19 ` John Stultz
2013-04-02 16:34 ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-03 17:19 ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-03 17:29 ` John Stultz
2013-04-03 17:35 ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-03 17:50 ` John Stultz
2013-04-04 7:37 ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-04 16:33 ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-04 16:29 ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-05 18:16 ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-06 11:05 ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-08 17:58 ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-08 19:05 ` John Stultz
2013-04-09 5:02 ` Richard Cochran
2013-02-06 18:17 ` Pawel Moll
2013-06-26 16:49 ` David Ahern
2013-07-15 10:44 ` Pawel Moll
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1364918752.3019.20.camel@hornet \
--to=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=penberg@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.