All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
	James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>,
	Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/12] staging: lustre: ldlm: use list_first_entry in ldlm_lockd.c
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 14:15:54 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <151313495486.27582.12193540145417673665.stgit@noble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <151313493380.27582.16490205348451477393.stgit@noble>

This is only a small simplification, but it makes the code
a little clearer.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lockd.c |   10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lockd.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lockd.c
index ada50b69c5f6..5f6e7c933b81 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lockd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lockd.c
@@ -696,13 +696,13 @@ static int ldlm_bl_get_work(struct ldlm_bl_pool *blp,
 	/* process a request from the blp_list at least every blp_num_threads */
 	if (!list_empty(&blp->blp_list) &&
 	    (list_empty(&blp->blp_prio_list) || num_bl == 0))
-		blwi = list_entry(blp->blp_list.next,
-				  struct ldlm_bl_work_item, blwi_entry);
+		blwi = list_first_entry(&blp->blp_list,
+					struct ldlm_bl_work_item, blwi_entry);
 	else
 		if (!list_empty(&blp->blp_prio_list))
-			blwi = list_entry(blp->blp_prio_list.next,
-					  struct ldlm_bl_work_item,
-					  blwi_entry);
+			blwi = list_first_entry(&blp->blp_prio_list,
+						struct ldlm_bl_work_item,
+						blwi_entry);
 
 	if (blwi) {
 		if (++num_bl >= num_th)

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
	James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>,
	Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
Subject: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 03/12] staging: lustre: ldlm: use list_first_entry in ldlm_lockd.c
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 14:15:54 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <151313495486.27582.12193540145417673665.stgit@noble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <151313493380.27582.16490205348451477393.stgit@noble>

This is only a small simplification, but it makes the code
a little clearer.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lockd.c |   10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lockd.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lockd.c
index ada50b69c5f6..5f6e7c933b81 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lockd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lockd.c
@@ -696,13 +696,13 @@ static int ldlm_bl_get_work(struct ldlm_bl_pool *blp,
 	/* process a request from the blp_list at least every blp_num_threads */
 	if (!list_empty(&blp->blp_list) &&
 	    (list_empty(&blp->blp_prio_list) || num_bl == 0))
-		blwi = list_entry(blp->blp_list.next,
-				  struct ldlm_bl_work_item, blwi_entry);
+		blwi = list_first_entry(&blp->blp_list,
+					struct ldlm_bl_work_item, blwi_entry);
 	else
 		if (!list_empty(&blp->blp_prio_list))
-			blwi = list_entry(blp->blp_prio_list.next,
-					  struct ldlm_bl_work_item,
-					  blwi_entry);
+			blwi = list_first_entry(&blp->blp_prio_list,
+						struct ldlm_bl_work_item,
+						blwi_entry);
 
 	if (blwi) {
 		if (++num_bl >= num_th)

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-13  3:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-13  3:15 [PATCH 00/13] Assorted lustre clean-ups NeilBrown
2017-12-13  3:15 ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2017-12-13  3:15 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2017-12-13  3:15   ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 03/12] staging: lustre: ldlm: use list_first_entry in ldlm_lockd.c NeilBrown
2017-12-13  3:15 ` [PATCH 04/12] staging: lustre: ldlm: minor list_entry improvements in ldlm_request.c NeilBrown
2017-12-13  3:15   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2017-12-13  3:15 ` [PATCH 06/12] staging: lustre: lov: use list_for_each_entry in lov_obd.c NeilBrown
2017-12-13  3:15   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2017-12-13  3:15 ` [PATCH 05/12] staging: lustre: ldlm: use list_for_each_entry in ldlm_resource.c NeilBrown
2017-12-13  3:15   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2017-12-13  3:15 ` [PATCH 02/12] staging: lustre: ldlm: use list_for_each_entry in ldlm_extent_shift_kms() NeilBrown
2017-12-13  3:15   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2017-12-13  3:15 ` [PATCH 01/12] staging: lustre: use list_last_entry to simplify fld_cache_shrink NeilBrown
2017-12-13  3:15   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2017-12-13  3:15 ` [PATCH 08/12] staging: lustre: libcfs: remove unused rounding functions NeilBrown
2017-12-13  3:15   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2017-12-13  3:15 ` [PATCH 11/12] staging: lustre: libcfs: discard KLASSERT() NeilBrown
2017-12-13  3:15   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2017-12-13  3:15 ` [PATCH 10/12] staging: lustre: libcfs: discard MAX_NUMERIC_VALUE NeilBrown
2017-12-13  3:15   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2017-12-13  3:15 ` [PATCH 07/12] staging: lustre: libcfs: simplify memory allocation NeilBrown
2017-12-13  3:15   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2017-12-14  0:00   ` NeilBrown
2017-12-14  0:00     ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2017-12-14  3:34   ` Patrick Farrell
2017-12-13  3:15 ` [PATCH 12/12] staging: lustre: libcfs: discard LASSERT_CHECKED NeilBrown
2017-12-13  3:15   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2017-12-13  3:33   ` Patrick Farrell
2017-12-13 10:22     ` Luis de Bethencourt
2017-12-13 10:22       ` Luis de Bethencourt
2017-12-13  3:15 ` [PATCH 09/12] staging: lustre: libcfs: discard MKSTR() macro NeilBrown
2017-12-13  3:15   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=151313495486.27582.12193540145417673665.stgit@noble \
    --to=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jsimmons@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
    --cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.