All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Pintu Agarwal <pintu.ping@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Phillip Lougher <phillip@squashfs.org.uk>,
	Sean Nyekjaer <sean@geanix.com>,
	Kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org>
Subject: Re: MTD: How to get actual image size from MTD partition
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 08:40:15 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1556211076.48404.1626763215205.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOuPNLh_KY4NaVWSEV2JPp8fx0iy8E1MU8GHT-w7-hMXrvSaeA@mail.gmail.com>

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Pintu Agarwal" <pintu.ping@gmail.com>
> Okay thank you.
> We have tried dm-verity with squashfs (for our rootfs) but we are
> facing some mounting issues.
> [...]
> [    4.697757] device-mapper: init: adding target '0 96160 verity 1
> /dev/mtdblock34 /dev/mtdblock39 4096 4096 12020 8 sha256
> d7b8a7d0c01b9aec888930841313a81603a50a2a7be44631c4c813197a50d681
> aee087a5be3b982978c923f566a94613496b417f2af592639bc80d141e34dfe7'
> [    4.704771] device-mapper: verity: sha256 using implementation
> "sha256-generic"
> [...]
> [    4.727366] device-mapper: init: dm-0 is ready
> [    4.912558] VFS: Cannot open root device "dm-0" or
> unknown-block(253,0): error -5
> 
> The same works with ext4 emulation.
> So, not sure if there are any changes missing w.r.t. squashfs on 4.14 kernel ?

I don't know.

> Anyways, I will create a separate thread for dm-verity issue and keep
> this thread still open for UBI image size issue.
> We may use dm-verify for rootfs during booting, but still we need to
> perform integrity check for other nand partitions and UBI volumes.
> 
> So, instead of calculating the checksum for the entire partition, is
> it possible to perform checksum only based on the image size ?
> Right now, we are still exploring what are the best possible
> mechanisms available for this.

I still don't fully understand what you are trying to achieve.
Is it about cryptographic integrity of your storage or detecting
errors after the flashing process?

But let me advertise ubiblock a second time. If you place your squashfs on
a UBI static volume, UBI knows the exact length and you can checksum it
more easily.

Thanks,
//richard

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Pintu Agarwal <pintu.ping@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	 linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Phillip Lougher <phillip@squashfs.org.uk>,
	 Sean Nyekjaer <sean@geanix.com>,
	 Kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org>
Subject: Re: MTD: How to get actual image size from MTD partition
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 08:40:15 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1556211076.48404.1626763215205.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOuPNLh_KY4NaVWSEV2JPp8fx0iy8E1MU8GHT-w7-hMXrvSaeA@mail.gmail.com>

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Pintu Agarwal" <pintu.ping@gmail.com>
> Okay thank you.
> We have tried dm-verity with squashfs (for our rootfs) but we are
> facing some mounting issues.
> [...]
> [    4.697757] device-mapper: init: adding target '0 96160 verity 1
> /dev/mtdblock34 /dev/mtdblock39 4096 4096 12020 8 sha256
> d7b8a7d0c01b9aec888930841313a81603a50a2a7be44631c4c813197a50d681
> aee087a5be3b982978c923f566a94613496b417f2af592639bc80d141e34dfe7'
> [    4.704771] device-mapper: verity: sha256 using implementation
> "sha256-generic"
> [...]
> [    4.727366] device-mapper: init: dm-0 is ready
> [    4.912558] VFS: Cannot open root device "dm-0" or
> unknown-block(253,0): error -5
> 
> The same works with ext4 emulation.
> So, not sure if there are any changes missing w.r.t. squashfs on 4.14 kernel ?

I don't know.

> Anyways, I will create a separate thread for dm-verity issue and keep
> this thread still open for UBI image size issue.
> We may use dm-verify for rootfs during booting, but still we need to
> perform integrity check for other nand partitions and UBI volumes.
> 
> So, instead of calculating the checksum for the entire partition, is
> it possible to perform checksum only based on the image size ?
> Right now, we are still exploring what are the best possible
> mechanisms available for this.

I still don't fully understand what you are trying to achieve.
Is it about cryptographic integrity of your storage or detecting
errors after the flashing process?

But let me advertise ubiblock a second time. If you place your squashfs on
a UBI static volume, UBI knows the exact length and you can checksum it
more easily.

Thanks,
//richard

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Pintu Agarwal <pintu.ping@gmail.com>
Cc: Kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org>,
	Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	Sean Nyekjaer <sean@geanix.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Phillip Lougher <phillip@squashfs.org.uk>
Subject: Re: MTD: How to get actual image size from MTD partition
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 08:40:15 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1556211076.48404.1626763215205.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOuPNLh_KY4NaVWSEV2JPp8fx0iy8E1MU8GHT-w7-hMXrvSaeA@mail.gmail.com>

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Pintu Agarwal" <pintu.ping@gmail.com>
> Okay thank you.
> We have tried dm-verity with squashfs (for our rootfs) but we are
> facing some mounting issues.
> [...]
> [    4.697757] device-mapper: init: adding target '0 96160 verity 1
> /dev/mtdblock34 /dev/mtdblock39 4096 4096 12020 8 sha256
> d7b8a7d0c01b9aec888930841313a81603a50a2a7be44631c4c813197a50d681
> aee087a5be3b982978c923f566a94613496b417f2af592639bc80d141e34dfe7'
> [    4.704771] device-mapper: verity: sha256 using implementation
> "sha256-generic"
> [...]
> [    4.727366] device-mapper: init: dm-0 is ready
> [    4.912558] VFS: Cannot open root device "dm-0" or
> unknown-block(253,0): error -5
> 
> The same works with ext4 emulation.
> So, not sure if there are any changes missing w.r.t. squashfs on 4.14 kernel ?

I don't know.

> Anyways, I will create a separate thread for dm-verity issue and keep
> this thread still open for UBI image size issue.
> We may use dm-verify for rootfs during booting, but still we need to
> perform integrity check for other nand partitions and UBI volumes.
> 
> So, instead of calculating the checksum for the entire partition, is
> it possible to perform checksum only based on the image size ?
> Right now, we are still exploring what are the best possible
> mechanisms available for this.

I still don't fully understand what you are trying to achieve.
Is it about cryptographic integrity of your storage or detecting
errors after the flashing process?

But let me advertise ubiblock a second time. If you place your squashfs on
a UBI static volume, UBI knows the exact length and you can checksum it
more easily.

Thanks,
//richard

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-20  6:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-16  6:42 MTD: How to get actual image size from MTD partition Pintu Agarwal
2021-07-16  6:42 ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-07-16  6:42 ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-07-16  7:16 ` Richard Weinberger
2021-07-16  7:16   ` Richard Weinberger
2021-07-16  7:16   ` Richard Weinberger
2021-07-16 15:41 ` Greg KH
2021-07-16 15:41   ` Greg KH
2021-07-16 15:41   ` Greg KH
2021-07-16 16:26   ` Richard Weinberger
2021-07-16 16:26     ` Richard Weinberger
2021-07-16 16:26     ` Richard Weinberger
2021-07-19  9:09     ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-07-19  9:09       ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-07-19  9:09       ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-07-19  9:28       ` Richard Weinberger
2021-07-19  9:28         ` Richard Weinberger
2021-07-19  9:28         ` Richard Weinberger
2021-07-20  6:17         ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-07-20  6:17           ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-07-20  6:17           ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-07-20  6:40           ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2021-07-20  6:40             ` Richard Weinberger
2021-07-20  6:40             ` Richard Weinberger
2021-07-20  8:01             ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-07-20  8:01               ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-07-20  8:01               ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-07-21 20:54               ` Richard Weinberger
2021-07-21 20:54                 ` Richard Weinberger
2021-07-21 20:54                 ` Richard Weinberger
2021-07-22 11:10                 ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-07-22 11:10                   ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-07-22 11:10                   ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-07-27 21:16                   ` Richard Weinberger
2021-07-27 21:16                     ` Richard Weinberger
2021-07-27 21:16                     ` Richard Weinberger
2021-07-29 11:17                     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2021-07-29 11:17                       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2021-07-29 11:17                       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2021-07-29 11:45                       ` Richard Weinberger
2021-07-29 11:45                         ` Richard Weinberger
2021-07-29 11:45                         ` Richard Weinberger
2021-07-29 12:03                         ` Ezequiel Garcia
2021-07-29 12:03                           ` Ezequiel Garcia
2021-07-29 12:03                           ` Ezequiel Garcia
2021-07-29 17:11                           ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-07-29 17:11                             ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-07-29 17:11                             ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-08-20 18:24                             ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-08-20 18:24                               ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-08-20 18:24                               ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-08-22 14:21                               ` Ezequiel Garcia
2021-08-22 14:21                                 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2021-08-22 14:21                                 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2021-08-30 15:58                                 ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-08-30 15:58                                   ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-08-30 15:58                                   ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-10-29 16:12                                   ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-10-29 16:12                                     ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-10-29 16:12                                     ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-10-29 16:48                                     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2021-10-29 16:48                                       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2021-10-29 16:48                                       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2021-11-08 13:51                                       ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-11-08 13:51                                         ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-11-08 13:51                                         ` Pintu Agarwal
2021-11-12 13:58                                         ` Ezequiel Garcia
2021-11-12 13:58                                           ` Ezequiel Garcia
2021-11-12 13:58                                           ` Ezequiel Garcia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1556211076.48404.1626763215205.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at \
    --to=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=phillip@squashfs.org.uk \
    --cc=pintu.ping@gmail.com \
    --cc=sean@geanix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.