All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Handle i915_active_fence_set() with the same fence
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 10:42:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <157320975278.9461.12594003157929445086@skylake-alporthouse-com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15789d91-2a7d-373e-fefc-a0e5e09e1857@linux.intel.com>

Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-11-08 10:37:37)
> 
> On 06/11/2019 15:48, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > If the caller wants to overwrite the currently tracked fence, with
> > itself, as far as the tracking is concerned it is a no-op, so simply
> > allow it.
> 
> This is needed for some of the following patches in this series?

The implementation is relaxed in patch 3, which means we allow the user
to update the same i915_request.fence on the same timeline multiple times.
We already allow them to use the same fence multiple times, symmetry is
good?...
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Handle i915_active_fence_set() with the same fence
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 10:42:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <157320975278.9461.12594003157929445086@skylake-alporthouse-com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191108104232.sGrjHBmrMGTUzdCIeR8gdcTXSp1jC6R1iRtkxokFB9A@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15789d91-2a7d-373e-fefc-a0e5e09e1857@linux.intel.com>

Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-11-08 10:37:37)
> 
> On 06/11/2019 15:48, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > If the caller wants to overwrite the currently tracked fence, with
> > itself, as far as the tracking is concerned it is a no-op, so simply
> > allow it.
> 
> This is needed for some of the following patches in this series?

The implementation is relaxed in patch 3, which means we allow the user
to update the same i915_request.fence on the same timeline multiple times.
We already allow them to use the same fence multiple times, symmetry is
good?...
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-08 10:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-06 15:48 [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Handle i915_active_fence_set() with the same fence Chris Wilson
2019-11-06 15:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-06 15:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Drop inspection of execbuf flags during evict Chris Wilson
2019-11-06 15:48   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-08  9:54   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-08  9:54     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2019-11-08 10:11     ` Chris Wilson
2019-11-08 10:11       ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-08 10:20       ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-08 10:20         ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2019-11-08 10:40         ` Chris Wilson
2019-11-08 10:40           ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-08 16:06           ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-08 16:06             ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2019-11-06 15:48 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/gem: Extract transient execbuf flags from i915_vma Chris Wilson
2019-11-06 15:48   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-08  9:53   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-08  9:53     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2019-11-08 10:05     ` Chris Wilson
2019-11-08 10:05       ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-08 16:13       ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-08 16:13         ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2019-11-06 19:22 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915: Handle i915_active_fence_set() with the same fence Patchwork
2019-11-06 19:22   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-08 10:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-11-08 10:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-11-08 10:42   ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2019-11-08 10:42     ` Chris Wilson
2019-11-08 12:00 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [1/3] " Patchwork
2019-11-08 12:00   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=157320975278.9461.12594003157929445086@skylake-alporthouse-com \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.