All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/6] arm: ls1021a: merge SoC specific code in a separate file
@ 2015-11-24 10:45 Yuan Yao
  2015-11-24 10:45 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/6] arm: ls102xa: enable all the snoop signal for masters Yuan Yao
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Yuan Yao @ 2015-11-24 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Create a soc.c file to put the code for soc special settings.

Signed-off-by: Yuan Yao <yao.yuan@freescale.com>
---
 arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/Makefile             |  1 +
 arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c                | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/ls102xa_soc.h | 12 +++++
 board/freescale/ls1021aqds/ls1021aqds.c         | 49 +-----------------
 board/freescale/ls1021atwr/ls1021atwr.c         | 42 +---------------
 5 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/ls102xa_soc.h

diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/Makefile b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/Makefile
index 2311468..0228300 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/Makefile
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ obj-y	+= cpu.o
 obj-y	+= clock.o
 obj-y	+= timer.o
 obj-y	+= fsl_epu.o
+obj-y	+= soc.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_AHCI_PLAT) += ls102xa_sata.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += fdt.o
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0fdd6d4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright 2015 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
+ *
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier:	GPL-2.0+
+ */
+
+#include <common.h>
+#include <asm/arch/clock.h>
+#include <asm/io.h>
+#include <asm/arch/immap_ls102xa.h>
+#include <asm/arch/ls102xa_soc.h>
+
+unsigned int get_soc_major_rev(void)
+{
+	struct ccsr_gur __iomem *gur = (void *)(CONFIG_SYS_FSL_GUTS_ADDR);
+	unsigned int svr, major;
+
+	svr = in_be32(&gur->svr);
+	major = SVR_MAJ(svr);
+
+	return major;
+}
+
+int arch_soc_init(void)
+{
+	struct ccsr_scfg *scfg = (struct ccsr_scfg *)CONFIG_SYS_FSL_SCFG_ADDR;
+	struct ccsr_cci400 *cci = (struct ccsr_cci400 *)CONFIG_SYS_CCI400_ADDR;
+	unsigned int major;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_QSPI
+	out_be32(&scfg->qspi_cfg, SCFG_QSPI_CLKSEL);
+#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_DCU_FB
+	out_be32(&scfg->pixclkcr, SCFG_PIXCLKCR_PXCKEN);
+#endif
+
+	/* Configure Little endian for SAI, ASRC and SPDIF */
+	out_be32(&scfg->endiancr, SCFG_ENDIANCR_LE);
+
+	/*
+	 * Enable snoop requests and DVM message requests for
+	 * Slave insterface S4 (A7 core cluster)
+	 */
+	out_le32(&cci->slave[4].snoop_ctrl,
+		 CCI400_DVM_MESSAGE_REQ_EN | CCI400_SNOOP_REQ_EN);
+
+	major = get_soc_major_rev();
+	if (major == SOC_MAJOR_VER_1_0) {
+		/*
+		 * Set CCI-400 Slave interface S1, S2 Shareable Override
+		 * Register All transactions are treated as non-shareable
+		 */
+		out_le32(&cci->slave[1].sha_ord, CCI400_SHAORD_NON_SHAREABLE);
+		out_le32(&cci->slave[2].sha_ord, CCI400_SHAORD_NON_SHAREABLE);
+
+		/* Workaround for the issue that DDR could not respond to
+		 * barrier transaction which is generated by executing DSB/ISB
+		 * instruction. Set CCI-400 control override register to
+		 * terminate the barrier transaction. After DDR is initialized,
+		 * allow barrier transaction to DDR again */
+		out_le32(&cci->ctrl_ord, CCI400_CTRLORD_TERM_BARRIER);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/ls102xa_soc.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/ls102xa_soc.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f10cb91
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/ls102xa_soc.h
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright 2015 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
+ *
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier:	GPL-2.0+
+ */
+
+#ifndef __FSL_LS102XA_SOC_H
+#define __FSL_LS102XA_SOC_H
+
+unsigned int get_soc_major_rev(void);
+int arch_soc_init(void);
+#endif /* __FSL_LS102XA_SOC_H */
diff --git a/board/freescale/ls1021aqds/ls1021aqds.c b/board/freescale/ls1021aqds/ls1021aqds.c
index d889ad5..be3358a 100644
--- a/board/freescale/ls1021aqds/ls1021aqds.c
+++ b/board/freescale/ls1021aqds/ls1021aqds.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 #include <asm/arch/clock.h>
 #include <asm/arch/fsl_serdes.h>
 #include <asm/arch/ls102xa_stream_id.h>
+#include <asm/arch/ls102xa_soc.h>
 #include <asm/arch/ls102xa_devdis.h>
 #include <asm/arch/ls102xa_sata.h>
 #include <hwconfig.h>
@@ -140,17 +141,6 @@ unsigned long get_board_ddr_clk(void)
 	return 66666666;
 }
 
-unsigned int get_soc_major_rev(void)
-{
-	struct ccsr_gur __iomem *gur = (void *)(CONFIG_SYS_FSL_GUTS_ADDR);
-	unsigned int svr, major;
-
-	svr = in_be32(&gur->svr);
-	major = SVR_MAJ(svr);
-
-	return major;
-}
-
 int select_i2c_ch_pca9547(u8 ch)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -193,8 +183,6 @@ int board_mmc_init(bd_t *bis)
 int board_early_init_f(void)
 {
 	struct ccsr_scfg *scfg = (struct ccsr_scfg *)CONFIG_SYS_FSL_SCFG_ADDR;
-	struct ccsr_cci400 *cci = (struct ccsr_cci400 *)CONFIG_SYS_CCI400_ADDR;
-	unsigned int major;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_TSEC_ENET
 	/* clear BD & FR bits for BE BD's and frame data */
@@ -205,40 +193,7 @@ int board_early_init_f(void)
 	init_early_memctl_regs();
 #endif
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_QSPI
-	out_be32(&scfg->qspi_cfg, SCFG_QSPI_CLKSEL);
-#endif
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_DCU_FB
-	out_be32(&scfg->pixclkcr, SCFG_PIXCLKCR_PXCKEN);
-#endif
-
-	/* Configure Little endian for SAI, ASRC and SPDIF */
-	out_be32(&scfg->endiancr, SCFG_ENDIANCR_LE);
-
-	/*
-	 * Enable snoop requests and DVM message requests for
-	 * Slave insterface S4 (A7 core cluster)
-	 */
-	out_le32(&cci->slave[4].snoop_ctrl,
-		 CCI400_DVM_MESSAGE_REQ_EN | CCI400_SNOOP_REQ_EN);
-
-	major = get_soc_major_rev();
-	if (major == SOC_MAJOR_VER_1_0) {
-		/*
-		 * Set CCI-400 Slave interface S1, S2 Shareable Override
-		 * Register All transactions are treated as non-shareable
-		 */
-		out_le32(&cci->slave[1].sha_ord, CCI400_SHAORD_NON_SHAREABLE);
-		out_le32(&cci->slave[2].sha_ord, CCI400_SHAORD_NON_SHAREABLE);
-
-		/* Workaround for the issue that DDR could not respond to
-		 * barrier transaction which is generated by executing DSB/ISB
-		 * instruction. Set CCI-400 control override register to
-		 * terminate the barrier transaction. After DDR is initialized,
-		 * allow barrier transaction to DDR again */
-		out_le32(&cci->ctrl_ord, CCI400_CTRLORD_TERM_BARRIER);
-	}
+	arch_soc_init();
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_DEEP_SLEEP)
 	if (is_warm_boot())
diff --git a/board/freescale/ls1021atwr/ls1021atwr.c b/board/freescale/ls1021atwr/ls1021atwr.c
index 4918c11..8eaff5f 100644
--- a/board/freescale/ls1021atwr/ls1021atwr.c
+++ b/board/freescale/ls1021atwr/ls1021atwr.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include <asm/arch/fsl_serdes.h>
 #include <asm/arch/ls102xa_stream_id.h>
 #include <asm/arch/ls102xa_devdis.h>
+#include <asm/arch/ls102xa_soc.h>
 #include <asm/arch/ls102xa_sata.h>
 #include <hwconfig.h>
 #include <mmc.h>
@@ -138,17 +139,6 @@ int checkboard(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-unsigned int get_soc_major_rev(void)
-{
-	struct ccsr_gur __iomem *gur = (void *)(CONFIG_SYS_FSL_GUTS_ADDR);
-	unsigned int svr, major;
-
-	svr = in_be32(&gur->svr);
-	major = SVR_MAJ(svr);
-
-	return major;
-}
-
 void ddrmc_init(void)
 {
 	struct ccsr_ddr *ddr = (struct ccsr_ddr *)CONFIG_SYS_FSL_DDR_ADDR;
@@ -394,8 +384,6 @@ conflict:
 int board_early_init_f(void)
 {
 	struct ccsr_scfg *scfg = (struct ccsr_scfg *)CONFIG_SYS_FSL_SCFG_ADDR;
-	struct ccsr_cci400 *cci = (struct ccsr_cci400 *)CONFIG_SYS_CCI400_ADDR;
-	unsigned int major;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_TSEC_ENET
 	/* clear BD & FR bits for BE BD's and frame data */
@@ -407,33 +395,7 @@ int board_early_init_f(void)
 	init_early_memctl_regs();
 #endif
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_DCU_FB
-	out_be32(&scfg->pixclkcr, SCFG_PIXCLKCR_PXCKEN);
-#endif
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_QSPI
-	out_be32(&scfg->qspi_cfg, SCFG_QSPI_CLKSEL);
-#endif
-
-	/* Configure Little endian for SAI, ASRC and SPDIF */
-	out_be32(&scfg->endiancr, SCFG_ENDIANCR_LE);
-
-	/*
-	 * Enable snoop requests and DVM message requests for
-	 * Slave insterface S4 (A7 core cluster)
-	 */
-	out_le32(&cci->slave[4].snoop_ctrl,
-		 CCI400_DVM_MESSAGE_REQ_EN | CCI400_SNOOP_REQ_EN);
-
-	major = get_soc_major_rev();
-	if (major == SOC_MAJOR_VER_1_0) {
-		/*
-		 * Set CCI-400 Slave interface S1, S2 Shareable Override
-		 * Register All transactions are treated as non-shareable
-		 */
-		out_le32(&cci->slave[1].sha_ord, CCI400_SHAORD_NON_SHAREABLE);
-		out_le32(&cci->slave[2].sha_ord, CCI400_SHAORD_NON_SHAREABLE);
-	}
+	arch_soc_init();
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_DEEP_SLEEP)
 	if (is_warm_boot()) {
-- 
2.1.0.27.g96db324

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/6] arm: ls102xa: enable all the snoop signal for masters.
  2015-11-24 10:45 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/6] arm: ls1021a: merge SoC specific code in a separate file Yuan Yao
@ 2015-11-24 10:45 ` Yuan Yao
  2015-11-24 10:45 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/6] ls102xa: Enable snoop and DVM message requests Yuan Yao
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Yuan Yao @ 2015-11-24 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Enable the IP feature's snoop signal to support
hardware snoop for cache coherence.

SNPCNFGCR contains the bits to drive snoop signal
for various masters.

Signed-off-by: Yuan Yao <yao.yuan@freescale.com>
---
 arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c                  | 8 ++++++++
 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/immap_ls102xa.h | 6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c
index 0fdd6d4..6036473 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c
@@ -62,5 +62,13 @@ int arch_soc_init(void)
 		out_le32(&cci->ctrl_ord, CCI400_CTRLORD_TERM_BARRIER);
 	}
 
+	/* Enable all the snoop signal for various masters */
+	out_be32(&scfg->snpcnfgcr, SCFG_SNPCNFGCR_SEC_RD_WR |
+				SCFG_SNPCNFGCR_DCU_RD_WR |
+				SCFG_SNPCNFGCR_SATA_RD_WR |
+				SCFG_SNPCNFGCR_USB3_RD_WR |
+				SCFG_SNPCNFGCR_DBG_RD_WR |
+				SCFG_SNPCNFGCR_EDMA_SNP);
+
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/immap_ls102xa.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/immap_ls102xa.h
index 1bcdf04..0527576 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/immap_ls102xa.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/immap_ls102xa.h
@@ -150,6 +150,12 @@ struct ccsr_gur {
 #define SCFG_ETSECCMCR_GE1_CLK125	0x08000000
 #define SCFG_PIXCLKCR_PXCKEN		0x80000000
 #define SCFG_QSPI_CLKSEL		0xc0100000
+#define SCFG_SNPCNFGCR_SEC_RD_WR	0xc0000000
+#define SCFG_SNPCNFGCR_DCU_RD_WR	0x03000000
+#define SCFG_SNPCNFGCR_SATA_RD_WR	0x00c00000
+#define SCFG_SNPCNFGCR_USB3_RD_WR	0x00300000
+#define SCFG_SNPCNFGCR_DBG_RD_WR	0x000c0000
+#define SCFG_SNPCNFGCR_EDMA_SNP		0x00020000
 #define SCFG_ENDIANCR_LE		0x80000000
 
 /* Supplemental Configuration Unit */
-- 
2.1.0.27.g96db324

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/6] ls102xa: Enable snoop and DVM message requests.
  2015-11-24 10:45 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/6] arm: ls1021a: merge SoC specific code in a separate file Yuan Yao
  2015-11-24 10:45 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/6] arm: ls102xa: enable all the snoop signal for masters Yuan Yao
@ 2015-11-24 10:45 ` Yuan Yao
  2015-11-24 10:45 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/6] armv7/fsl-ls102xa: Workaround for DDR erratum A008514 Yuan Yao
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Yuan Yao @ 2015-11-24 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Signed-off-by: Yuan Yao <yao.yuan@freescale.com>
---
 arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c
index 6036473..97ba6d5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c
@@ -40,8 +40,14 @@ int arch_soc_init(void)
 
 	/*
 	 * Enable snoop requests and DVM message requests for
-	 * Slave insterface S4 (A7 core cluster)
+	 * All the slave insterfaces.
 	 */
+	out_le32(&cci->slave[0].snoop_ctrl,
+		 CCI400_DVM_MESSAGE_REQ_EN | CCI400_SNOOP_REQ_EN);
+	out_le32(&cci->slave[1].snoop_ctrl,
+		 CCI400_DVM_MESSAGE_REQ_EN | CCI400_SNOOP_REQ_EN);
+	out_le32(&cci->slave[2].snoop_ctrl,
+		 CCI400_DVM_MESSAGE_REQ_EN | CCI400_SNOOP_REQ_EN);
 	out_le32(&cci->slave[4].snoop_ctrl,
 		 CCI400_DVM_MESSAGE_REQ_EN | CCI400_SNOOP_REQ_EN);
 
-- 
2.1.0.27.g96db324

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/6] armv7/fsl-ls102xa: Workaround for DDR erratum A008514
  2015-11-24 10:45 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/6] arm: ls1021a: merge SoC specific code in a separate file Yuan Yao
  2015-11-24 10:45 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/6] arm: ls102xa: enable all the snoop signal for masters Yuan Yao
  2015-11-24 10:45 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/6] ls102xa: Enable snoop and DVM message requests Yuan Yao
@ 2015-11-24 10:45 ` Yuan Yao
  2015-11-24 10:45 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/6] LS102XA:workaround:disable priorities within DDR Yuan Yao
  2015-11-24 10:45 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/6] move the erratum_a008336_a008514 from general ddr file to soc file Yuan Yao
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Yuan Yao @ 2015-11-24 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

This is a workaround for hardware erratum.
Write the value of 63b2_0002h to EDDRTQCFG will optimal the
memory controller performance.

The value: 63b2_0002h comes from the hardware team.

Signed-off-by: Yuan Yao <yao.yuan@freescale.com>
---
 arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c                  | 10 ++++++++++
 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/immap_ls102xa.h |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c
index 97ba6d5..b15cd60 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c
@@ -76,5 +76,15 @@ int arch_soc_init(void)
 				SCFG_SNPCNFGCR_DBG_RD_WR |
 				SCFG_SNPCNFGCR_EDMA_SNP);
 
+	/*
+	 * Memory controller require a register write before being enabled.
+	 * Affects: DDR
+	 * Register: EDDRTQCFG
+	 * Description: Memory controller performance is not optimal with
+	 *		default internal target queue register values.
+	 * Workaround: Write a value of 63b2_0002h to address: 157_020Ch.
+	 */
+	out_be32(&scfg->eddrtqcfg, 0x63b20002);
+
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/immap_ls102xa.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/immap_ls102xa.h
index 0527576..c584c9f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/immap_ls102xa.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/immap_ls102xa.h
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ struct ccsr_scfg {
 	u32 scfgrevcr;
 	u32 coresrencr;
 	u32 pex2pmrdsr;
-	u32 ddrc1cr;
+	u32 eddrtqcfg;
 	u32 ddrc2cr;
 	u32 ddrc3cr;
 	u32 ddrc4cr;
-- 
2.1.0.27.g96db324

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/6] LS102XA:workaround:disable priorities within DDR
  2015-11-24 10:45 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/6] arm: ls1021a: merge SoC specific code in a separate file Yuan Yao
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-11-24 10:45 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/6] armv7/fsl-ls102xa: Workaround for DDR erratum A008514 Yuan Yao
@ 2015-11-24 10:45 ` Yuan Yao
  2015-11-24 16:09   ` Sinan Akman
  2015-11-24 10:45 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/6] move the erratum_a008336_a008514 from general ddr file to soc file Yuan Yao
  4 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Yuan Yao @ 2015-11-24 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Erratum number: ERR008514
EDDRTQCFG Registers are Integration Strap values which controls
performance parameters for DDR Controller.

The bit 25 is used to disable priorities within DDR since DDR
are connected backwards on Rev2.0 silicon for LS1021A.

Signed-off-by: Yuan Yao <yao.yuan@freescale.com>
---
 arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c
index b15cd60..98d4acd 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ int arch_soc_init(void)
 {
 	struct ccsr_scfg *scfg = (struct ccsr_scfg *)CONFIG_SYS_FSL_SCFG_ADDR;
 	struct ccsr_cci400 *cci = (struct ccsr_cci400 *)CONFIG_SYS_CCI400_ADDR;
-	unsigned int major;
+	unsigned int major, reg;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_FSL_QSPI
 	out_be32(&scfg->qspi_cfg, SCFG_QSPI_CLKSEL);
@@ -86,5 +86,16 @@ int arch_soc_init(void)
 	 */
 	out_be32(&scfg->eddrtqcfg, 0x63b20002);
 
+	/*
+	 * EDDRTQCFG Registers are Integration Strap values which controls
+	 * performance parameters for DDR Controller.
+	 * The bit 25 is used for disable priorities within DDR.
+	 * This is a workaround because of the DDR are connected backwards
+	 * on Rev2.0.
+	 */
+	reg = in_be32(&scfg->eddrtqcfg);
+	reg |= 1 << 6;
+	out_be32(&scfg->eddrtqcfg, reg);
+
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.1.0.27.g96db324

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/6] move the erratum_a008336_a008514 from general ddr file to soc file
  2015-11-24 10:45 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/6] arm: ls1021a: merge SoC specific code in a separate file Yuan Yao
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-11-24 10:45 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/6] LS102XA:workaround:disable priorities within DDR Yuan Yao
@ 2015-11-24 10:45 ` Yuan Yao
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Yuan Yao @ 2015-11-24 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Both of the erratum:A008336 and A008514 are not apply to all the
soc like:LS1021A, LS1043A.
So it seems better to move those erratum codes form the general ddr
file to the private soc file.

Signed-off-by: Yuan Yao <yao.yuan@freescale.com>
---
 arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/soc.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/ddr/fsl/fsl_ddr_gen4.c          | 34 ------------------------------
 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/soc.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/soc.c
index 8896b70..738b113 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/soc.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/soc.c
@@ -14,6 +14,41 @@
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_LS2080A) || defined(CONFIG_LS2085A)
+/*
+ * This erratum requires setting a value to eddrtqcr1 to
+ * optimal the DDR performance.
+ */
+static void erratum_a008336(void)
+{
+	u32 *eddrtqcr1;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A008336
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_FSL_DCSR_DDR_ADDR
+	eddrtqcr1 = (void *)CONFIG_SYS_FSL_DCSR_DDR_ADDR + 0x800;
+	out_le32(eddrtqcr1, 0x63b30002);
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_FSL_DCSR_DDR2_ADDR
+	eddrtqcr1 = (void *)CONFIG_SYS_FSL_DCSR_DDR2_ADDR + 0x800;
+	out_le32(eddrtqcr1, 0x63b30002);
+#endif
+#endif
+}
+
+/*
+ * This erratum requires a register write before being Memory
+ * controller 3 being enabled.
+ */
+static void erratum_a008514(void)
+{
+	u32 *eddrtqcr1;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A008514
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_FSL_DCSR_DDR2_ADDR
+	eddrtqcr1 = (void *)CONFIG_SYS_FSL_DCSR_DDR3_ADDR + 0x800;
+	out_le32(eddrtqcr1, 0x63b20002);
+#endif
+#endif
+}
 #ifdef CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A009635
 #define PLATFORM_CYCLE_ENV_VAR	"a009635_interval_val"
 
@@ -118,6 +153,8 @@ void fsl_lsch3_early_init_f(void)
 	erratum_rcw_src();
 	init_early_memctl_regs();	/* tighten IFC timing */
 	erratum_a009203();
+	erratum_a008514();
+	erratum_a008336();
 }
 
 #elif defined(CONFIG_LS1043A)
diff --git a/drivers/ddr/fsl/fsl_ddr_gen4.c b/drivers/ddr/fsl/fsl_ddr_gen4.c
index 50f4671..d7cbf34 100644
--- a/drivers/ddr/fsl/fsl_ddr_gen4.c
+++ b/drivers/ddr/fsl/fsl_ddr_gen4.c
@@ -48,10 +48,6 @@ void fsl_ddr_set_memctl_regs(const fsl_ddr_cfg_regs_t *regs,
 	u32 temp_sdram_cfg;
 	u32 total_gb_size_per_controller;
 	int timeout;
-#if defined(CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A008336) || \
-	defined(CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A008514)
-	u32 *eddrtqcr1;
-#endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A008511
 	u32 temp32, mr6;
 	u32 vref_seq1[3] = {0x80, 0x96, 0x16};	/* for range 1 */
@@ -69,36 +65,20 @@ void fsl_ddr_set_memctl_regs(const fsl_ddr_cfg_regs_t *regs,
 	switch (ctrl_num) {
 	case 0:
 		ddr = (void *)CONFIG_SYS_FSL_DDR_ADDR;
-#if defined(CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A008336) || \
-	defined(CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A008514)
-		eddrtqcr1 = (void *)CONFIG_SYS_FSL_DCSR_DDR_ADDR + 0x800;
-#endif
 		break;
 #if defined(CONFIG_SYS_FSL_DDR2_ADDR) && (CONFIG_NUM_DDR_CONTROLLERS > 1)
 	case 1:
 		ddr = (void *)CONFIG_SYS_FSL_DDR2_ADDR;
-#if defined(CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A008336) || \
-	defined(CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A008514)
-		eddrtqcr1 = (void *)CONFIG_SYS_FSL_DCSR_DDR2_ADDR + 0x800;
-#endif
 		break;
 #endif
 #if defined(CONFIG_SYS_FSL_DDR3_ADDR) && (CONFIG_NUM_DDR_CONTROLLERS > 2)
 	case 2:
 		ddr = (void *)CONFIG_SYS_FSL_DDR3_ADDR;
-#if defined(CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A008336) || \
-	defined(CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A008514)
-		eddrtqcr1 = (void *)CONFIG_SYS_FSL_DCSR_DDR3_ADDR + 0x800;
-#endif
 		break;
 #endif
 #if defined(CONFIG_SYS_FSL_DDR4_ADDR) && (CONFIG_NUM_DDR_CONTROLLERS > 3)
 	case 3:
 		ddr = (void *)CONFIG_SYS_FSL_DDR4_ADDR;
-#if defined(CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A008336) || \
-	defined(CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A008514)
-		eddrtqcr1 = (void *)CONFIG_SYS_FSL_DCSR_DDR4_ADDR + 0x800;
-#endif
 		break;
 #endif
 	default:
@@ -109,20 +89,6 @@ void fsl_ddr_set_memctl_regs(const fsl_ddr_cfg_regs_t *regs,
 	if (step == 2)
 		goto step2;
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A008336
-#if defined(CONFIG_LS2080A) || defined(CONFIG_LS2085A)
-	/* A008336 only applies to general DDR controllers */
-	if ((ctrl_num == 0) || (ctrl_num == 1))
-#endif
-		ddr_out32(eddrtqcr1, 0x63b30002);
-#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A008514
-#if defined(CONFIG_LS2080A) || defined(CONFIG_LS2085A)
-	/* A008514 only applies to DP-DDR controler */
-	if (ctrl_num == 2)
-#endif
-		ddr_out32(eddrtqcr1, 0x63b20002);
-#endif
 	if (regs->ddr_eor)
 		ddr_out32(&ddr->eor, regs->ddr_eor);
 
-- 
2.1.0.27.g96db324

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/6] LS102XA:workaround:disable priorities within DDR
  2015-11-24 10:45 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/6] LS102XA:workaround:disable priorities within DDR Yuan Yao
@ 2015-11-24 16:09   ` Sinan Akman
  2015-11-25  9:14     ` Yao Yuan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Sinan Akman @ 2015-11-24 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot


   Hi Yuan

On 24/11/15 05:45 AM, Yuan Yao wrote:
> Erratum number: ERR008514
> EDDRTQCFG Registers are Integration Strap values which controls
> performance parameters for DDR Controller.
>
> The bit 25 is used to disable priorities within DDR since DDR
> are connected backwards on Rev2.0 silicon for LS1021A.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuan Yao <yao.yuan@freescale.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c
> index b15cd60..98d4acd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c
> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ int arch_soc_init(void)
>   {
>   	struct ccsr_scfg *scfg = (struct ccsr_scfg *)CONFIG_SYS_FSL_SCFG_ADDR;
>   	struct ccsr_cci400 *cci = (struct ccsr_cci400 *)CONFIG_SYS_CCI400_ADDR;
> -	unsigned int major;
> +	unsigned int major, reg;
>
>   #ifdef CONFIG_FSL_QSPI
>   	out_be32(&scfg->qspi_cfg, SCFG_QSPI_CLKSEL);
> @@ -86,5 +86,16 @@ int arch_soc_init(void)
>   	 */
>   	out_be32(&scfg->eddrtqcfg, 0x63b20002);
>
> +	/*
> +	 * EDDRTQCFG Registers are Integration Strap values which controls
> +	 * performance parameters for DDR Controller.
> +	 * The bit 25 is used for disable priorities within DDR.
> +	 * This is a workaround because of the DDR are connected backwards
> +	 * on Rev2.0.

   Would this cause any problem with Rev1.0 ?
If it does, should we check the revision here.

   Regards
   Sinan Akman

> +	 */
> +	reg = in_be32(&scfg->eddrtqcfg);
> +	reg |= 1 << 6;
> +	out_be32(&scfg->eddrtqcfg, reg);
> +
>   	return 0;
>   }
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/6] LS102XA:workaround:disable priorities within DDR
  2015-11-24 16:09   ` Sinan Akman
@ 2015-11-25  9:14     ` Yao Yuan
  2015-11-25 16:50       ` York Sun
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Yao Yuan @ 2015-11-25  9:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Hi Sinan Akman,

Thanks for your review.
There should not cause any problem with Rev1.0.
The workaround should also apply to rev1.0.

Best Regards,
Yuan Yao

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sinan Akman [mailto:sinan at writeme.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 12:10 AM
> To: Yuan Yao-B46683 <yao.yuan@freescale.com>; Sun York-R58495
> <yorksun@freescale.com>
> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; Wang Huan-B18965 <alison.wang@freescale.com>
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/6] LS102XA:workaround:disable priorities
> within DDR
> 
> 
>    Hi Yuan
> 
> On 24/11/15 05:45 AM, Yuan Yao wrote:
> > Erratum number: ERR008514
> > EDDRTQCFG Registers are Integration Strap values which controls
> > performance parameters for DDR Controller.
> >
> > The bit 25 is used to disable priorities within DDR since DDR are
> > connected backwards on Rev2.0 silicon for LS1021A.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yuan Yao <yao.yuan@freescale.com>
> > ---
> >   arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> >   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c
> > b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c
> > index b15cd60..98d4acd 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/soc.c
> > @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ int arch_soc_init(void)
> >   {
> >   	struct ccsr_scfg *scfg = (struct ccsr_scfg
> *)CONFIG_SYS_FSL_SCFG_ADDR;
> >   	struct ccsr_cci400 *cci = (struct ccsr_cci400
> *)CONFIG_SYS_CCI400_ADDR;
> > -	unsigned int major;
> > +	unsigned int major, reg;
> >
> >   #ifdef CONFIG_FSL_QSPI
> >   	out_be32(&scfg->qspi_cfg, SCFG_QSPI_CLKSEL); @@ -86,5 +86,16 @@
> int
> > arch_soc_init(void)
> >   	 */
> >   	out_be32(&scfg->eddrtqcfg, 0x63b20002);
> >
> > +	/*
> > +	 * EDDRTQCFG Registers are Integration Strap values which controls
> > +	 * performance parameters for DDR Controller.
> > +	 * The bit 25 is used for disable priorities within DDR.
> > +	 * This is a workaround because of the DDR are connected backwards
> > +	 * on Rev2.0.
> 
>    Would this cause any problem with Rev1.0 ?
> If it does, should we check the revision here.
> 
>    Regards
>    Sinan Akman
> 
> > +	 */
> > +	reg = in_be32(&scfg->eddrtqcfg);
> > +	reg |= 1 << 6;
> > +	out_be32(&scfg->eddrtqcfg, reg);
> > +
> >   	return 0;
> >   }
> >

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/6] LS102XA:workaround:disable priorities within DDR
  2015-11-25  9:14     ` Yao Yuan
@ 2015-11-25 16:50       ` York Sun
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: York Sun @ 2015-11-25 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Yuan,

On 11/25/2015 01:14 AM, Yuan Yao-B46683 wrote:
> Hi Sinan Akman,
> 
> Thanks for your review.
> There should not cause any problem with Rev1.0.
> The workaround should also apply to rev1.0.

Please squash your patch 4 & 5 and update your comment and commit message.
The erratum document changes from writing 0x63b20002 to 0x63b20042 for LS102x
rev 1.0 and rev 2.0.

York

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-11-25 16:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-11-24 10:45 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/6] arm: ls1021a: merge SoC specific code in a separate file Yuan Yao
2015-11-24 10:45 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/6] arm: ls102xa: enable all the snoop signal for masters Yuan Yao
2015-11-24 10:45 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/6] ls102xa: Enable snoop and DVM message requests Yuan Yao
2015-11-24 10:45 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/6] armv7/fsl-ls102xa: Workaround for DDR erratum A008514 Yuan Yao
2015-11-24 10:45 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/6] LS102XA:workaround:disable priorities within DDR Yuan Yao
2015-11-24 16:09   ` Sinan Akman
2015-11-25  9:14     ` Yao Yuan
2015-11-25 16:50       ` York Sun
2015-11-24 10:45 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/6] move the erratum_a008336_a008514 from general ddr file to soc file Yuan Yao

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.