All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpuset: fix cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() don't update tsk->rt.nr_cpus_allowed
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 21:26:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110516132623.GA2058@zhy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110515185547.GL2258@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 11:55:47AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Seems rcu_spawn_one_cpu_kthread() call wake_up_process() directly,
> > which is under hotplug event CPU_UP_PREPARE. Maybe it should be
> > under CPU_ONLINE.
> 
> Sorry, but this does not work.  The kthread must be running by the time

Yup, I also noticed that from the comments of rcu_spawn_one_cpu_kthread();

> the CPU appears, otherwise RCU grace periods in CPU_ONLINE notifiers
> will never complete.
> 
> This did turn out to be a scheduler bug -- see Cheng Xu's recent patch.
> (chengxu@linux.vnet.ibm.com)

Hmmm, I don't think they are same issue.

The patch sent by Cheng Xu is about rt runtime normalization during
CPU hotplug.

But this one is about too earlier rt_rq load balance.

Let consider this:

		on boot CPU
	...
	kernel_init();
	  smp_init();
	    _cpu_up();
	      __cpu_notify(CPU_UP_PREPARE | mod, hcpu, -1, &nr_calls);
	        rcu_cpu_notify();
		  rcu_online_kthreads();
		    rcu_spawn_one_node_kthread();
		      wake_up_process();
		        try_to_wake_up();
			  select_task_rq();
			    select_fallback_rq();
			      cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback();
			        /* here the rcu_thread's cpus_allowed will be set
				   to cpu_possible_mask, but now we only have the
				   boot cpu online, so it will run on the boot cpu
				   So if we have KOSAKI's patch applied,
				   p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed will be set to
				   cpumask_weight(cpu_possible_mask);
				 */
		      sched_setscheduler_nocheck(t, SCHED_FIFO, &sp);
		        __sched_setscheduler();
			  check_class_changed();
			    p->sched_class->switched_to(rq, p); /* rt_class */
			      push_rt_task();
			        find_lock_lowest_rq();
				  find_lowest_rq();
				    /* crash here because local_cpu_mask is uninitialized */


Thanks,
Yong

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-16 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-28 14:20 [RFC PATCH] cpuset: fix cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() don't update tsk->rt.nr_cpus_allowed KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-28 16:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-02 10:42   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-02 10:55     ` [PATCH 1/2] " KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-11 16:05       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-13  5:48         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-13  6:42           ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-13  7:33             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-13  7:43               ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-13  9:34                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-13 17:02             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-14 11:17               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-16 13:37               ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-19  8:45                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-19  8:54                   ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-15 18:55             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-16 13:26               ` Yong Zhang [this message]
2011-05-19  6:06                 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rcu: don't bind offline cpu KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-19  6:08                   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cpuset: fix cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() don't update tsk->rt.nr_cpus_allowed KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-28 16:35                     ` [tip:sched/urgent] cpuset: Fix cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(), " tip-bot for KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-20 10:20                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-21  9:54                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-19  8:34                   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rcu: don't bind offline cpu Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-19  8:50                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-19  9:41                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-19 10:12                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-19 11:41                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-20 22:46                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-19  8:55                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-02 10:56     ` [PATCH 2/2] sched, cpuset: introduce do_set_cpus_allowed() helper function KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-02 12:58     ` [RFC PATCH] cpuset: fix cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() don't update tsk->rt.nr_cpus_allowed Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110516132623.GA2058@zhy \
    --to=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.