Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix clang-format configuration according to checkpatch.pl

["Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>]

Miguel, what do you think about this series? Do you plan to take it for 
the next merge window? FYI, I plan to use it for Landlock [1] and send 
it for the next merge window. Could you publish your pending 
clang-format changes so that I can make sure everything is OK?

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220506160513.523257-1-mic@digikod.net

On 06/05/2022 18:01, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This series brings some improvements to the clang-format configuration
> to make it compatible with the checkpatch.pl rules:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/8b6b252b-47a6-9d52-f0bd-10d3bc4ad244@digikod.net
> 
> I also found that the for_each issue has already been talk about here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHmME9ofzanQTBD_WYBRW49d+gM77rCdh8Utdk4+PM9n_bmKwA@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> I use these changes for Landlock.
> 
> This is based on v5.18-rc5.
> 
> Previous version:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220412153906.428179-1-mic@digikod.net
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Mickaël Salaün (5):
>    clang-format: Update and extend the for_each list with tools/
>    clang-format: Update to clang-format >= 6
>    clang-format: Fix goto labels indentation
>    clang-format: Fix empty curly braces
>    clang-format: Fix space after for_each macros
> 
>   .clang-format | 216 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>   1 file changed, 169 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> base-commit: 672c0c5173427e6b3e2a9bbb7be51ceeec78093a